The All Purpose Hillary Clinton Thread

Fudbucker said:
Of course lies told by politicians are meaningful. Each one erodes trust, until nothing they say is believable.
Click to expand...


Deleted work related emails -- obstruction of justice.

Lying to Congress -- perjury.

"What difference does it make, at this point?" -- Crooked Hillary
 
Slings and Arrows said:
Deleted work related emails -- obstruction of justice.

Lying to Congress -- perjury.

"What difference does it make, at this point?" -- Crooked Hillary
Click to expand...

It's about the SCOTUS. I'd rather have Hillary appoint the next SCOTUS Justice(s) than Trump.
 
Fudbucker said:
My question to her supporters is, what makes you like her? Doesn't the constant lying grate on some of you?
Click to expand...
Bull! Your assertion of constant lying is unsupportable tripe. Try this: Incessant repetition by the GOP which does a good job keeping the narrative in the news media, combined with the major news media in this country that doesn't sell valid information, they sell scandal and controversy whether it exists or not.

That's what grates on me along with the sheeple that suck it up and echo it back.
 
Fudbucker said:
:rolleyes:

Don't the numerous untruthful statements as reported by organizations like WaPo, Factcheck, and Politifact grate on some of you?
Click to expand...

No, because the majority of them are trivial, business as usual politics.

You seem to be a tad obsessed with these trivial nitpicks. Why don't you spend a day telling us about Trump's every lie and ignorant statement. That should keep your mind off your HDS for a while.
 
TriangleMan said:
I find it rather strange myself about how people attack her. Here is a woman who has been involved in politics and activism for over 40 years, even before marrying Bill, and yet if someone didn't know her and only went by the posts on this forum criticizing her you would swear her career consisted of:

Being First Lady a long time ago; then nothing until . . .
A few years ago she showed up at a Goldman Sachs seminar, grabbed the mike, said, "I totally voted for the Iraq War, Yo. BENGHAZIIIII!!! YEAAAAH!" then ran off home to send some notes on her private email server in the basement while rolling in a big stack of money that had been given to the Clinton Foundation by the Saudis.

A couple of posters (newyorkguy, skeptic ginger) sometimes try to mention the wider scope of her long career but by and large people are just focusing on a snapshot of negatives and not looking at all the things she worked on over the years.

If you've been in politics long enough you'll make decisions that with hindsight were wrong (and in some occasions she admitted as such) other times you might decide something that an individual voter would not have agreed with but it's pretty much impossible to please everyone.

She appears to have developed some sensible policies (if you are left-leaning), she has more experience than pretty much anyone, has a very, very good understanding of how being President works. No, she's not as far to the left as Sanders but for a leftist voter she certainly is not a pit of evil. Why aren't most Americans looking at the wider scope of her accomplishments and her current plans and policies when deciding who to vote for?
Click to expand...

[whiny spoiled brat voice]

Because looking up facts is hard and I don't wanna!

[/whiny spoiled brat voice]
 
TriangleMan said:
Why aren't most Americans looking at the wider scope of her accomplishments?
Click to expand...


Well, Crooked Hillary's most noteworthy accomplishment would have to be her amassing a sizeable fortune while working as a so-called public servant. The Clinton's are now estimated to have well over $100 million.

Of course, nearly all of their tainted money came in the way of bribes from Goldman Sachs and other criminals, and donations to their phony charity from unsavory foreign governments seeking special favors.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
Well, Crooked Hillary's most noteworthy accomplishment would have to be her amassing a sizeable fortune while working as a so-called public servant. The Clinton's are now estimated to have well over $100 million.

Of course, nearly all of their tainted money came in the way of bribes from Goldman Sachs and other criminals, and donations to their phony charity from unsavory foreign governments seeking special favors.
Click to expand...

Feel free to substantiate any of this with evidence.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
Well, Crooked Hillary's most noteworthy accomplishment would have to be her amassing a sizeable fortune while working as a so-called public servant. The Clinton's are now estimated to have well over $100 million.

Of course, nearly all of their tainted money came in the way of bribes from Goldman Sachs and other criminals, and donations to their phony charity from unsavory foreign governments seeking special favors.
Click to expand...
Poor George. He did all that lying (weapons of mass destruction) for nothing, earning only 20 milion.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
Well, Crooked Hillary's most noteworthy accomplishment would have to be her amassing a sizeable fortune while working as a so-called public servant. The Clinton's are now estimated to have well over $100 million.

Of course, nearly all of their tainted money came in the way of bribes from Goldman Sachs and other criminals, and donations to their phony charity from unsavory foreign governments seeking special favors.
Click to expand...
Evidence?
 
Slings and Arrows said:
Well, Crooked Hillary's most noteworthy accomplishment would have to be her amassing a sizeable fortune while working as a so-called public servant. The Clinton's are now estimated to have well over $100 million.

Of course, nearly all of their tainted money came in the way of bribes from Goldman Sachs and other criminals, and donations to their phony charity from unsavory foreign governments seeking special favors.
Click to expand...

I presume this comment was made to prove my point.
 
I've been receiving texts from the Clinton campaign. Here is one of them.

"It's Jess from HFA. In November, the American people will elect the 45th president of the United States. Let's make sure that person is Hillary Clinton.

Chip in $45 for our future #45, and you'll get a button, stickers, shirt, and more:"
(Followed by a link I couldn't get to work)


Um...why would I need all of that stuff, and what is the "and more?"
 
Last edited:
http://www.npr.org/2016/08/04/48867...y-leader-favors-clinton-despite-email-debacle

Prominent Cybersecurity Leader Favors Clinton, Despite Email Debacle

Now here's a political endorsement you might not expect.

Hillary Clinton is the candidate who set up a private email server and was — in the words of the director of the FBI — "extremely careless" in how she handled classified information.

And her campaign and the Democratic Party just got hacked. Yet, prominent leaders in the cybersecurity industry are coming out in favor of Clinton for president.

The scene is something you just can't make up.
 
TheL8Elvis said:
http://www.npr.org/2016/08/04/48867...y-leader-favors-clinton-despite-email-debacle

Prominent Cybersecurity Leader Favors Clinton, Despite Email Debacle

Now here's a political endorsement you might not expect.

Hillary Clinton is the candidate who set up a private email server and was — in the words of the director of the FBI — "extremely careless" in how she handled classified information.

And her campaign and the Democratic Party just got hacked. Yet, prominent leaders in the cybersecurity industry are coming out in favor of Clinton for president.

The scene is something you just can't make up.
Click to expand...

They're probably aware that Clinton and her staff are able to learn from their mistakes.

Trump on the other hand, he and his bottom feeding crew would just change the password to Trump2016 and call it a day.
 
wareyin said:
Former director of the CIA also endorses Clinton.
Click to expand...

He says

I spent four years working with Mrs. Clinton when she was secretary of state, most often in the White House Situation Room. In these critically important meetings, I found her to be prepared, detail-oriented, thoughtful, inquisitive and willing to change her mind if presented with a compelling argument.
Click to expand...

There's no need to even discuss Trump's alleged policies or his passive-aggressive racism or his financial situation.

This and this alone is sufficient.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom