Do you have proof of any of this? Is that too much to ask? Or should I believe YOU and not him because you repeat yourself? I mean if he is a conman, one as bad as you say, surely there must be proof, and since you are so big on having proof before believing something, how am I the bad guy for wanting proof before I believe something which you hold as self evident? Why hasn't he been charged if he is such a conman?
I think if he had been you guys would show that right off the bat instead of attacking those who ask you for proof of your beliefs. Right?
No offense intended, but I think maybe the people here are not quite the skeptical critical thinkers they think they are. You attack just like others who have beliefs unsupported by evidence when those beliefs are questioned.