Thermal
August Member
I would bet most of them are Protestants who left their sect.
Left, and summarily rejected in toto. Not evolved from, per the other examples.
I would bet most of them are Protestants who left their sect.
Left, and summarily rejected in toto. Not evolved from, per the other examples.
Distinction without a difference.
It's funny to claim to be the religion of no-religion. You could shave with that edge. I did when I was a teenager.
Edge? It’s the near unanimous opinion expressed by the vocally religious towards anyone who says out loud they’re atheist. I’d call it more like rolling with the punch than being edgy.
Major difference, in the context of whether or not they are a religion.
TST has summarily rejected all tenets of religion and religious thought...and claimed to be a religion of it. The other examples embraced the spirituality or trancendency or whatever of their sects.
It's funny to claim to be the religion of no-religion. You could shave with that edge. I did when I was a teenager.
And then added a bunch of stuff. I'm an atheist and I'm not signing up for their substitute ethos and substituted beliefs.
The stuff they added is satirical window dressing, not substance. The t-shirt you wear need not reflect your core belief system.
The Church of Satan, IIRC, still plays at some kind of ritual magic. They would fit more closely to an actual religion, if also ultimately a send-up.
The idea that religion belongs to supernaturalists is ignorant, backward, and offensive. The metaphorical Satanic construct is no more arbitrary to us than are the deeply held beliefs that we actively advocate. Are we supposed to believe that those who pledge submission to an ethereal supernatural deity hold to their values more deeply than we? Are we supposed to concede that only the superstitious are rightful recipients of religious exemption and privilege? Satanism provides all that a religion should without a compulsory attachment to untenable items of faith-based belief. It provides a narrative structure by which we contextualize our lives and works. It also provides a body of symbolism and religious practice — a sense of identity, culture, community, and shared values.
This is their argument
I do not have a narrative structure or engage in religious practice. They do. And it separates them from me.
Satirical window dressing is no different than the fake gods worshipped by other religions.
Not sure I'm following you. You think TST is being pushed around by the Christians, or at least somebody? TST seems to be the more aggressive thorn in the paw, AFAICS.
I just mean I don’t think that “ok fine, I’ll play by what you’re going to call me anyway” is what “being edgy” is. It’s more, idk, embracing the straw man.
You're not even remotely familiar with the concept of Abrahamic religion, are you? Christianity? Islam? Protestant reformation? Church of England?Disagreed. Their stated mission of Christianity is the salvation of its adherents, and conversion of the 'heathen'. Deposing is not actually on their to-do list, at least in theory.
You're not even remotely familiar with the concept of Abrahamic religion, are you? Christianity? Islam? Protestant reformation? Church of England?
#BLM
Bare Ladies Matter
Sure, you say that now, but when the skyclad dicks show up you'll find yourself doubting the sincerity of their beliefs.Always. No matter how cruel, brutal and domineering the Christian majority is, no matter how long the Christians and their brain washed minions try and shame women concerning their unclad bodies, no matter how many evil people try and silence alternative beliefs to their own, my yard is and always will be open to the skyclad wiccans and their apprentices.
#BLM
Sure, you say that now, but when the skyclad dicks show up you'll find yourself doubting the sincerity of their beliefs.
You seem a little fixated on penis displays. Are you aware that there's religions with exactly that?I knew you'd come around. Some swingin' skyclad schlong puts socio-religious rudeness right into perspective