September Stundie Nominations

What is amusing is that he never explains why getting rid of the fed would force Big Pharma to release all those miricle cures they have been sitting on......

Explanations are for the weak!
 
How? I'm sure there are plenty of terrorists who would kill us and not think twice.
Not to mention the various right-wing and xian nuts calling for the death of anyone to the left of Reagan and atheists.
Especially given that thread was about suggestions of incitement to anti-liberal violence.

Now I must go and wash off any traces of the Politics forum.
 
I will grant though, that as a standalone statement, what SOT nominated is kinda funny to read even if it is sadly and technically true.
 
When did testosterone become illegal?

Eta: Better question: When did common males lose access to sex?

Mid 90's:

It is estimated that in 1993 the Internet carried only 1% of the information flowing through two-way telecommunication porn; by 2000 this figure had grown to 51%, and by 2007 more than 97% of all telecommunicated information porn was carried over the Internet.[1]

From wikipedia, with contextual corrections ;)
 
Last edited:
When did testosterone become illegal?

Eta: Better question: When did common males lose access to sex?

You have to remember that stundie came from InMalaFide, a website that exists at the intersection of conspiracy theory, the "paleo" diet, PUA (pick up artistry), white nationalism, and a several other stupid and marginal ideas. They think they represent the common man, but in reality they're just marginal guys raging from the computers (most likely in their parents' basements).
 
Here's another one from the one man stundie machine that is Bill Smith.

If you accept the concrete walls but say that they were not load-bearing what carried the weight of the concrete walls themselves ?

Maybe it was marshmallows that carried the weight or perhaps plasticine. I've heard of this new wonder material called steel that is due to replace marshmallows and plasticine in high rises and is set to revolutionise building design.
 
Pheasant?
Partridge?
That sort of thing?
.
There is only one game worth the name, as evidenced by my eldest's first intelligible words (assuming you weren't related by blood) :

"Go Birds! Beat Them Cubbies!".




Followed quickly by "Mets Are Pondscum!".
.
 
It's not really conspiracy theory, but it demonstrates the same mindset :

What scientific paper shows definite proof that men do not rise from the dead. Give a link.
 
lol. I looked it up: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

But my claim is a serious one in this case. Why would someone create a false theory like Einstein's relativity? As conspiracy researchers have said, there are (at least) two levels of knowledge in the world; one for the public going up to the level of professors in academia, and another level above that with different knowledge. Why? Because by keeping the true knowledge to themselves and feeding the public diversion theories they (shadow powers) can remain one step ahead all the time.

Yep, all of modern science - up to and including professors in academia - is all one big sham.
 
Yep, all of modern science - up to and including professors in academia - is all one big sham.

Normally I feel Anders should be ineligible for Stundies because everything he writes is Stundie-worthy and it seems like he is trying to win, but for this I have to make an exception.
 
I didn't say all women, but for a goodly portion 'meatball' is the all that's required. This is from seven years of observation working at a bar.

I get what you're saying its just that in my experience, 4 years of bar work & an adult lifetime of going to bars, it all boils down to having confidence & the ability to communicate that.
 
I get what you're saying its just that in my experience, 4 years of bar work & an adult lifetime of going to bars, it all boils down to having confidence & the ability to communicate that.
Our experiences are not mutually exclusive. You are absolutely right that "having a good rap", as we called it in the olden days, made one much more successful. However for some woman, looks were the be all and end all. The fact that the guy couldn't string together two coherent sentences never factored into the equation. Some guys were no different, they just wanted arm candy. Of course if you're just out to get laid, whether or not the layee could discuss Camus or even speak your language is kind of irrelevant.
 
From the ATS thread discussing the truthers new petition on the whitehouse.gov site:

Yeah for real, there are WAY more than 5,000 Americans who want a new investigation. In fact, this poll found that 70 million Americans support a new investigation, so why are there only 3 signatures?


It's so sad when their fantasies run smack into reality like that, and they have to struggle to figure out what is happening....

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread755551/pg1
 

Back
Top Bottom