Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rob, the last time you talked about 110 acres you said you bought it for yourself.
You are geting mixed up in your own lies now thinking this 110 acres are part of your freeman valley commune.

really you dont know if you are coming or going anymore
So you claim to be the administrator of a blind trust and as such you cannot lawfully be a benificary of that trust.
Accountability
A fiduciary will be liable to account if proven to have acquired a profit, benefit or gain from the relationship by one of three means:[2]

In circumstances of conflict of duty and interest
In circumstances of conflict of duty to one person and duty to another person
By taking advantage of the fiduciary position.
Therefore, it is said the fiduciary has a duty not to be in a situation where personal interests and fiduciary duty conflict, a duty not to be in a situation where his fiduciary duty conflicts with another fiduciary duty, and not to profit from his fiduciary position without express knowledge and consent. A fiduciary cannot have a conflict of interest.
Click to expand...
 
Hundreds of e-mails :D

You certainly had plenty of time on your hands to respond to mine when we had our various exchanges, I myself would have prioritized and responded to people who wanted help and support.
But thats me.
 
Last edited:
FreemanMenard said:
Wow must be tiring speaking for everybody.
Click to expand...
I'm not speaking for everybody, I am merely observing.
In the past there were many internet posters who rushed to your defence when you were challenged, now we only see you being ridiculed wherever you go.

Exposed as a simple and humble man with more questions than answers and a work in progress. Ouch.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Well, no answers actually.

At least i do not fear the light, nor telling people who I am.:D
Click to expand...
The light?
What are you going on about?
Of course you don't mind telling people who you are. The persuit of fame demands it.
Did you wish to tell the hundreds of people who email me weekly what they are to think too?
Click to expand...
No, nor indeed have I expressed a desire to.

Go ahead and try to tear me down, try to attack me where your ego is. It makes me laugh.
Click to expand...
You tear yourself down.
Your lies are continually catching up with you.
 
Last edited:
Stacey Grove said:
I'm not speaking for everybody, I am merely observing.
In the past there were many internet posters who rushed to your defence when you were challenged, now we only see you being ridiculed wherever you go.


Well, no answers actually.


The light?
What are you going on about?
Of course you don't mind telling people who you are. The persuit of fame demands it.

No, nor indeed have I expressed a desire to.


You tear yourself down.
Your lies are continually catching up with you.
Click to expand...

hahaha... stacey, many of those folks gave up not on me, but on you and the forums you infest!
Because you do not see them on this forum or the other one, you think we are not even in contact anymore. The discussions have not ended stacey, they moved. Stick with the times stacey....

I guess maybe you have never heard of facebook.... or skype.... that is where its happening, and you are not involved. Funny how you claim people never come to my defense, yet I chat with them all the time on FB and Skype, and they still love me apparently.

Plus they realize that with the people I deal with on those forum you refer to, no defense is even necessary, as their attacks are laughable.
 
Of course you don't mind telling people who you are. The persuit of fame demands it.
Click to expand...

It also helps when people write "pay Rob Menard the sum of......." when they fill in their cheque books
 
FreemanMenard said:
Hahahaha what makes you think I am the beneficiary and not the administrator?
Click to expand...


I'm not a lawyer, but it seems to me that if as administrator of the trust you had used the trust to buy yourself somewhere to live, it would give rise to a clear conflict of interest.
 
Last edited:
Correct mojo, however he has glossed over it when I mentioned it and Im sure he will ignore it again.

the answer why is blatantly obvious, there is no trust and there is no land. :rolleyes:

We may have to wait a while for a response hes logged in here and Ickes and is in a pickle on both.

He must be running around the web looking for a get out clause on trust law, point is he wouldnt need to if he had been involved in a trust.

You have to admire his tenacity

Edit OOOPS HES BAILED AGAIN
 
Last edited:
Mojo said:
I'm not a lawyer, but it seems to me that if as administrator of the trust you had used the trust to buy yourself somewhere to live, it would give rise to a clear conflict of interest.
Click to expand...

You are right you are not a lawyer. I used the exact same lawful structure that the very rich use to hold their property. And there is no conflict of interest.
 
FreemanMenard said:
This movement is not for those who are so immature they need to be shown proof before they follow a leader.
Click to expand...

So, it's for people who can't/won't see that "the movement" is based on a false premise?

Following what's in their hearts is all well and good, right up til they run afoul of the rest of society's rules, be they traffic laws or taxes and end up a guest of Her Majesty or out of their house.
 
FreemanMenard said:
You are right you are not a lawyer. I used the exact same lawful structure that the very rich use to hold their property.
Click to expand...


Actually, blind trusts are generally used by people in public positions, such as government ministers, to hold their property, so that they cannot be accused of conflicts between their personal interest and decisions they make as ministers. People often use trusts to hold their property but unless someone is in such a public position there is no reason that they shouldn't know what property they hold, and thus no reason to use a blind trust.

And there is no conflict of interest.
Click to expand...


If you are administrator of a trust, and are using that trust for your own benefit (for example by buying somewhere for you to live), then there is a potential conflict between your interest and the interest of the beneficiaries, especially in the case of a blind trust where the beneficiaries have no idea what the trust is invested in and are relying entirely on you to act in their best interest.
 
Last edited:
FreemanMenard said:
Um, I do not have any followers. And never did. But because you think in terms of leaders and followers, being one of the latter yourself, you are blind to the truth.

You also wonder why I do not do something you would do to gain what you feel is important. All you are doing is showing us what is important to YOU. Your assumptions reveal those quite plainly.

This movement is not for those who are so immature they need to be shown proof before they follow a leader. It is for those who are mature enough to look in their own hearts and not follow anyone. But you have always been blind to that fact haven't you?
Click to expand...

FreemanMenard said:
Wow must be tiring speaking for everybody.

Exposed as a simple and humble man with more questions than answers and a work in progress. Ouch.:rolleyes:

At least i do not fear the light, nor telling people who I am.:D

Did you wish to tell the hundreds of people who email me weekly what they are to think too?
Go ahead and try to tear me down, try to attack me where your ego is. It makes me laugh.
Click to expand...

No followers but hundreds of e-mails?
 
This movement is not for those who are so immature they need to be shown proof before they follow a leader. It is for those who are mature enough to look in their own hearts and not follow anyone.
Click to expand...

How does Lance fit into that? The guy was mentally unstable, obviously unfit to recognise he was being conned, he followed your nonsensical pseudo-legal advice and was jailed/put in a mental facility. To add insult to injury you charged him $800 for the privilege!

...and your response to all that?
More silly word games...
"Was it I who jailed him?", "Is he not capable of thinking for himself?", "Can you prove I sold him documents?", "It was a donation".

It is for those who are mature enough to look in their own hearts and not follow anyone.
Click to expand...

...Yeah, gullible dimwits and mentally unstable folk.
 
Last edited:
Hmmmm you have made a point of repeatly pointing out that you; as a freeman, are willing to use your 'real' name in public but now you want to hide the reality of a project YOU told us about?

That contradicts your philsophy doesn't it? It would seem you have something to hide.
 
Yep, made me double-take also.
Anyone who disagrees with Robert Arthur is evil!

ETA: This post now makes no sense due to a deletion :)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom