Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

[ComfySlippers]

I just came to post that Menard is perhaps the worst conman in history....

Hopefully he will recognise this fact some time soon.

Whilst gaining a few bucks from gullible dimwits might please him and buy his next big breakfast, beer and pot, he has to realise that to everyone else he is a laughing stock.

The King of ChuckleLand.

ETA:
A quick scan of page 114 gave me a big chuckle.

And no I did not forget my laptop, nor was I pissed or drunk. I was asleep. The guy who stole it though was, and left it behind in another buddies vehicle, and when he found it, it was returned to me. I also had a chat with the thief who owned up to it, and he agreed to do 10 hours of community service with Salvation Army in lieu of other punishment.
So it all worked out very well.

In any event, I have much to do this year, with a new book, movie and Freeman Valley taking shape. Hope you all have a good year!

 

[mushy]

weird, he charges a policeman thousands of dollars and hour to get out of his conveyance, but steal his laptop and he only asks you do 10 hours community service.

 

[Moss]

All hail the Menard, for he is a merciful and compassionate lord.

 

[Bishop]

I'm reminded of the old adage about all liars tripping themselves up eventually or whatever, but I have to agree that even by a con artist's standards, Menard is positively incompetent. He can't even learn from his own mistakes. We've many times pointed out his long history of announcing grand plans that never come to fruition, and yet he continues to make more and more of them.

 

[TjW]

Complaining about Menard making grand plans s a little like complaining about Ed Wood making bad movies. Yes, they're terrible. But it's the only way he knows how, and they do have some value, albeit not in the way the creator intended.

 

[ComfySlippers]

Rob enjoyed watching this pile of nonsense.
(Start at 3:38)

 

[jargon buster]

I think Robs gone for good guys, maybe hes finally woke up himself and realised his delusion.
It certainly has been fun yanking his chain (yes Rob, Ive never denied it ) and exposing him along the way.
He should have stayed within the confines of the freeman forums but his massive ego wouldnt allow it and he had to stray into the land of the rational and sensible and once that happened it was 'curtains' for him.

Maybe he will re-invent himself when he stumbles across someone elses re-hashed ideas and emerge as a 'guru on the land' in a year or so, but for now hes done.

 

[ComfySlippers]

Maybe he will re-invent himself when he stumbles across someone elses re-hashed ideas and emerge as a 'guru on the land' in a year or so, but for now hes done.

But... but... Hmmm... then this may interest you. Check back soon!

Surely he's just busy laying the framework before we try to use the consumer purchase concept.

 

[FreemanMenard]

JB do you not get tired being so wrong so often? What is that like the 20th time you have proclaimed that either I am done, or Freemanery is dead? Every 4-6 weeks you make the same silly claim. And every time you are wrong. And yes CS, I am in fact busy setting up the ACCP.

I notice so many here claim I am a poor conman. Would you point to a life vest and claim it is a crappy anchor? I guess once you have convinced yourself something is true, it becomes next to impossible to accept you are wrong, so you simply claim I am a conman, but not a very good one. The logical alternative is that I was never one to begin with. Not that logic is ever valued much around here eh?

So no JB, I am not done, so very far from it, Freemanery is growing daily, and exponentially, no I am not a conman of any sort, that is why I may appear to be a poor one to those who refuse to believe the truth, and CS, I think you need a life, instead of monitoring and reporting here my youtube viewing.

 

[Horatius]

Rob enjoyed watching this pile of nonsense.
(Start at 3:38)

"You can choose to be a slave..."

Okay, can someone photoshop me a picture of Frederick Douglass, captioned "Frederick Douglass thinks you're an idiot"? That's really the only response we could possibly make to that.

 

[jargon buster]

Hello Rob my little Marionette

Geez you are so predictable, your ego couldnt handle that last post could it?

so you simply claim I am a conman, but and not a very good one.

FTFY

Have you successfully used your method in order to pay for anything yet?

Freemanery is growing daily, and exponentially

 

[Paul]

JB do you not get tired being so wrong so often?

You're just too easy Rob. All we have to do is claim you won't come back and hey presto, there you are like a loyal puppy.

And yes CS, I am in fact busy setting up the ACCP.

How's that going?

I notice so many here claim I am a poor conman.

I would say it is an easily demonstrable fact rather than a claim.

Would you point to a life vest and claim it is a crappy anchor?

Yes. What I would not do is redefine anchor and life vest, claim drowning is conspiracy and explain that all a drowning person needs to do is pay $800 and you will thrown them a special admiralty pattern life jacket.

I guess once you have convinced yourself something is true, it becomes next to impossible to accept you are wrong

So you do have some self awareness after all.

so you simply claim I am a conman, but not a very good one.

Yes, I think that is quite evident.

The logical alternative is that I was never one to begin with.

No it isn't.

Not that logic is ever valued much around here eh?

Perhaps one day you will actually use logic to make a point, I will not hold my breath.

So no JB, I am not done, so very far from it, Freemanery is growing daily, and exponentially

You don't understand any of those concepts do you?

 

[X]

Freemanery is growing daily, and exponentially,

I believe you.
Unfortunately, you're growing exponentially from 1.


You want to impress us, Rob?

Use your "bill-signing" method to pay for something. Successfully, and on camera. No interviews and muddled monologues. No getting someone else to do it for you. No making claims without support. Just go DO IT. And video tape it, and post it here.

Simple, easy, and undeniable proof of your claim.

Unless you are willing to stand by your claim, I see no reason to take you seriously. Especially given how thoroughly and regularly you've been refuted in this thread.

 

[jargon buster]

Use your "bill-signing" method to pay for something. Successfully, and on camera. No interviews and muddled monologues. No getting someone else to do it for you. No making claims without support. Just go DO IT. And video tape it, and post it here.

He cant even scan a letter he says he has that acknowledges hes a freeman on the land.

 

[Border Reiver]

Paul, we are growing exponentially from30,000+.

30,000 alleged freemen/34,755,658 Canadians according to StatsCan at the time of posting. Not a very successful movement is it?

There are almost as many people espousing to be "jedi".

Also, what makes you think I want or need to impress YOU or the other posters here?

That would probably be the fact that you keep coming back to a place that has shown absolutely NO acceptance of your theories, and is in fact quite critical of you and your philosophy.

That is YOUR mindset which you are projecting. YOU have a need to impress, so you assume I do as well. But I do not. I take by your words that you have not actually read the Bills of Exchange Act, and are incapable of even doing so, for then your beliefs would be assaulted, and your ego could not possibly accept that I am correct, and we do have this right. You do not want to use logic and reason to develop any sort of truth, you just demand others serve you 'proof' and maintain your claim that I am a conman. Why not just read the BOE Act and take it from there? Too much for your brain to accept isn't it?

Read it, linked to it and also looked at what you cited as legislation to be read in parallel with it Bank of Canada Act). Writing "consumer purchase" on the bill, invoice, etc. does NOT make it a cheque that can be taken to the Bank of Canada and turned into money for the shopowner. THIS is what the Bank of Canada does. I would also ask you to go to the Bank of Canada (234 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G9 (613) 782-8111)) and see if you can actually do what you say you can. Having educated myself on the matter I know you can't, but you have proposed that you can - prove it.

The idiots are the ones who reject this method of paying without even bothering to read the Act in question or doing any sort of investigation into it. Just blind rejection is all I see here. Read the posts count how many were about me, and how many were about the BOE Act. NOT ONE about the Act, and so many about me and my supposed failings and criminal intent. Do you folks not realize just how ignorant you look?

I read the act, D'rok read the act, Horatius read the acts and we pointed out how they do not say what you think, or want them to say.

After pointing out your errors, we branched out.

Instead of looking at and reading and seeing what is there in the Bills of Exchange Act, you continue to ignore that, and choose instead to attack me. That is what people see. So then they go look up the Act, see it does say what I said it does, and realize this is a forum is populated by mostly fools who pretend to be so intelligent they do not need to read the Act to know it does not say what I said it does.

So who here wants to discuss the BOE Act, and who would rather continue with the illogical ad hominem attacks against me? ( I bet none of you will want to even look at the Act in question, for that requires actual thought, and not merely parroting the beliefs of the herd!)

JB, remember I have commanded you to post here more. If you do so, you accept my power to command you, you admit you are my puppet bitch with a weak ego, and if you do not, it is only because you admit you are wrong, and have been pulling not my chain, but the chains of all the other posters here who follow you blindly and refuse to see how wrong you are and have always been and thus how wrong they are as well.

Post away my little bitches! Even when I was not on this forum, you could not stop posting about me, and doing my will. And you can't stop now either, can you?

Rob, the Freeman on the Land philosophy/legal theory is wrong and has failed each and every time it has been argued in the courts. We've pointed this out and provided the links to the cases to back ourselves up. You don't.

You run from actually providing more than a "wouldn't it be great if..." line, or to trot out a large number of flawed legal arguments. You were unable, or unwilling to accept arayder's offer to put you up in the US where you could actually debate your ideas.

If you didn't care what we said about you, why come back?

 

[Bishop]

So who here wants to discuss...

No. No more discussion. Even if you want to keep claiming that the fault lies with us and not with you, it has been clear for quite some time now that talking about this with you achieves nothing.

This can go no further without you demonstrating this in practice. Do what X said, and show us the proof. That is all you need to do.

 

[Bishop]

And while I'm not a mod and don't want anyone to think that I'm trying to give orders, I strongly recommend that everyone else stop feeding him as well. We've already debunked his claims, many times. There's no need to do it again.

 

[ComfySlippers]

No. No more discussion. Even if you want to keep claiming that the fault lies with us and not with you, it has been clear for quite some time now that talking about this with you achieves nothing.

This can go no further without you demonstrating this in practice. Do what X said, and show us the proof. That is all you need to do.

And just to add, if you do it yourself Rob you won't have to wait for this so called infrastructure to be laid will you?

(Unless you are planning on sending yourself $125 of real money first in order to buy into your own, poorly copied, scam)

 

[jargon buster]

Paul, we are growing exponentially from30,000+.

http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=13099

Welcome back, and sorry for the long delay in updating the site.
We have been busy again running updates on the server and here, updated to the latest phpBB.
Everything went as well as expected and then we also went through some old accounts here, and deleted 4000 users.

A lot of these accounts have been dormant for over a year, and it's cluttering up the database.
In the early days here, spambots and all sorts would register here, and for a while you could get cheap Viagra, Ladies Shoes, and Playstation's, from credible companies in the land of Dipstick.

JB, remember I have commanded you to post here more. If you do so, you accept my power to command you, you admit you are my puppet bitch with a weak ego, and if you do not, it is only because you admit you are wrong, and have been pulling not my chain, but the chains of all the other posters here who follow you blindly and refuse to see how wrong you are and have always been and thus how wrong they are as well.

Well there goes your consent theory Rob, you are now governing me without my consent.

 

[ComfySlippers]

Paul, we are growing exponentially from30,000+.

Look how lively it is in the members forums over at WFS...
(The dates are the latest posts)

Chapter UK News

1. Blog from Blighty and Surrounding Bits
Nov. 22 2010 14:22 UTC

2. ID Cards
June 18 2010 11:45 UTC

3. Nick Clegg: tell us the laws that you want scrapped
June 13 2010 22:32 UTC

4. Welcome Freedom Rebels
May 07 2010 11:23 UTC

5. Unbelievable Britain
Apr. 18 2010 14:50 UTC

6. Robert Green Arrested & Hollie's Army Is Mobilizing!
Apr. 15 2010 16:08 UTC

ETA:
And from the public forum at WFS here is an example of the wonderful members of this 'movement'.

This does not apply to anyone in particular, as it's only an opinion! Might not even be mine.

Lots of members here, same as other web sites seem to view but not post! Who the heck are you people? Why are you members? What is your motive to view? To go back and report! Do you like your job? Do you like being humped? Do you like being an agent? If it was interesting enough to take a look, was it not interesting enough to make a comment?

Here's an example: viewtopic.php?f=119&t=12788 Count the replies, count the views. I haven't read it myself but the amount that have is unbelievable compared to the amount that hasn't replied. One word, Leech, taking but not giving!

Internet warriors eh? Rubbish!


_________________
This post is not advice in any form. All rights are reserved by the poster.

I'm not rising to the bait of the disinformation agent!

Just be aware that pigpot is not rising to the bait of the disinformation agent.

How awesome your followers are Rob.