Roosevelt and Churchill had decided in August that the "Germany First" policy would the over-arching strategy. We were de facto at war with Germany in the Atlantic already. And there were calls for a declaration of war against Germany on the floor of Congress the day we voted for war against Japan. It was going to happen, we would have been at war with Germany in weeks if not days. Mr. Gallup had already told us Germany was considered the greater threat by the public. For example:The USA would have been forced into Europe once Pearl happened,regardless of Hitler declaring war on us or not, because we needed the help of the allied powers in the Pacific and we weren't gonna get it without reciprocating in Europe.
The USA would have been forced into Europe once Pearl happened,regardless of Hitler declaring war on us or not, because we needed the help of the allied powers in the Pacific...
What help did the U.S. need? The war against Japan was almost entirely an American effort.
What help did the U.S. need? The war against Japan was almost entirely an American effort.
The US would have declared war on Germany and Italy even if Hitler and Mussolini hadn't declared war on the US first. It might have taken a few months, but I suspect the actual time would have been much less, probably just long enough for an extended debate in Congress.
Calls for war against "the Axis powers" were made on Dec. 7th, based on the assumption that Japan would not have acted without the consent and encouragement of the Germans.
Not to mention the idea that the "inferior" Japanese couldn't have pulled off such a complicated operation without the help of white men.![]()
And the Pacific got less than half of our effort. One-hand-tied time. The individual Japanese soldier was a fierce warrior, but he was lead by fools.
Tis true, the USA had superior leadership and seemed to maintain logistical support at a much higher success rate than the Japanese. Who, after Midway, seemed to lose their minds.
What help did the U.S. need? The war against Japan was almost entirely an American effort.
I think my Uncle who spent over 3 years in Burma would argue against that, so would many thousands of Indian, Australian and New Zealand troops.
There were more than 20 Indian Divisions, more than 10 Australian plus the British Divisions.
About 87,000 Indian soldiers lost their lives. Indian soldiers won 30 Victoria Crosses.
They lost their minds in September of 1941, latest. The Japan of the 1930s should stand as a blazing example of why it is bad to let the military dictate foreign policy to the Government. The Army would not allow loss of face that would come with withdrawing from China, so the China Incident turned into a black hole they couldn't escape from. It all revolved around the egos of the military men and every year they'd tell the Emperor they only needed one more year to wrap things up. The fact that Tojo was Prime Minister AND Army Minister while on active duty with the Army on Dec. 7th, 1941, says it all, IMNSHO.
A few years ago, if I remember correctly, there was a book from a good university press that claimed that Nazi Germany did indeed have eventual designs on the US and moving into the western hemisphere. But they were long term plans and involved building aircraft carriers and long range bombers.
We don't get much about the Kokoda Trail over here. Or the CBI. I'm trying to fix that, following Patrick's lead, at Hyperwar.
*cough* Proofreaders needed! *cough*
I might have ti have a look at Hyperwar.
In the meantine Battle of Kohima the 'Stalingrad of the East'
and the simultaneous Battle of Imphal
Turning point of the Burma Campaign, over 21,000 Commonwealth casualties and more than 59,000 Japanese.
*cough* Proofreaders needed! *cough*