Shower me with April Stundie Nominations

I hope that Mark Kelly uses the Buzz Aldrin method of dealing with these idiots.

That would be so sweet. I would like for those guys to talk to any astronaut and explain their theories.
 
Have'nt you seen "Wag The Dog",Sheeple?

A great many of the Tin Foil Brigade are convinced that "Wag The Dog" is a docudrama.

Well they think 'Towering Inferno' is an illuminati plot to foreshadow 9/11 so....
 
Since when did steel beams bend without ripping at the joints?

Yea who ever heard of curved steel?

link

There is actually a really funny photo analysis in that thread where they point out evidence that a still image taken from a digital video is actually 2 cops running in front of a green screen. The shoulder badge is labeled as a "Missing Fragment."
 
Yea who ever heard of curved steel?

link

There is actually a really funny photo analysis in that thread where they point out evidence that a still image taken from a digital video is actually 2 cops running in front of a green screen. The shoulder badge is labeled as a "Missing Fragment."

Your link just says "link" and doesn't actually take you anywhere. I smell a conspiracy! ;)
 
Here's a sublime piece of material from the ever reliable WTC Dust.

The question by spanx followed by the stundie.

Can you provide a link or post up your research.

I have seen your avatar and the two pictures you provided, is that all of your research ?

Yes. The avatar and two pictures is the sum total of what I've been able to discover in 11.5 years. I'm a very slow worker.
Thank god we don't suffer from this lack of progress. We would still be in the stone age!
 
(bolding mine)

You don't understand conservation of momentum, then.

In a collision between two objects...

Force ------> equals exactly
<------ Force

In the scenario being discussed, an airplane imparting a force in the northerly direction (having impacted the south face of WTC 2 as it was moving north) would have resulted in plane parts and debris traveling in the southerly direction. This was not seen.

Conservation of momentum doesn't mean the plane keeps going.

A Stundie factory in overtime....
 
Aaah the Clueless forum, bless their bottomless pit of stupidity.

In the 'Miscellaneous NASA Comedies' thread, alluded to in previous Stundie nominations I believe, there is a beautiful photograph of Saturn, taken by a passing Voyager probe.

Today, in response to that photograph, we have this

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1583#p2382565

This Saturn image has always bugged me. Just to be able to get the entire planet in frame, let alone focused,the camera would have to be so far away as to render the image, well, unimaginable. The lighting is also entirely unbelievable. Do these planets even exist? We'll have to take their word for it...

So, Jupiter, when I saw it last weekend, complete with Galilean moons and beautiful banding, must have been painted on the binoculars, spotting scope and tabletop telescope by those evil NASA types.
 
You don't understand conservation of momentum, then.

In a collision between two objects...

Force ------> equals exactly
<------ Force

In the scenario being discussed, an airplane imparting a force in the northerly direction (having impacted the south face of WTC 2 as it was moving north) would have resulted in plane parts and debris traveling in the southerly direction. This was not seen.

Conservation of momentum doesn't mean the plane keeps going.

WTF Dust obviously has never seen a Newton's cradle
 
Aaah the Clueless forum, bless their bottomless pit of stupidity.

In the 'Miscellaneous NASA Comedies' thread, alluded to in previous Stundie nominations I believe, there is a beautiful photograph of Saturn, taken by a passing Voyager probe.

Today, in response to that photograph, we have this

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1583#p2382565



So, Jupiter, when I saw it last weekend, complete with Galilean moons and beautiful banding, must have been painted on the binoculars, spotting scope and tabletop telescope by those evil NASA types.
Nope, sorry if it's not on the internet it doesn't exist. Binoculars, hah, what next? "Radio" Telescopes?
 
On the DI forum there's a thread about the measles outbreak in Wales. Fortunately someone is on hand to explain the science:

"all viruses are defined as spores, spores are the seeds of fungus, fungi can change its fruiting bodies and affects by using different sub-straights"

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=241627
"sub-straights"??? What are those? Is that like closet heterosexuals?
 
Aaah the Clueless forum, bless their bottomless pit of stupidity.

In the 'Miscellaneous NASA Comedies' thread, alluded to in previous Stundie nominations I believe, there is a beautiful photograph of Saturn, taken by a passing Voyager probe.

Today, in response to that photograph, we have this

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1583#p2382565



So, Jupiter, when I saw it last weekend, complete with Galilean moons and beautiful banding, must have been painted on the binoculars, spotting scope and tabletop telescope by those evil NASA types.

Reminds me of a stundie some time ago when the nominee was stunned by the fact he saw the moon during the day, thus in his tortured mind only proved that it was fake and the moon didn't actually exist.
 
Reminds me of a stundie some time ago when the nominee was stunned by the fact he saw the moon during the day, thus in his tortured mind only proved that it was fake and the moon didn't actually exist.

There are a few fundamentalist Christians that insist you can't see the Moon during the day because the Bible refers to "the moon and stars to rule by night:"
 
Aaah the Clueless forum, bless their bottomless pit of stupidity.

In the 'Miscellaneous NASA Comedies' thread, alluded to in previous Stundie nominations I believe, there is a beautiful photograph of Saturn, taken by a passing Voyager probe.

Today, in response to that photograph, we have this

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1583#p2382565



So, Jupiter, when I saw it last weekend, complete with Galilean moons and beautiful banding, must have been painted on the binoculars, spotting scope and tabletop telescope by those evil NASA types.

Aren't those images usually compilations of lots of photos?
 
Aren't those images usually compilations of lots of photos?

Indeed, as are the best of most terrestrially based photographs of astronomical phenomena. In that thread someone fiddled around with the Saturn image and found lots of evidence that it was just that, and couldn't understand it.

In a sense I can understand a lack of knowledge, it's the complete lack of willingness to find out, or (having found out) just toss the explanation aside with a "well I just don't believe that nonsense".
 
Here's a sublime piece of material from the ever reliable WTC Dust.

The question by spanx followed by the stundie.



Thank god we don't suffer from this lack of progress. We would still be in the stone age!
Wow, even our resident shroudie works faster than that!
 
The Cluelessforum continues to supply the teat from which we can all suckle, and while I was tempted to nominate the truly asinine 'analysis' of the solar panels on the ISS (where they actually seem to believe that NASA has several different models and hope no-one notices), this complete collection of total non sequiters is quite barking in its derangedness:

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=720&start=825



That's right, the fact that a politician's husband is an astronaut AND has a twin brother who is also an astronaut is complete proof of the existence of Gil Scott Heron, and oh aren't they clever in the way they thought of a new name for astronauts.

A little further down that same thread,

Weird. I wonder if Scott might be playing his own fictional twin brother? Or if both are fake, and this is some attempt to transition us from twisted-face sims to more realistic (well, let's just say less surreal) sims?

:jaw-dropp
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom