Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mojo said:
There's also the whole "because the definition says that persons includes corporations human beings aren't persons" thing.
Click to expand...



Yeah, probably this.

Remember, internal consistency is not a major requirement.
 
JLord said:
I was under the impression that you were either all in, or all out in terms of your acceptance of statute law.
Click to expand...



On this aspect, I think you're wrong. Menard has made it clear (at least by his behavior) that he considers statute law to a buffet style thing - take what you want, ignore the rest. See his use of Copyright against JB, for example.
 
Yep its the pick and mix approach all right.

It's totally devoid of sense or reason, Rob says he can consent to, or ignore any statute at will, yet when he uses statutes against an individual or corporation he claims as it's their law they have to obey it, he still hasn't sensibly explained why they cant withdraw consent though.

Perhaps he will shed some light on that when he returns as well.
 
I think he's probably too busy either:
Googling for more childish nonsense to "research"
or
Has "lost" his laptop again.

I'm sure his vacation should have ended by now.

Either way he certainly seems hell bent on embarrassing himself with his latest silly offerings.
 
Honestly, I'm not anxious for him to return if he doesn't have anything new to say. As amusing as his posts can be sometimes, it's boring to see him trot out the same debunked points again and again.
 
jargon buster said:
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/


He may wish to explain why his sites been down for 3 days as well :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Well the members' section is still up, not that anyone ever posts there.
Interestingly the most recent, (there have been a couple this year), posts are from a very irate, (and somewhat illiterate), member complaining about the public forum being down and that the "Society" tells lies.
Quite a slagging match!

Rob seems to have updated this pile of nonsense with his two-girls-video though.

I do have to wonder who pays WKD1 Hosting for hosting his imaginary Canadian Consumers "I know a secret that you don't!" site.... and if they accepted his A4V or signature on a bill for the service.

As I wild guess I would say they did not. Which would lead me to believe that "The World Freeman Society", AKA Robert Menard, has a credit or debit card. Do the math :) (OH... No Rob. Don't talk about Trusts because it makes you look even more silly)

ETA:
Any chance of PMing a link? Go on, you know you want to
Click to expand...

I don't have the link. Maybe JB can recall it.
I wouldn't want to see it again. Icky.
 
Last edited:
I cant find it,Drok may have it, it was posted a while ago, I will keep looking, he may have had it removed. (its not in AHH)
 
Bishop said:
Honestly, I'm not anxious for him to return
Click to expand...

That makes two of us.

It's safe to say that the self congratulatory circle-jerk you guys have going verges on being unbearable to the discerning fact seeker already.
 
Last edited:
flabio said:
That makes two of us.

It's safe to say that the self congratulatory circle-jerk you guys have going verges on being unbearable to the discerning fact seeker already.
Click to expand...

Sort of like the back row of freemen wannabes at one of Bobby boy’s “semenards”?
 
flabio said:
That makes two of us.

It's safe to say that the self congratulatory circle-jerk you guys have going verges on being unbearable to the discerning fact seeker already.
Click to expand...
How about you point out something from his teachings that you think needs exploring and we'll do our best for you. Since you're a discerning fact seeker, and all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom