September Stundie Nominations

I once had a 1967 BMW convertible that I was going to restore.

Then the old lady that gave it to me died and it turned out the "gift" of the car had legal issues. So I lost it. Still bugs me.

Anyways, take it from me that a story about the car you almost had is pretty much never interesting to a young woman.

Also, don't ask to see her mom's ass so you know what you are getting into for the long haul. That...........causes much unpleasantness.

SOOO Anders is railing against reality again?
 
That's another question. The amoeba's world may be a blaze of light. It would be none of my business. But we can quite easily imagine an amoeba world of objects that is quite beyond our ken. The darling rivulets, sudden changes of direction, the things they do.

Jonesboy, "Mythbusters 2"

Which has nothing to do with myths being busted, or mythbusters.
 
Erock said:
http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060232471&postcount=1485

"The film Independence Day proved Aliens can invade Earth. Now we need a film proving they can invade the Universe. It's already been proven they can invade Earth."


oooer:jaw-dropp
Click to expand...

Even within the bounds of allowing those dope-smoking dipstick Icke nutbags to be nominated this one should be disqualified. "Phrased Eyebrow" (a 'Paul is dead' theorist) is yanking your chain. He's descended to low-effort trolling.

Nominate the "where's the shadow" post instead. That's classic Stelios.
 
anthonyc31 said:
anyhoo said:
Anthony, I really hate to ask a dumb question like this, but if the towers collapsed due to large underground nuclear explosions, as those diagrams so clearly indicate, then why do we see the destruction start at the top and go to the bottom instead of the destruction starting at the bottom and going to the top?
Click to expand...


Very good question. I'll do my best to answer ....

When the 150kt underground nuclear charges went off, they instantaneously created the following 3 zones:

1. Cavity - 100m hermetically sealed cavity, rock is melted and turned to gas, the gas is heated to temperatures over 10k+ degrees and it is very radioactive

2. Crushed Zone - turns matter to dust, traveled up the tower ~300m (@ 400km / sec)

3. Damaged Zone - turns matter to small rubble, traveled up the tower ~50m past the Crushed Zone

This leaves ~50m of the very top of the WTC 1 and 2 towers virtually undamaged. It is this undamaged section that begins to fall down through the rest of the destroyed building. First it falls through the Damaged zone (where the "planes"/explosives went off), continuing down through the Crushed Zone which is total dust. That dust is what we see being blown through various sections that we have all mistaken to be "thermite explosions". It's just dust being blow out.

Note, according to Dimitri the dustified material from the Crushing wave retains form and color until it is acted upon by some other force. In the case of WTC 1 and 2, that other force is the top section of the tower falling.

WTC 7 is different because the 300m "Crushed Zone" ran up WTC 7 entirely. It started the collapse a bit slower, but it started from the base of the building, which did not look the same as WTC 1 and 2.


And watch this short video clip to see where Dimitri calculated that the charges were actually located. They were not placed directly under each building, but rather off to the side, which caused distinct damage to other WTC buildings and Fiterman Hall. Nobody has been able to explain the massive damage to these buildings beyond saying it was "debris from WTC 1 and 2", which is nonsense:
Click to expand...


:boxedin:

I removed the links at the beginning and near the end of the post.

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060221311&postcount=42
 
Hang on - So gassified rock fits in the same space as the solid rock that was there before?
:boggled:
 
LGR and Anders: Two woo tastes that taste stundieful together!

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7608247&postcount=8
Originally Posted by little grey rabbit
I have often been accused of talking out of my rear, but didn't the need for relativity arise because light from the stars seemed to travel at the same speed regardless of how fast an individual star was moving relative to the Earth? Or am I hopelessly confused again?

It looks like dark matter might be up poo creek also
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14948730
Click to expand...


I think the redshift observed in astronomy is caused by friction between photons and the vacuum energy. That could explain how the light from stars have the same speed without the need for Einstein's relativity theories or dark energy.
Click to expand...

For once, LGR sounds sensible and rational. See what wooful power Anders wields?

I nominate the bolded bit
 
When the going gets stupid:

ergo said:
Sword_Of_Truth said:
I don't know why I'm doing this, this is a lot of work for someone who will ignore it, wait a week (or an hour) and then lie like a used car salesman pretending it was never brought up... but for the sake of putting the "E" in "JREF", I'm doing it anyway.

Ergo, this is a rough approximation of how the outer three rings of the Pentagon are built:

heydumbass.jpg
Click to expand...
Again. Look at the path shown by the entry and exit ("punchout") points. It does not pass through the building at a 90 deg. angle. Therefore, it does not simply pass through your supposed open floor plan in a straight line, the way you try to suggest with your 1-D illustration.
Click to expand...

(bolding added by me)
 
I think 1D illustration has the potential to become a whole new art form.

This one is called "Dreaming of the bandicoot":




.
 
Is somebody throwing a cat?


Oh and I suppose you think that things said in public should not be subject to ridicule?
 
grmcdorman said:
You know it's deep woo when LGR is the voice of reason by comparison.
Click to expand...

Ergo admitted to serious error and Childlike Empress said "I stand corrected" over matters of fact today.

Is this the dawning of the age of Aquarius or something?
 
GlennB said:
Ergo admitted to serious error and Childlike Empress said "I stand corrected" over matters of fact today.

Is this the dawning of the age of Aquarius or something?
Click to expand...


That was not the first time, but it's correct that you think it's noteworthy. I'm seldomly mistaken. :)
 
Last edited:
Travis, I got this off of one of your threads....

NIST reported maximum upper layer air temperatures of about 1,000 degrees Celsius (1,800 degrees Fahrenheit) in the WTC towers (for example, see NCSTAR 1, Figure 6-36)." They made no exceptions, no qualifications, (i.e well in the debris..etc). I don't or any "truther" need to say anymore than what NIST has already said.
Click to expand...

Just for fun...:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom