March 25th, 2011
TO: William J.S. Elliott, Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police,
CC: TWIMC
Hello and good day.
I am Robert-Arthur: Menard a Freeman-on-the-Land and a duly sworn peace officer with the Canadian Common Corps of Peace Officers. Recently I learned that some people claiming to be peace officers, likely RCMP, attended the place of business of an online friend who resides in British Columbia, and asked questions concerning the growing Freeman movement and in particular the location of Robert Arthur Menard.
Since I have been known to lawfully use that name, and I am a vocal advocate for freedom and government accountability, I have made enemies in some law societies, and some people employed by the courts, various governments and police forces may in fact fear the words I lawfully speak to the public and I believe they are abusing their trust in order to silence me and interfere with lawful public discourse and peaceful political actions. I believe they are abusing their authority in order to silence those who question that authority.
I believe they are attempting to silence me by abusing their role in the justice system and attempting to bring charges to bear against me, contrary to Section 465(1) (b) of the Criminal Code of Canada. It states in part:
Conspiracy
465. (1) Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following provisions apply in respect of conspiracy:
(a) every one who conspires with any one to commit murder or to cause another person to be murdered, whether in Canada or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a maximum term of imprisonment for life;
(b) every one who conspires with any one to prosecute a person for an alleged offence, knowing that he did not commit that offence, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable
(i) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years, if the alleged offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to be sentenced to imprisonment for life or for a term not exceeding fourteen years, or
(ii) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, if the alleged offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to imprisonment for less than fourteen years;
(c) every one who conspires with any one to commit an indictable offence not provided for in paragraph (a) or (b) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to the same punishment as that to which an accused who is guilty of that offence would, on conviction, be liable; and
(d) every one who conspires with any one to commit an offence punishable on summary conviction is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
I know the law well enough to know that I do not counsel people to break the law, nor do I provide legal advice. I do not know for certain that there is a prosecution being sought nor if charges are pending, or if an endorsed warrant being enforced, however I do know the RCMP have my email, and if they wished to contact me they could very easily, and sending armed men to find me speaks volumes, and tells me they may wish to seize, abduct and possibly harm me. If there is a warrant for my arrest, there must have been an investigation, and if this was initiated by someone in the government, law society or the courts, and not due to a complaint by a member of the public, it is clearly an effort to silence me for the way I speak of those organizations.
If there are charges pending under the Income Tax Act, then the people who brought the charges and allegations either know or should know that due to the fact that I am not associated with a S.I.N. I have no obligations under that Act, as I do not have an account with the commercial entity known as Canada Revenue Agency nor am I associated with them.
If there are charges for disobeying either the people operating the courts or the government, then they know or should know that those are de facto in nature and Section 15 of the Criminal Code does not criminalize disobeying them, and further that a claim of right has been served on them, and permanent estoppel by acquiescence has been achieved by myself barring them from lawfully bringing charges under statutes or otherwise attempting to govern me without my consent.
Furthermore, I believe they do monitor my Facebook page and are aware that I am arranging for a cross country publicly monitored series of judicial determinations which will quite likely disempower them and possibly open them to criminal liability, and I believe it is for this reason charges are being sought.
Furthermore, I believe they know I have lawful excuse for all my actions by way of being compelled by my faith and by color of right and claim of right, and as one of the more preeminent members of the Freeman movement, seek to make an example of me, for disobeying them, and teaching others how they can lawfully establish lawful excuse to disobey them.
Furthermore, they either know or should know that consent is required for them to attempt to govern another, they know or should know I have revoked that consent, and they have no lawful right to attempt to govern me, nor drag me through a very onerous judicial system to defend myself against fraudulent charges.
Further I believe this conspiracy goes right to the top and that Stephen Harper either likely initiated these actions, or is aware of them and did nothing to stop the conspiracy, likely for fear of the fact that I have spoken of convening proper lawful courts de jure and seeing him and others face charges within said courts.
I firmly believe that a proper and impartial investigation will reveal these charges, if they exist, were initiated by people who would benefit by silencing me, and who would be open to criminal liability if the changes in our political system I foresee occur and that they know the charges are spurious and unwarranted, and they seek them anyway to silence a government critic and freedom advocate who questions their authority and they way in which they exercise that authority.
Therefore I demand a proper investigation be conducted to determine if there is a warrant and if there is who exactly initiated it.
Once that is known, if there is a warrant endorsed which the police seek to enforce, I demand that the effect of this action be examined to determine if there is a possibility that the people who brought the charges and/or initiated the investigation did so due to a complaint by a member of the public, or, was it due to someone in a law society, a court, government agency or police force who did so without an originating incident report number. If so I want them investigated to determine if they conspired with others and if so I want all parties charged and prosecuted.
Until this investigation is complete, any enforcement of any warrant against me is an unlawful act and opens the door to charges of complicity by those enforcing it, as they either now know or should know that the allegations herein have been made.
Furthermore I am a peaceful man, and a sworn peace officer, and no violence or force is necessary or warranted in order to ‘bring me in’. Any violence will be treated as an assault on a peace officer, and if after a proper investigation a warrant, if it exists, is deemed lawfully created, and not due to a conspiracy as herein alleged, will be lawfully dealt with by this Freeman-on-the-Land.
For the purpose of ensuring justice is served, I reserve the right to serve this Notice on members of the public and the media.
Sincerely and without malice aforethought, ill will vexation or frivolity,
I AM
Robert-Arthur: Menard
Freeman-on-the-Land
Chief of the Peace
Canadian Common Corps of Peace Officers.
END
Anyone know his personal email?
) you will not be able to cope with how pompous he is, it's absolutely hilarious, honestly, it's achingly beautiful in it's content of woo (almost every word he speaks is woo),it's sheer patronising delivery is of Olympic standard. The look of smugness he has when he's explaining himself to a female reporter from the local paper is pure class, the fact he is so unaware of how he looks just makes it all the funnier. 
)
: