• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

SweatyYeti's Martian Civilization Evidence Thread

There are a lot of artificial structures in cydonia. The face being but one example.

If you read the thread properly you would see lots of info and links to info that shows the face when seen properly is no face at all. Also you will see that Cydonia doesn't have any other artificial features.


This would have had to have been a high traffic area and would have had to have been involved in big-time manufacture and indoor agriculture. Or they couldn't have survived. Hence there must be underground tunnells there. And finding that there weren't would be a stinging blow to the concept of artificiality.

What a lovely hypothetical situation you've manufactured for yourself there. However, since there are no artificial structures or buildings at Cydonia and no tubular roads/glass worms to be seen... oops, you fall down.

We know that Infiltrators (Bigfoot) were on Mars as per the superior evidence I provided, and that they are genetic manipulants bred on Earth by aliens. We know they are used for offworld conflicts and that it was one of those conflicts that devasted Mars, a world that once was far more hospitable and we know by evidence you inadvertantly presented had flowing water.

You are clearly out of your league with my alien/Bigfoot/Mars paradigm. I shall offer you once again the attractive option of joining forces with my far better camp.

There are a lot of fine pictures of the tubular banded roads. The roads are of differing size but not THAT differing size. Like our roads are of differing size. Where did Moses say that all roads must be of the same size? Did he pull it from out of a burning bush?

A lot? Great, you shouldn't have any problem posting them so we don't have just the one concave water flow feature image to look at.
 
Last edited:
Dude, does Mars have scabies? Where the heck are these "roads" going?

Old Mars pic:



Oh right, yes. Concave water flow features. Now I get it.

New Mars pic:



Pretty simple stuff.
 
A closer inspection reveals some more evidence of Kitakaze's
Bigfoot Infiltrators and William Parcher's sewage drain systems.
 

Attachments

  • JcR's BF toilet time.jpg
    JcR's BF toilet time.jpg
    143.2 KB · Views: 127
Last edited:
what are the red lines on europa? possible bacteria colonies under the ice? its more plausible than yeti's wooish martian clam, dont u think?
 
Agatha did this earlier. She showed a picture of something else. And then she said "this one looks concave". So you've got a picture of the banded roads. And then you've got a picture of something else. And then you fall on the floor like an idiot. We were only interested in the banded tubular roads. We weren't interested in this sand or whatever.
 
Imagine being so foolish as to show a picture of something, then show a picture of something else entire. And then to think that one has made an argument???? Where does the foolishness end??? The tubular roads must stand on their own and not be conflated with pictures of other things.
 
Last edited:
The tubular roads must stand on their own and not be conflated with pictures of other things.

And you KNOW these features are roads because?

You saw the traffic signs in those pictures?
You have driven on them?
No. Ofcourse you did not.

But I'm sure you have other evidence to show us that these are tubular roads, to back up your interpretation of what is shown in the pictures.
 
The original picture I posted was one of your "banded tubular roads", just look at the pictures from which the image was generated.

Here's another one, showing more bands, but still clearly concave:
M1000471Det.jpg

Here is some more banding:
E2200005Det.JPG


and some more:
M1900128Det.GIF


with a bit of imagination, a squinted eye and poor lighting you could believe that this is a convex feature, but it still looks concave to me:
M0300102Det4.jpg
 
Last edited:
These are a whole new set of pictures that I haven't seen before. They are not the original pictures.
 
These are a whole new set of pictures that I haven't seen before. They are not the original pictures.


Evidence remains evidence whether you've bothered to look at it or not. In any case, since you're the only one here being scientific how can it be that other people have studied pictures that you've never seen?



The pictures are the evidence and obviously so. Attempt to be scientific about this for goodness sakes. Banded covered roads don't just grow out of the ground naturally.


Yes, you're right. Quite obvious. It's just not evidence of what you claim it is.
 
Make an argument for goodess sakes. The bottom photo may be of the tubular roads we are talking about. But you'd have to get a better look to see.

The bad pictures cannot undermine the good pictures. There is no valid argument here. The idea is to get the good pictures and see what it is they tell you. I'm only interested in the pictures where we can indeed see something that looks artificial.

Supposing you have a good picture of someone meeting someone else in Prague. And then you have blurred photos of some people you don't know and cannot tell who they are. Do the blurred photos negate the unblurred photos? No they don't. How about taking a break from irrationality for a change.
 
GMB, please?

And you KNOW these features are roads because?

You saw the traffic signs in those pictures?
You have driven on them?
No. Ofcourse you did not.

But I'm sure you have other evidence to show us that these are tubular roads, to back up your interpretation of what is shown in the pictures.
 
make an argument for goodess sakes. The bottom photo may be of the tubular roads we are talking about. But you'd have to get a better look to see.

The bad pictures cannot undermine the good pictures. There is no valid argument here. the idea is to get the good pictures and see what it is they tell you. i'm only interested in the pictures where we can indeed see something that looks artificial.

Supposing you have a good picture of someone meeting someone else in prague. And then you have blurred photos of some people you don't know and cannot tell who they are. Do the blurred photos negate the unblurred photos? No they don't. How about taking a break from irrationality for a change.

Hey, gumby! Why don't you post the good pictures already!?
 
Agatha did this earlier. She showed a picture of something else. And then she said "this one looks concave". So you've got a picture of the banded roads. And then you've got a picture of something else. And then you fall on the floor like an idiot. We were only interested in the banded tubular roads. We weren't interested in this sand or whatever.

OK, so you believe this:



...is a banded road. What kind of crackhead makes roads like that? They come together in totally random ways and go off and stop in the middle of nowhere? What sense does that make?

And where the hell is anything by you other than an "I say so" to support you idea of roads? I'm not sure if I want you on my Bigfoot team, gumby.
 
Well what do you think they are looking for? Where do you think they would wish to go? If they go to the areas where the large structures are, like Cydonia, then you would expect them to go underground. If there is no underground roads between those structures then that would seem to go against artificiality. Since those would be high traffic areas.
 
You're doing a far better job of killing civilization on Mars claims better than Sweaty ever could. Way to go.

Well what do you think they are looking for? Where do you think they would wish to go?

You have a total inability to substantiate your own ideas, don't you? I'm asking you to try and explain the complete asymmetrical and random nature of the features you call artificial. You can't.

If they go to the areas where the large structures are, like Cydonia, then you would expect them to go underground. If there is no underground roads between those structures then that would seem to go against artificiality. Since those would be high traffic areas.

No large structures in Cydonia and no glass worms leading to so-called "structures."

oOh NoEz
 

Back
Top Bottom