• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Saudi journalist disappears in embassy, believed murdered

Is everyone in power just getting dumber by the day? This seems like childishly incompetent lack of subtlety on both the Saudi and Turkish side. Aren't diplomatic assassinations normally a bit more sophisticated?
 
Last edited:
Is everyone in power just getting dumber by the day? This seems like childishly incompetent lack of subtlety on both the Saudi and Turkish side. Aren't diplomatic assassinations normally a bit more sophisticated?

Perhaps in the current climate of alt-facts distortion fields and outrage fatigue, subtlety and effort are redundant.
 
A consulate with bugs inside. Im shocked.

According to the Turks the CCTV footage from inside of the consulate was smuggled out of the country and into Saudi Arabia.

If they really transported this out of the country, instead of simply destroying the material or just turning the CCTV system off, It's quite possible that one or more of the Crown Prince's countless enemies decided to leak this. It could also been a heroic rogue whistleblower or a spy a working for Turkey.
 
Con Coughlin the Telegraph's Defence Editor, fresh from dinner party with the Saudis tweets

"Was Jamal Khashoggi a liberal or a Muslim Brotherhood lackey who reviled the West?"

and

"This is a must read for anyone who wants to understand what Jamal Khashoggi was really about, and his questionable Muslim Brotherhood agenda"

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/10/10/saudi-journalist-jamal-khashoggi-victim-middle-east-rivalry/amp/

He's a true patriot doing whatever it takes to defend those precious arms procurement contracts worth 1000 trillions of pounds. Without them Britain would be nothing... NOTHING!

He's clearly not a Saudi mouthpiece who parrots their propaganda all the time and whitewashes them.
 
Last edited:
According to the Turks the CCTV footage from inside of the consulate was smuggled out of the country and into Saudi Arabia.

If they really transported this out of the country, instead of simply destroying the material or just turning the CCTV system off, It's quite possible that one or more of the Crown Prince's countless enemies decided to leak this. It could also been a heroic rogue whistleblower or a spy a working for Turkey.

Understood one source is audio. Could be a bug inside or a laser reflection modulated off a window etc.
 
Understood one source is audio. Could be a bug inside or a laser reflection modulated off a window etc.

Since this is a consulate of a very important country i would be very, very surprised if they had not placed the it under intense 24/7 surveillance. Not just by surrounding it by CCTV cameras and placing hidden microphones outside but also very likely including bugging it and having one or more Saudi informants working within.
 
Is everyone in power just getting dumber by the day? This seems like childishly incompetent lack of subtlety on both the Saudi and Turkish side. Aren't diplomatic assassinations normally a bit more sophisticated?



There was a time when they had to be subtle, because there were actual consequences for being caught being too blatant about murdering your opponents. But that time is no more. They've seen that their supporters will let them get away with just about anything, no matter how blatant it is, and, to quote Montgomery Burns, they've decided to wallow in their own crapulence.
 
there is a logic to kidnapping or murdering a dissident in an embassy.
No police allowed, the person can be put in a diplomat's car and taken to a Saudi plane etc.

But the downside is also massive: the murder is directly tied to the nation, there will be surveillance, there's their own CCTV system. plausible deniability is out the window.

I bet they wished they'd just knifed him in front of his own apartment.

You can say they don't care, but SA needs foreign investment and some kind of good PR in many countries.

I saw on TV yesterday that there have been multiple abductions of dissidents from Paris and Geneva. Usually by drugging the person and taking them to SA to be thrown in jail.
 
Is everyone in power just getting dumber by the day? This seems like childishly incompetent lack of subtlety on both the Saudi and Turkish side. Aren't diplomatic assassinations normally a bit more sophisticated?

Assassinations seldom go as well as planned.

Normally, during assassinations there are difficulties with weapons, difficulties with identifying the target, difficulties with timing, difficulties with unforeseen eventualities, and so on.

In any case, I am sure that the Saudis would have preferred to kill Khashoggi when he was well outside of their consulate and in such a way that the murder could not be traced back to Saudi Arabia. However, I expect that for some reason they had to act quickly to kill Khashoggi while he was in their consulate (which is an environment that the Saudis could control) and because his identity was clearly established (which eliminated to possibility of killing the wrong man).
 
Since this is a consulate of a very important country i would be very, very surprised if they had not placed the it under intense 24/7 surveillance. Not just by surrounding it by CCTV cameras and placing hidden microphones outside but also very likely including bugging it and having one or more Saudi informants working within.

An important country and one the Turkish government has had distrust and tension with.
 
CNN reports that it has been reported that the reporter's Apple Watch recorded the assassination. Did you like that sentence?

CNN said:
Upon noticing the watch, Sabah reports, Khashoggi's assailants tried to unlock the Apple Watch with multiple password attempts, ultimately using Khashoggi's fingerprint to unlock the smart watch. They were successful in deleting only some of the files, Sabah reported.

https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/10/12/middleeast/khashoggi-saudi-turkey-recordings-intl/index.html
 
If you have the time for this:

It has been established through a proverbial anonymous source of the Washington Post, as is linked and cited in the article.

Then perhaps you could make time for this:

How do you know it didn't happen? There's nothing in that article to support that idea.

Is the question too awkward, or is there another reason you are shying away from answering it?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom