Robrob
Philosopher
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 5,497
Well, to be fair he's probably "squatting" on it right now.PM me his name and I will contact him.
I have searched high and low for it, it simply doesn't exist, he's a liar.
Well, to be fair he's probably "squatting" on it right now.PM me his name and I will contact him.
I have searched high and low for it, it simply doesn't exist, he's a liar.
PM me his name and I will contact him.
I have searched high and low for it, it simply doesn't exist, he's a liar.
Or, you are simply lying now as well as then?Do you know the name of the trust under which the land was purchased, and if not, how can you claim I am lying?
So tell us how much time did you spend searching
You do realize that it is possible to buy land by way of a blind trust, right?
Do you know the name of the trust under which the land was purchased, and if not, how can you claim I am lying?
Edited by LashL:Removed quote of moderated content.
as someone who lives near the area where menard is said to have land, (60-80 miles away) i can tell you that it is not too hard to believe.
110 acres near dawson creek could have been worth as little as 20-30,000 dollars a few years ago, depending on exactly where it is and the percentage of arable land, which could be low, due to the amount of forest in the area.
south of dawson creek there is not as much development, so the land could have been worth even less.
The hypothetical is believable. Menard is less so.
TBH I don't think he does anymore, none that are prepared to send him any money that is.What amazes me is how Rob Menard can have any followers at all at this point.
You do realize that it is possible to buy land by way of a blind trust, right?
So, Bobby boy, why don’t you close the door on all this and make your doubters look bad by giving the reader the parcel identifier number or civic address for freeman valley?You do realize that it is possible to buy land by way of a blind trust, right?
Do you know the name of the trust under which the land was purchased, and if not, how can you claim I am lying?
Edited by LashL:Removed breaches of Rule 0 and Rule 12.
He can't: it was bought by way of a blind trust, so as a beneficiary of the trust not only does he not know where it is, he doesn't even know that the trust includes land.
Blind Trust.
Hahahaha what makes you think I am the beneficiary and not the administrator?
What amazes me is how Rob Menard can have any followers at all at this point. It would be so easy to send every critic packing and receive international media attention as a sovereign freeman guru by providing 1, single case - about anything and from any common law country in the world - where someone won their case because their status as a "freeman on the land" exempted them from the local law. And the answer can't be that they can't do that because judges never admit when the law doesn't apply to a defendant - they do it all the time: any case dismissed for jurisdiction, sovereign immunity (in the case of diplomats), etc. all contain language stating that the person's status exempts them from that particular law/jurisdiction.
The simplicity of it can be understood by anyone, no law degree required.
I mean, how much easier can it be? Provide that and every one of us is silenced, gone, forever defeated - you'd win, Rob. The BBC and New York Times would be beating down your doorstep and the book publishers would be calling you all day to get you to write your Freeman law guide.
So when you look at it that way - that Rob could "win" and make more money than his birth certificate bond by providing 1 single case, its really not so surprising that he can't provide the address for Freeman valley. By the way: Has there been and comment on what Rob will do when I want to move into freeman valley and pay for everything with Accepted for Value? And why is it that Rob's Freeman Propaganda Shop online sells everything in exchange for trashy, evil federal reserve notes - why can't I A4V items sent to be by Robs store? If you accept government paper in any form you are de facto agreeing to participate in society, Rob.
I too believe you have no followers, Rob.Um, I do not have any followers. And never did.
You won't be living there?
It's going to be kind of tricky to get anyone living there if they don't know where it is.
I too believe you have no followers, Rob.
Perhaps in the past some people did look up to you as some kind of hero figure, but now that you have been exposed for what you are, no one believes anything you say anymore.