Biscuit
Philosopher
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2007
- Messages
- 6,929
I hope that Mark Kelly uses the Buzz Aldrin method of dealing with these idiots.
That would be so sweet. I would like for those guys to talk to any astronaut and explain their theories.
I hope that Mark Kelly uses the Buzz Aldrin method of dealing with these idiots.
Have'nt you seen "Wag The Dog",Sheeple?
A great many of the Tin Foil Brigade are convinced that "Wag The Dog" is a docudrama.
Mother of all double standards. "oh me GERD vacinashawn cause AUTISM!!!" is instantly believed without question, whereas "all my children are vaccinated, and none 'caught' autism" is met with suspicion and contempt.
bingo
Since when did steel beams bend without ripping at the joints?
Yea who ever heard of curved steel?
link
There is actually a really funny photo analysis in that thread where they point out evidence that a still image taken from a digital video is actually 2 cops running in front of a green screen. The shoulder badge is labeled as a "Missing Fragment."
Can you provide a link or post up your research.
I have seen your avatar and the two pictures you provided, is that all of your research ?
Thank god we don't suffer from this lack of progress. We would still be in the stone age!Yes. The avatar and two pictures is the sum total of what I've been able to discover in 11.5 years. I'm a very slow worker.
You don't understand conservation of momentum, then.
In a collision between two objects...
Force ------> equals exactly
<------ Force
In the scenario being discussed, an airplane imparting a force in the northerly direction (having impacted the south face of WTC 2 as it was moving north) would have resulted in plane parts and debris traveling in the southerly direction. This was not seen.
Conservation of momentum doesn't mean the plane keeps going.
This Saturn image has always bugged me. Just to be able to get the entire planet in frame, let alone focused,the camera would have to be so far away as to render the image, well, unimaginable. The lighting is also entirely unbelievable. Do these planets even exist? We'll have to take their word for it...
You don't understand conservation of momentum, then.
In a collision between two objects...
Force ------> equals exactly
<------ Force
In the scenario being discussed, an airplane imparting a force in the northerly direction (having impacted the south face of WTC 2 as it was moving north) would have resulted in plane parts and debris traveling in the southerly direction. This was not seen.
Conservation of momentum doesn't mean the plane keeps going.
Nope, sorry if it's not on the internet it doesn't exist. Binoculars, hah, what next? "Radio" Telescopes?Aaah the Clueless forum, bless their bottomless pit of stupidity.
In the 'Miscellaneous NASA Comedies' thread, alluded to in previous Stundie nominations I believe, there is a beautiful photograph of Saturn, taken by a passing Voyager probe.
Today, in response to that photograph, we have this
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1583#p2382565
So, Jupiter, when I saw it last weekend, complete with Galilean moons and beautiful banding, must have been painted on the binoculars, spotting scope and tabletop telescope by those evil NASA types.
WTF Dust obviously has never seen a Newton's cradle
"sub-straights"??? What are those? Is that like closet heterosexuals?On the DI forum there's a thread about the measles outbreak in Wales. Fortunately someone is on hand to explain the science:
"all viruses are defined as spores, spores are the seeds of fungus, fungi can change its fruiting bodies and affects by using different sub-straights"
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=241627
Your link just says "link" and doesn't actually take you anywhere. I smell a conspiracy!![]()
Aaah the Clueless forum, bless their bottomless pit of stupidity.
In the 'Miscellaneous NASA Comedies' thread, alluded to in previous Stundie nominations I believe, there is a beautiful photograph of Saturn, taken by a passing Voyager probe.
Today, in response to that photograph, we have this
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1583#p2382565
So, Jupiter, when I saw it last weekend, complete with Galilean moons and beautiful banding, must have been painted on the binoculars, spotting scope and tabletop telescope by those evil NASA types.
Reminds me of a stundie some time ago when the nominee was stunned by the fact he saw the moon during the day, thus in his tortured mind only proved that it was fake and the moon didn't actually exist.
Aaah the Clueless forum, bless their bottomless pit of stupidity.
In the 'Miscellaneous NASA Comedies' thread, alluded to in previous Stundie nominations I believe, there is a beautiful photograph of Saturn, taken by a passing Voyager probe.
Today, in response to that photograph, we have this
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1583#p2382565
So, Jupiter, when I saw it last weekend, complete with Galilean moons and beautiful banding, must have been painted on the binoculars, spotting scope and tabletop telescope by those evil NASA types.
Aren't those images usually compilations of lots of photos?
Wow, even our resident shroudie works faster than that!Here's a sublime piece of material from the ever reliable WTC Dust.
The question by spanx followed by the stundie.
Thank god we don't suffer from this lack of progress. We would still be in the stone age!
The Cluelessforum continues to supply the teat from which we can all suckle, and while I was tempted to nominate the truly asinine 'analysis' of the solar panels on the ISS (where they actually seem to believe that NASA has several different models and hope no-one notices), this complete collection of total non sequiters is quite barking in its derangedness:
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=720&start=825
That's right, the fact that a politician's husband is an astronaut AND has a twin brother who is also an astronaut is complete proof of the existence of Gil Scott Heron, and oh aren't they clever in the way they thought of a new name for astronauts.
Weird. I wonder if Scott might be playing his own fictional twin brother? Or if both are fake, and this is some attempt to transition us from twisted-face sims to more realistic (well, let's just say less surreal) sims?
