Smokescreen at the Pentagon

[I Ratant]

Exactly that!

I just find it fascinating that they had to have the smoke machine, but didn't need a plane, a camera to catch the impact in clear detail, or even bodies for the EMTs to find...

.
The RULES for being an Evil Overlord! All us EO's follow them!
http://www.eviloverlord.com/lists/overlord.html

 

[Andy_Ross]

So. A missile did this? Fired by our own govt upon itself? To justify a war? And by claiming it was a plane that caused the damage and fire, the public be duped into thinking foreign al Queda or Taliban terrorists did it? But missiles dont make that much fire? So our govt rigged up smoke machines to fake people out? Then planted plane parts all over? And maybe stuck charred dead bodies in there also?
.
Is this on the right track?

Yes but add in the the Aircraft and their passengers were landed elsewhere and then the passengers all killed and their bodies and aircraft parts were taken to the Pentagon.

 

[twinstead]

Well they could have just bribed all the forensic people into falsifying the DNA results. In the case, they could have put any bodies there

 

[jaydeehess]

.
The RULES for being an Evil Overlord! All us EO's follow them!
http://www.eviloverlord.com/lists/overlord.html

100. Finally, to keep my subjects permanently locked in a mindless trance, I will provide each of them with free unlimited Internet access.

Its working................... that's why yankee is here.

 

[HotRodDeluxe]

I say again, none are so blind as those who will not see, but if a picture paints a thousand words this video speaks volumes.

Dude, you haven't got a case; you know it; we know it; you are just trolling (again).

 

[ozeco41]

Its working................... that's why yankee is here.

Actually he is not here. Must be the highest recorded "Trolling Efficiency Index" - heading towards infinity if you use a seven day rolling window base. He is still getting responses whilst he posts zero..

 

[yankee451]

So you got photographs from someone who wasn't allowed to have a camera in the area?

Let me guess, you can't say who the person is because "they" will get him, & you also can't post the photographs here because it might reveal who they are.

He was in a photo which was taken from outside the restricted area, such as:

 

[yankee451]

You don't plan on ever producing proof of these claims do you?

Tell us again why we should believe you?

Why would anyone take anyone's word for anything without first checking the facts?

 

[yankee451]

Volatile liquids boiling off in an oxygen starved container. But you didn't really want to know that.

Such as is produced by a burst radiator?

 

[TJM]

He was in a photo which was taken from outside the restricted area, such as:

And if you look really close, you can make out the burned out remains of your smoke machine.

 

[yankee451]

And if you look really close, you can make out the burned out remains of your smoke machine.

That funnel of white smoke appears to have left a large, round, black scorch-mark almost as if a large explosive detonated there.

 

[Andy_Ross]

Or there had been a fire following an aircraft crash

 

[yankee451]

Or there had been a fire following an aircraft crash

Why a circular explosion and not a plane shaped hole? I mean if a jet can burrow into the ground (Shanksville) and slice through steel skyscrapers (WTC1 and 2), why leave a circular blast mark on a brick and concrete facade? How does that work in your world?

 

[TJM]

Why a circular explosion and not a plane shaped hole? I mean if a jet can burrow into the ground (Shanksville) and slice through steel skyscrapers (WTC1 and 2), why leave a circular blast mark on a brick and concrete facade? How does that work in your world?

I'll venture a guess - It didn't.

 

[yankee451]

a camera to catch the impact in clear detail.

Wait, what's this about clear details of the impact at the Pentagon? Did they release the security footage again or something? How about the confiscated footage from your average gas station and hotel, has that stuff been released?

 

[yankee451]

I'll venture a guess - It didn't.

It's right there. You can even see it in the images taken shortly after the explsions, but one thing you won't see is the "plane shaped hole". That hole CAN be seen in Shanksville and the WTC.

So again, circular blast mark versus plane shaped hole...or are you saying you see a plane shaped hole at the Pentagon too? If not, why not? Do tell.

 

[Craig4]

Wouldn't it make more sense to show a picture of something that is not the site of a plane crash to prove it wasn't a plane crash?

 

[TJM]

Lol, it's right there. You can see it even in early images. But one thing you won't see is the "plane shaped hole" you can see in Shanksville and the WTC.

So again, circular blast mark versus plane shaped hole...or are you saying you see a plane shaped hole at the Pentagon too? If not, why not? Do tell.

What "circular blast mark" are you referring to? There is no circular hole where 77 entered the building.

 

[yankee451]

Wouldn't it make more sense to show a picture of something that is not the site of a plane crash to prove it wasn't a plane crash?

Seen many plane crashes with military-grade smoke machines lately?

 

[TJM]

Wouldn't it make more sense to show a picture of something that is not the site of a plane crash to prove it wasn't a plane crash?

Seen many plane crashes with military-grade smoke machines lately?

*whoooosh*