September Stundie Nominations

[off topic]

Travis, you have probably told this hundreds of times before, but thanks for keeping this going, month after month and year after year.

As an Admin come Mod on another Board, I have a feel as to how much work is involved, and also believe that what you do is above and beyond the call of duty.

Thanks

[/off topic]

Norm

Seconded.
 
There's a secret plot to keep men from having sex:
http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2011...-rather-than-create-new-wealth/#comment-70405

This makes sense when you consider that most pharmaceuticals and treatments that would help the plight of the common man as also made illegal by our glorious fearless elite overlords.

I don’t want to change the subject completely but the elite hate all commoners (READ: BETA MALES) who seek to advance or better themselves:

For example, I am in the Fitness/Personal Training industry and I don’t for the life of me understand why testosterone is illegal. Research has shown that testosterone IS what it means to be male. And yet it is illegal to purchase. Same thing with Ephedra based fat burners, Anabolic Steroids, HGH, and even Erectile Dysunction treatments.

The elite don’t want common beta males to have access to better their lives and have access to sex.
 
1) My dad takes testosterone supplements so I don't see how it is really illegal.

2) Too much of the stuff is bad for you.

3) What is he on about with erectile dysfunction treatments being illegal?
 
When did testosterone become illegal?

Eta: Better question: When did common males lose access to sex?
 
Last edited:
When did testosterone become illegal?

Eta: Better question: When did common males lose access to sex?

Since when would taking testosterone help me bed more gals? Does it make me more charming, or look better? Improve my confidence or social standing?
 
1) My dad takes testosterone supplements so I don't see how it is really illegal.

2) Too much of the stuff is bad for you.

3) What is he on about with erectile dysfunction treatments being illegal?

Maybe he means that since its not free to everyone, it is effectively illegal? That's the only thing I can come up with...
 

Fourthed. And respect to you too, Travis, for continuing to provoke such excellent Stundie material, like this example from tmd2_1:

I'm not saying there was no molten steel, you are without a doubt trying to be deceptive and twist words around. What I'm saying is if there was a "furnace" taking place, there would have had to have been reports of molten steel. My personal belief is that there was molten steel, it wasn't reported becuase it would be known that it shouldn't have been possible (ie even with your furnace) If this furnace was possible I'm sure they would have loved to report it or at least say it was possible (molten steel that is). Because if it were indeed possible, it couldn't be used as evidence by CTs.

If I read this right, he's saying that the reports of molten steel at ground zero prove a conspiracy because there weren't any reports of molten steel from ground zero, and the fact that these reports were suppressed proves that reports of molten steel would prove a conspiracy because if molten steel were possible then it would be reported as part of the conspiracy. Therefore, the fact that there weren't any reports of molten steel demonstrates that the reports of molten steel that there actually were must prove a conspiracy, and all this only rests on the starting assumption that there must have been a conspiracy. Or something. My head's starting to hurt now.

It's an entertaining new spin on both the old truther arguments of circular reasoning and heads-I-win, tails-you-lose; he's not only claiming that he wins whether the coin falls heads or tails, he's also claiming that the coin came down both heads and tails, and his evidence for this is the assumption that he won the toss.

Dave
 
If I read this right, he's saying that the reports of molten steel at ground zero prove a conspiracy because there weren't any reports of molten steel from ground zero, and the fact that these reports were suppressed proves that reports of molten steel would prove a conspiracy because if molten steel were possible then it would be reported as part of the conspiracy. Therefore, the fact that there weren't any reports of molten steel demonstrates that the reports of molten steel that there actually were must prove a conspiracy, and all this only rests on the starting assumption that there must have been a conspiracy. Or something. My head's starting to hurt now.

It's an entertaining new spin on both the old truther arguments of circular reasoning and heads-I-win, tails-you-lose; he's not only claiming that he wins whether the coin falls heads or tails, he's also claiming that the coin came down both heads and tails, and his evidence for this is the assumption that he won the toss.

Dave

I'm honestly wondering why there isn't smoke coming out of my ears as I tried to comprehend wtf he is trying to say.
 
Maybe he means that since its not free to everyone, it is effectively illegal? That's the only thing I can come up with...

I think he may be conflating illegal with controlled as in you need a prescription, you can't just walk into your local deli and get a pound of testosterone. (Beta males would never go to a pharmacy, too much female stuff in there.)
 
For example, I am in the Fitness/Personal Training industry and I don’t for the life of me understand why testosterone is illegal. Research has shown that testosterone IS what it means to be male. And yet it is illegal to purchase. Same thing with Ephedra based fat burners, Anabolic Steroids, HGH, and even Erectile Dysunction treatments.


I'm assuming that since he knows all these are illegal, this overweight muscleless erectile-dysfunctioning beta male has at one point tried to buy them.
 
Since when would taking testosterone help me bed more gals? Does it make me more charming, or look better? Improve my confidence or social standing?

I'm guessing he thinks that women only want to have sex with meatheads. :con2:
 

Back
Top Bottom