Stubblebine Speaks...

you know it is amazing those windows, how they managed to survive the blast from the missile/explosives used at the Pentagon on 9/11.

I don't think we are being told the truth, because it seems logical to me that if a missile hit, or explosives were used at the Pentagon on 9/11, that none of those windows should have survived.

TAM;)
 
you know it is amazing those windows, how they managed to survive the blast from the missile/explosives used at the Pentagon on 9/11.

I don't think we are being told the truth, because it seems logical to me that if a missile hit, or explosives were used at the Pentagon on 9/11, that none of those windows should have survived.

TAM;)

That unbroken window was located at the point of impact, according to the OCT.

There is no necessity that a window breaks from an explosion if that window is shielded off from the explosion by interior walls.

But a wing... come on.
 
That unbroken window was located at the point of impact, according to the OCT.

There is no necessity that a window breaks from an explosion if that window is shielded off from the explosion by interior walls.

But a wing... come on.

Which window are you talking about?

18141490f5f2e00e09.jpg
 
There is no necessity that a window breaks from an explosion if that window is shielded off from the explosion by interior walls.

The same explosion that made a large hole in the exterior wall?
Please explain where you think the explosives were planted in order to achieve this remarkable event?

That unbroken window was located at the point of impact, according to the OCT.

Incorrect.
Try again.
 
Last edited:
ummm it isn't thta he has expressed an interest in the paranormal.

It is his BELIEF that he can KILL with his mind. It is his stated BELIEF that he can walk through walls. It is his BELIEF that he is a JEDI. It is his BELIEF that he can remote view with accuracy of events.

It isn't an "interest in the paranormal" it is BAT **** CRAZY.
 
That unbroken window was located at the point of impact, according to the OCT.

There is no necessity that a window breaks from an explosion if that window is shielded off from the explosion by interior walls.

But a wing... come on.

you an expert on the matter? You see I am not, so I rely on the opinion of those who were there and investigated the matter.

That was my point...amateur speculation is worthless...wing, explosives, missile, what ever.

TAM:)
 
you an expert on the matter? You see I am not, so I rely on the opinion of those who were there and investigated the matter.

That's OK. I studied physics.

First year mechanics, thermodynamics, wave theory, special relativity theory.

Second year nuclear physics, quantummechanics.

Third year: studied the impact of airplane wings hitting windows. I did that for a whole year. Thousands of experiments and in all cases the windows were smashed. Trust me.

Fourth year: general relativity theory, electrodynamics.
 
Last edited:
That's OK. I studied physics.

First year mechanics, thermodynamics, wave theory, special relativity theory.

Second year nuclear physics, quantummechanics.

Third year: studied the impact of airplane wings hitting windows. I did that for a whole year. Thousands of experiments and in all cases the windows were smashed. Trust me.

Fourth year: general relativity theory, electrodynamics.
This sounds like a really interesting degree program. Which university did you study at? Do you happen to have a copy of their course catalog(s) for the years you studied?
 
Is the resident Holocaust denying neo-nazi a Pentagon no-planer now? How cute...
 
Is he a Pentagon no-planer now? How cute...

I have ever since december held the position that F77 and F93 are of minor importance in the grand scheme of things. Concentrate on WTC: that's where all the dying took place. There is the obvious CD.

But if I have to speculate, yes there was no plane at the Pentagon. There was an explosion from the inside and a plane flying over the Pentagon at extreme low altitude.

See: http://how911wasdone.blogspot.com/#flight77
 
Remember Jamie Mcintyre making his report live at he Pentagon ? 'Didn't look like a plane had crashed anywhere near the Pentagon ' only pieces small enough that you could pick up in your hand'. '' there are no large pieces like tail sctions, wing sections, fuselage...'

This was the clip we saw on 9/11 and the only one we saw for years.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C02dE5VKeck
 
Last edited:
But if I have to speculate, yes there was no plane at the Pentagon. There was an explosion from the inside and a plane flying over the Pentagon at extreme low altitude.

See: [link from garbage blog redacted]

:dl: :dl: :dl:

Wow! So you're a CIT follower, nazi?!?!? Thanks for the laugh!
 

Back
Top Bottom