• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Simple question for Bigfoot enthusiasts: Why no unambiguous photos/videos?

I'm calling BS. Any Bigfoot researcher worth his/her salt knows the only dance bigfoot does is the Monkey, or on rare occasions the Cabbage Patch.
 
Bitter Monk said:
I'm calling BS. Any Bigfoot researcher worth his/her salt knows the only dance bigfoot does is the Monkey, or on rare occasions the Cabbage Patch.
Click to expand...
The Bossburg cripple foot sasquatch did the Swim, and most 'footers believe that Bigfoot leaves his mark on small trees in the forest by doing the Twist. and how about the Locomotion?
Get with it.
 
Last edited:
xblade said:
I think that might be a real bigfoot. No human can move like that, and to date, no one has replicated the video, so it just has to be real. If only it had a few crayon drawings on it, it would then be completely irrefutable.
Click to expand...

Hmmmm, it also looks an awful lot like your avatar.
Just an interesting coincidence?;)
 
GT/CS said:
Hmmmm, it also looks an awful lot like your avatar.
Just an interesting coincidence?;)
Click to expand...

Uh oh, the jig is up. Time to return to the forests of eastern NC where 6 foot wide, and 9 feet tall creatures like myself can move around at will, leaving not a single trace.
 
Look at the very sad state of recorded visual Bigfoot evidence. These are the permanent subforums of the BFF section on film/video. It's really embarassing to have a subsection devoted to the Manitoba and Marble Mountain videos, let alone the others. The Marble Mountain and Freeman sections only have 11 and 14 threads for each. It's just so ridiculous to hold this stuff front and center like this.
 

Attachments

  • BFF subforums.jpg
    BFF subforums.jpg
    32 KB · Views: 13
bikerdruid said:
...a 'lack of evidence' cannot prove anything.
Click to expand...

If the animal exists, it must leave some evidence of its existence.

Its ecological impact must be measurable with regard to numbers of flora and fauna which have disappeared without explanation. It must defecate and urinate, leaving samples which, like all known and studied animals, can be distinguished from all other known animals.

It must die, leaving mortal remains -- fresh and fossilized -- as we have found and recorded for all extant animals. It will bleed when injured, and leave hair attached to branches and in "bedding" areas.

It will seek vast quantities of calories and, like the bear and raccoon among other animals, find easy and accessible food sources in areas of human habitation, including parks and campgrounds.

It will come into contact with people -- enthusiasts, scientists and wildlife professionals -- who can photograph it with now-ubiquitous cellphone cameras and video cameras. It will pass by game and research cameras programmed to snap photos of passersby.

We have nothing of the above that cannot be hoaxed or which is in any way definite, certain or unambiguous. This stands in direct contrast to every other species of animal on the North American continent -- including the Californian wolverine, of which there is exactly one in the state of CA, and of which a research camera snapped a photo as it passed by.

In this way, the lack of evidence for an animal's existence indicates that the animal cannot be reasonably said to exist.
 
Last edited:
Just imagine if Bigfoot's added to the animal kingdom.

Picture4.jpg
 
Drewbot said:
Vortigern99 said:
If the animal exists is a carbon-based life-form, it must leave some evidence of its existence.
Click to expand...

Maybe it converts ammonia to crystals, and completely uses the crystals in the synthesis of Plurons for energy.
Click to expand...

[1] Hence the word 'animal'. An animal is a carbon-based, multicellular organism of the kingdom Animalia, differing from plants in certain typical characteristics such as capacity for locomotion, nonphotosynthetic metabolism, pronounced response to stimuli, restricted growth, and fixed bodily structure.

There is no need to repeat the widely agreed-on and scientifically accepted characteristics of an animal, including its elemental composition, when one uses the word.

[2] Maybe it does. Also, maybe as its hair follicles slough off they disintegrate into unbonded molecules along with its bones, blood, organs, tissues, etc.

And maybe I keep an invisible pink unicorn in my toolshed! Ya think?
 
LTC,

I believe on the new BFF shape-shifting will go in a sub-forum under the heading of Transmorphic Zooform Phenomena. I've been boning up with my new Ronco Crypto Dictionary.


m
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom