• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Satanic Sculpture at Illinois Statehouse.

This is the last reply because you absolutely refuse to admit that you may be wrong in your interpretation of what they are doing. And my understanding of what your point is will clearly always be wrong because no one else in this thread can be right but you. You are just going to keep insisting that we are all purposely?? misinterpreting what you are saying.

And I did not freewheel complain, you asked about others experiences with christians in an earlier post. But I guess if I didn't quote it, it didn't happen.

No. You said I am dripping with disdain...for a group I wholeheartedly support. That is skimming posts, lifting keywords, and passing judgment.

A d for Christ's sake, of course I may be wrong. But I do not hold the positions I am being lambasted for. Y'all declare yourselves mind readers. Its freaking infuriating.
 
Let's just all agree that whatever Thermal's point is we all support it and agree with him 100%, but it's rude of him to post about it here and does his cause more harm than good.

Does that satisfy everyone? If not, why not? I'm actually making what I'd otherwise call a point if it weren't as blunt as a sledgehammer.

Thermal: yeah, these guys have every right to do what they are doing but they're kind of being dicks about it

TM: You hate gays and Pride Parades!

Yeah, the problem is totally me.

But you know what? You win. I'll withdraw my totally serious sculpture donated by the Church of the Swinging Johnson and have this battle another time. The mob wins!

And neither of us will appreciate that final irony.
 
No! Stop! Its over! There was no actual discussion, but it's ******** over!

Wait! Before it's over I just want to extend an invitation to any skyclad witches out there looking for a yard to celebrate in during the next solstice. Mi yarda es tu yarda.

Unlike some, I'm open minded about non-Christian practices of holiday celebrations.
 
Wait! Before it's over I just want to extend an invitation to any skyclad witches out there looking for a yard to celebrate in during the next solstice. Mi yarda es tu yarda.

Unlike some, I'm open minded about non-Christian practices of holiday celebrations.


#BLM
Bare Ladies Matter
 
Things are getting interesting.

Illinois State Senator Paul Schimpf has formally requested the removal of snaketivity in the form of a letter to the Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White. State Representatives Terri Bryant and Rep Dave Severin have co-sponsored House resolution 1355, condemning the inclusion of the sculpture (while not outright calling for its removal). Oddly enough, all three are Republicans. Seretary of State White, who is sticking to his guns regarding the sculpture remaining, is a Democrat.

https://patch.com/illinois/springfield-il/il-state-senator-calls-satanist-display-be-removed

https://thesouthern.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/bryant-says-she-did-not-intend-to-say-satanists-are/article_94cf2e2b-c895-5d27-ab13-50b877fbd28e.html
 
"The Republicans are the ones that don't understand that other religions get to exist" isn't interesting. I think we all already knew that.
 
It's interesting that there is now a state senator trying to remove it. By all counts, he should know better. Likely he does, and this is just posturing.

They're still not a real religion, tho.
 
It's interesting that there is now a state senator trying to remove it. By all counts, he should know better. Likely he does, and this is just posturing.

They're still not a real religion, tho.

If Buddhism is a religion, then the satanic temple is.
 
If Buddhism is a religion, then the satanic temple is.

On what grounds? Did Buddhist founders go to an existing large religion, lift its names, imagery, and themes, then claim they don't believe in them while making it their stated mission to remove the influence of the larger sect?

The Satanic Temple is a secular challenge to the influence of Christianity, and a welcome one. They are not a religion in and of themselves.
 
On what grounds? Did Buddhist founders go to an existing large religion, lift its names, imagery, and themes, then claim they don't believe in them while making it their stated mission to remove the influence of the larger sect?

The Satanic Temple is a secular challenge to the influence of Christianity, and a welcome one. They are not a religion in and of themselves.

You describe Christianity and Christmas. Christianity and Judaism stole the themes from a number of religions (great flood, God creating a Demi God) while making it their stated mission to depose other religions (evangelism).
 
On what grounds? Did Buddhist founders go to an existing large religion, lift its names, imagery, and themes, then claim they don't believe in them while making it their stated mission to remove the influence of the larger sect?

Kind of. Buddhism sprang out of Hinduism. Christianity came out of Judaism. And Hinduism and Judaism came out of earlier religions. Very few religions are invented in a vacuum (like Scientology), most begin as offspring of older religions.
 
Kind of. Buddhism sprang out of Hinduism. Christianity came out of Judaism. And Hinduism and Judaism came out of earlier religions. Very few religions are invented in a vacuum (like Scientology), most begin as offspring of older religions.

Even Scientology is a culmination of American occultism that started in the mid 1800s. For example, After WW2 hubbard worked on occultism with Jack Parsons, a thelemite under aleister Crowley.
 
You describe Christianity and Christmas. Christianity and Judaism stole the themes from a number of religions (great flood, God creating a Demi God) while making it their stated mission to depose other religions (evangelism).

Disagreed. Their stated mission of Christianity is the salvation of its adherents, and conversion of the 'heathen'. Deposing is not actually on their to-do list, at least in theory.
 
Kind of. Buddhism sprang out of Hinduism. Christianity came out of Judaism. And Hinduism and Judaism came out of earlier religions. Very few religions are invented in a vacuum (like Scientology), most begin as offspring of older religions.

True, but those were not, as far as we know, systematically invented over coffee. The Temple is not a group of rebels or 'protestants' who left their sects as a splinter group. They are non-believers who pragmatically adopt the mechanisms of believers for socio-political gains.
 
Even Scientology is a culmination of American occultism that started in the mid 1800s. For example, After WW2 hubbard worked on occultism with Jack Parsons, a thelemite under aleister Crowley.

*I wouldn't consider Scientology a religion either, as much as a cult. Definitions get a little slippery, conceded in advance
 
True, but those were not, as far as we know, systematically invented over coffee. The Temple is not a group of rebels or 'protestants' who left their sects as a splinter group. They are non-believers who pragmatically adopt the mechanisms of believers for socio-political gains.

I would bet most of them are Protestants who left their sect.
 
The Christians a working hard... Are they as big a dick as the Satanists, yet?

Christians have traditionally been the biggest dicks around for centuries, also conceded. They are the freaking Johnny Holmes of religiosity, agreed. In the original Roman, they are the Biggus Dickus.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom