Smokescreen at the Pentagon

This is a good example of Conspiracy research. His blurry over enlarged picture looked a bit like a 'blast mark' so that's what it was. No need to look for better pictures or more information.

Reminds me of a certain 'Iron Sun' proponent, he had a picture that he thought 'looked like' the sun had a solid iron surface so he ran with it.
 
Well, a tree being mistaken for a huge hole is probably as retarded a "theory" as I've ever seen. It's quite amazing how stupid these people can be.
 
NoahFence said:
Well, a tree being mistaken for a huge hole is probably as retarded a "theory" as I've ever seen. It's quite amazing how stupid these people can be.
Click to expand...

Is this the same guy who wanted to set up an "experiment" in which a plane's wing would be flown into a steel building (or a mockup or something, I don't recall exactly) to "scientifically" demonstrate how impossible it was that real planes caused the observed damage to the Towers? And he doesn't even think to check his blurry photo against a clear one to see what he's actually looking at? Wow, what scientific rigor we have here.

I can't wait to see how he tries to wriggle out of this one...
 
turingtest said:
Is this the same guy who wanted to set up an "experiment" in which a plane's wing would be flown into a steel building (or a mockup or something, I don't recall exactly) to "scientifically" demonstrate how impossible it was that real planes caused the observed damage to the Towers? And he doesn't even think to check his blurry photo against a clear one to see what he's actually looking at? Wow, what scientific rigor we have here.

I can't wait to see how he tries to wriggle out of this one...
Click to expand...

I do believe that he's also the same one who implied that there were massive smoke machines attached to the side of the WTC, hidden by tarps with patterns on them that matched the façade of the towers...
 
NoahFence said:
I do believe that he's also the same one who implied that there were massive smoke machines attached to the side of the WTC, hidden by tarps with patterns on them that matched the façade of the towers...
Click to expand...

Pretty typical magical-thinking CTist approach- you don't have to prove the things that are necessary for your CT to work, you simply imagine them, then assert that they're real. It's a basically circular methodology they have in common with creationists; with CTists, the conspiracy is the deity that can be automatically assumed to have whatever properties it needs to be one.

It's also sort of funny the way he sneers at folks for believing what they "see on TeeVee," and then turns around and says "look at this video!" as proof of something he believes (don't even get me started on the idea that YouTube is some sort of infallible research tool).
 
NoahFence said:
I do believe that he's also the same one who implied that there were massive smoke machines attached to the side of the WTC, hidden by tarps with patterns on them that matched the façade of the towers...
Click to expand...

And claimed that the damage pattern of the towers proved that they had been pre-weakened by removing bolts and connections in the path of the airplane. Oh, excuse me, "airplane".

We could go even further back, to the JASSM nonsense, but those are days best left forgotten for him, methinks... :D
 
I can imagine the conversation there...

Someone carrying an F-35 into an adjacent building says "HOLD THE ELEVATOR!" so they can carry the 50,000+lb aircraft carrying the 2,000+lb JASSM up to the roof...
 
yankee451 said:
Wait, what's this about clear details of the impact at the Pentagon? Did they release the security footage again or something? How about the confiscated footage from your average gas station and hotel, has that stuff been released?
Click to expand...

No. Just pointing out how ridiculous the ideas you're putting forth are.

The had to have a smoke machine so they could fake a plane crash, but they couldn't be bothered with a plane, clear photos/film of the plane, or bodies from the plane.
 
Captain_Swoop said:
This is a good example of Conspiracy research. His blurry over enlarged picture looked a bit like a 'blast mark' so that's what it was. No need to look for better pictures or more information.

Reminds me of a certain 'Iron Sun' proponent, he had a picture that he thought 'looked like' the sun had a solid iron surface so he ran with it.
Click to expand...
.
I would expect one would run on a glowing hot iron surface... before melting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom