rjh01
Gentleman of leisure
It is odd that her supporters do not worry about the lack of evidence of her abilities, when you would expect their to be plenty of evidence for her abilities. In her forums none were ever posted. I have looked.
I was in the same position at one time and could only defend and repeat what she so often proclaims. I was taking her word for it and believing it myself.
You talk as if your hands were bound. Your eyes blinded. Your ears blocked and your mouth gagged.
Sylvia Browne must indeed be a very powerful being to gain that much control over you. Using her power to force your will to hers.
Oh Yeah, She's just another crooked old lady liar.
You talk as if your hands were bound. Your eyes blinded. Your ears blocked and your mouth gagged.
Sylvia Browne must indeed be a very powerful being to gain that much control over you. Using her power to force your will to hers.
Oh Yeah, She's just another crooked old lady liar.
You could have done more than just "defend and repeat what she so often proclaims" you just chose not to.
You liked what she was selling and bought as much of her as you could.
The problem was never that SB sucked you into her web of lies and crime.
The problem has always been you walked into it with a smile on your face and thanking her for it.
The sooner you figure out why you did that the better your life will become and also the sooner you can put all this SB crap to rest and move on.
Brattus, I really don't understand what you hope to gain by being hostile towards former fans of Browne. Bullying them into admitting that they were willing participants in their relationship with Browne can change their minds about what side of the fence they are on, and, probably worse, it might convince lurkers to stay on the other side of the fence. I'm not saying that you should coddle them, but there is a wide spectrum between coddling and bullying. You did this with ExMinister, who is a wonderful lady. I don't have much of a feel for what kind of a person this Francine is, but she seems to have turned away from Browne, and I see no reason to badger her for not seeing her former relationship with Browne exactly the way you wish she did.
By the way, your Home Page seems to not work.
Speaking as a former fan of Sylvia, I would like to add that Brattus's behavior is the reason why the term "skeptic" has a negative connotation to many people. I have come to realize that to be skeptical in the true sense of the word is a great thing. So thank you, Brattus, for assuming the antagonist role. Without you, I may not have fully appreciated or recognized more rational, intelligent skeptics.
Brattus, I really don't understand what you hope to gain by being hostile towards former fans of Browne. Bullying them into admitting that they were willing participants in their relationship with Browne can change their minds about what side of the fence they are on, and, probably worse, it might convince lurkers to stay on the other side of the fence. I'm not saying that you should coddle them, but there is a wide spectrum between coddling and bullying. You did this with ExMinister, who is a wonderful lady. I don't have much of a feel for what kind of a person this Francine is, but she seems to have turned away from Browne, and I see no reason to badger her for not seeing her former relationship with Browne exactly the way you wish she did.
When I first came to this forum, I posted frequently about my personal experiences with Sylvia Browne and her organization. As the minister of her church in Delaware, I spent many years believing in her, just as Ex-Minister and Francine did. I still come here frequently and read, but gave up posting because of Brattus' arrogant attitude towards anyone who had personal experiences with Sylvia Browne. I see his attitude towards us has not changed.
But Robert, (and I can only speak for myself) changing my mind about what side of the fence I'm on will not happen. Once I started gathering evidence of how corrupt her organization is and through my personal dealings with Sylvia, what a completely UNspiritual person she really is, I knew that I'd made a big mistake....I admitted it publicly and moved on with my life. I refrained from reading anything you Brattus posted on the subject of Sylvia Browne and her "followers" because your posts irritated the hell out of me...and I find they still do.
Robert....hope your health is continuing to improve....you are in my thoughts and prayers (yes, prayers) often.
In what way to RSLancastr's posts irritate you? His posts here, or his posts on StopSylvia.com, or both?I refrained from reading anything you Brattus posted on the subject of Sylvia Browne and her "followers" because your posts irritated the hell out of me...and I find they still do.
In what way to RSLancastr's posts irritate you? His posts here, or his posts on StopSylvia.com, or both?
It is odd that her supporters do not worry about the lack of evidence of her abilities, when you would expect their to be plenty of evidence for her abilities. In her forums none were ever posted. I have looked.
You see, she has very SPECIAL abilities, which do not lend themselves to such things as validation or being visible or tactile or anything mundane like that.
It's SPECIAL!![]()
Its not Roberts post, but the posts in the Sylvia threads by Brattus that Seeking Truth was upset by.
Brattus, haven't seen you around much in a while. Hope things are going well for you.
To clarify this clarification, it was not my posts in threads by Brattus, but Brattus' posts themselves, which upset SeekingTruth.
Brattus, I really don't understand what you hope to gain by being hostile towards former fans of Browne. Bullying them into admitting that they were willing participants in their relationship with Browne can change their minds about what side of the fence they are on, and, probably worse, it might convince lurkers to stay on the other side of the fence. I'm not saying that you should coddle them, but there is a wide spectrum between coddling and bullying. You did this with ExMinister, who is a wonderful lady. I don't have much of a feel for what kind of a person this Francine is, but she seems to have turned away from Browne, and I see no reason to badger her for not seeing her former relationship with Browne exactly the way you wish she did.
By the way, your Home Page seems to not work.
Way to take my quote out of context, Brattus. You took one sentence out of a paragraph that I wrote and decided to inject more of your indignant, self righteousness. I find it hilarious, however, that the very next sentence after the one you quoted proves your point exactly. "I was taking her word for it and believing it myself."
I've never claimed that she had any power over me. I wanted to believe her and I did believe her. You don't know her in person, I do. You can't say with certainty how you would react to her if you had more of a believer mindset rather than a skeptical one. She can be very charming and believable at times.
Bottom line is- it was my own fault. I don't think I've ever stated otherwise but if I have, feel free to point that quote out to the forum.
Congratulations for stating the obvious, Brattus. I don't know why you have felt so much hostility toward me from the very beginning, but if you don't like what I have to say, feel free to ignore the Sylvia Browne threads.
If you don't have a background in scientific or critical thinking, this can pass for evidence.