The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job

9/11-investigator said:
Wrong a theory explains events in a coherent manner. My blog does that, hence it is a theory. The theory might be correct, false, or something in between, but it is a theory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory
Click to expand...

You're wrong again. A common condition for liars about the Holocaust and 9/11 deniers. You must be very comfortable in that situation. Did you even read the link you provided? It contradicts you. Of course it's not as if facts ever get in the way of your kind.
 
9/11-investigator said:
Wrong a theory explains events in a coherent manner. My blog does that, hence it is a theory. The theory might be correct, false, or something in between, but it is a theory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory
Click to expand...

But to asssume that you have evidence to prove your theories, means you have none to prove.

You blog is just baseless accusations about nothing. Pure paranoia from your point of view.
 
Last edited:
Grizzly Bear said:
having read this users posts in the past I know full well he can exaggerate, and often does it for the humor. If you want to be very picky about it then I don't think it's 100% impossible, however, it goes without saying that the conspiracy theorists view complicates what might be otherwise valid alternatives to ridiculous extents. Controlled demolition, Star Wars technology, no planes, come up with what ever you want. In the end what you lack is evidence, and the supposed a case that you guys have against the engineering explanations offered for the collapses of the buildings has failed to reach even a rudimentary level that deserves recognition. In that respect I can understand why the thread was made; it is truther's incompetence that ultimately renders such theories impossible. It is their incompetence that reduces the value of their own evidence and nothing more.
Click to expand...
With respect, there can be no proof offered for something that, on its face, cannot be done and therefore would not be done.

Apart from the service they provide for analytical and educational reasons (both certainly worthwhile), every thread in this subforum, even the subforum itself, could arguably be regarded as unnecessary. The opening post serves to demonstrate as much.
 
As I pointed out, I don't agree with your approach. That doesn't mean I don't think you're right, I just don't think it requires going to the extent you did to make the point (hence my post). I just don't have a good sense of humor sometimes, and really if I did I'd have probably done the same OP at some point. Nothing ill-mannered intended in what I'm saying.
 
Last edited:
9/11-investigator said:
The Afghanistan/cave men picture was related to CIA asset bin Laden, after the fact, supposedly on the run for the US army, but in reality enjoying his old age in the grave. So you have a partial but irrelevant point here.
Click to expand...

Bin Laden is a very well educated Yemini Arab not an Afghan. Your cavemen analogy is as disingenuous as everything else you write. Can't you even be bothered to get some basic facts straight?
 
Craig4 said:
Bin Laden is a very well educated Yemini Arab not an Afghan. Your cavemen analogy is as disingenuous as everything else you write. Can't you even be bothered to get some basic facts straight?
Click to expand...

Yes, I believe calling him an Afghan, a caveman, or a CIA asset would earn one a pop in the nose, or worse, from Bin Laden.
 
9/11-investigator said:
If you read the 9/11 thread again you will notice that my opponents had no chance in hell in debunking my theory [*]. That does not mean that my theory is true, as I admit in my blog itself. It only means that my theory is better than your OCT theory which has been thoroughly debunked.

http://how911wasdone.blogspot.com/



[*] - one exception, I was forced to change my theory by including a 'gassing scenario' in the planes after my opponents convinced me that in the 9/11 planes the crew was always in a position of retaking the plane after an auto-pilot had run amok. This scenario was later perfectly confirmed by the pilot who shot down F93, he saw that everybody on board was dead.

http://911notes.blogspot.com/2009/05/pilot-who-shot-down-flight-93.html
Click to expand...

You should add a few ninjas to your theory. That would make it really cool.

Ooh, and a car chase! People like car chases.
 
Craig4 said:
Oh and don't get me started on the use of the word coherent. Do they not do irony where you're from 9/11?
Click to expand...
.
We haven't had any irony here since about, umm, '83, when I was the only practitioner of it. And I stopped because I was getting tired of being stared at.


From?


From?
.
 
beachnut said:
Not for those like you who believe 911 truth lies and delusions. You are under mind control as you spew nonsense on 911. You would have to be under mind control to believes such moronic claptrap.
Click to expand...

You've been pwned by a psyop.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom