Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
jargon buster spends his whole life, every waking minute obsessing about menard,
Really?
I spend the occasional hour on the computor throwing him a few broadsides and upsetting his applecart for a while( he will always have new recruits, theres one born every minute :))
Do you really think he means anything to me?
Hes just a loon who wouldnt justify his position in a debate and then got me banned from a website, so for no other reason than that I decided to make his life difficult.
The idiot even made a youtube video about me:D
I know hes not a "full shilling" and I really should leave him alone, but I wont, not until he has the gonads to come here and debate his points.
 
Really?
I spend the occasional hour on the computor throwing him a few broadsides and upsetting his applecart for a while( he will always have new recruits, theres one born every minute :))
Do you really think he means anything to me?
Hes just a loon who wouldnt justify his position in a debate and then got me banned from a website, so for no other reason than that I decided to make his life difficult.
The idiot even made a youtube video about me:D
I know hes not a "full shilling" and I really should leave him alone, but I wont, not until he has the gonads to come here and debate his points.

That attitude strikes me as counterproductive. The best way to deal with Menard is to systematically & politely dismantle his arguments one by one. To involve yourself in an everlasting online feud because you got banned from the David Icke Forum (of all places) may have the effect of reinforcing the FMOTL narrative that there are establishment forces moving against them. It may also persuade those toying with FMOTL ideas to throw their lot in with Menard on the basis he's some kind of martyr.

The point is to show people who are thinking about applying FMOTL theory to their lives that they are making a seriously bad mistake & will end up in much worse position then they're in already.
 
The best way to deal with Menard is to systematically & politely dismantle his arguments one by one.
Been there done that, thats why I was banned :rolleyes:

To involve yourself in an everlasting online feud because you got banned from the David Icke Forum (of all places) may have the effect of reinforcing the FMOTL narrative that there are establishment forces moving against them.
unlikely, but then again the FMOTL stalwarts are blind to rationality so it doesnt matter what anyone does to try and convince them otherwise.

It may also persuade those toying with FMOTL ideas to throw their lot in with Menard on the basis he's some kind of martyr.
Those people would be idiots regardless of seeing his points dismantled rationally or otherwise.

You know what though gtm, maybe I shouldnt bother with him at all, it would appear that the only time he has anything to say is in response to something I post.
I have started more threads on Ickes than Menard and his cronies put together.
Maybe they need me to keep the sub forum going, I will give it a rest for a while and see how busy they are without me.

PS by the way, Im ben10 and hadabusa :D
 
i'm gonna go up there with a dirt bike and tear up the place.
after all, according to rob canada belongs to everybody but ROB only applies to rob.
 
Last edited:
JB, I think now would a good time to come out and admit who girlgye really is.:D
 
Is Menard one of us under deep cover or is he the 'real deal'?

BTW I'm Mark1963 :jaw-dropp
 
Good grief. I see that Menard is continuing his fact-free idiocy on the subject of notaries. He says this:

Menard said:
Now bear in mind providing notarial services is not something either they [The Society of Notaries Public of BC] or the government claim a monopoly over. Just about anyone with the knowledge and wherewithal can hang a shingle and open a notary practice and if they do they can pick and choose who they wish to witness for.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1059648208&postcount=68

Three seconds on the Googles shows that this is completely, utterly false.

1. Notaries in BC are governed exclusively by the Notaries Act - no one may call themselves a Notary unless authorized by this act

2. To become a Notary in BC you must:
- Go through a rigorous application screening process to determine if your education, experience and character are suitable before you even get to start the training process.
- After your application is approved, you must graduate from the Master of Arts in Legal Studies program at Simon Fraser University
- Receive a commission after the "Supreme Court of BC has determined their fitness and they have passed a rigorous set of statutory examinations, conducted by a Board of Examiners named by BC’s Attorney General."

Just to apply to become a Notary, this is the background you need:

1. Graduate of a recognized university.

2. Possesses a sound business or employment background with practical experience.
Preference is shown to applicants with a background in legal drafting, professional
accounting, banking (loans or management), insurance (nominee level), and real estate.

3. A demonstrated above-average ability to communicate, verbally and in writing, in
accordance with accepted business norms. Applicants may be required to successfully
pass an English language proficiency test through TOEFL (Test of English as a Foreign Language).

4. The ability to meet the admission requirements of Simon Fraser University’s Master of Arts in Applied Legal Studies Program.

5. Computer literate and equipped and capable of accessing the Internet

6. Willing and able to set up an independent notarial practice accessible to the public. Should not beinvolved in a business that might be considered a conflict of interest

7. No criminal or bankruptcy record, nor a conviction of moral turpitude

8. Canadian citizen or permanent resident of Canada

9. A history of community service
I wonder how many FOTL numpties would meet those qualifications? (None, of course).

All of this info is easily accessible in a simple brochure:

http://www.notaries.bc.ca/resources/Upload/01-04-2010-16-26-28_Becoming%20a%20Notary%20Brochure-1Apr10_lowres.pdf
 
Last edited:
I wonder if a BC Notary can withhold service from some sorry-ass FOTL?

Avoiding Questionable Conduct
2-P1 A Member should avoid engaging in dishonourable or questionable
conduct, either privately or professionally, that reflects adversely upon
the Member’s professional integrity or competence or that reflects
adversely on the integrity of the notarial profession.
2-P2 Members should take reasonable steps to protect against fraud,
misrepresentation or unethical practices.
2-P3 Members should ensure that they are aware of and comply with all legal
obligations imposed on them, including any provisions of the Proceeds
of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act applicable to
them.

Guidelines
2-G1 Suspicious Documents and Transactions– A Member should not execute
a false or incomplete document, nor be involved with any document or
transaction which the Member knows or suspects is false, deceptive, fraudulent,
or illegal.

http://www.notaries.bc.ca/resources...9_Ethical & Professional Conduct_Sept2010.pdf
Sure looks like it.
 
I wonder if Menard has actualy costed the dividing up and fencing of 110 acres?
If he gets someone to do it for no payment then thats surely plot 2 taken.
Only 9 left (Menard will surely have plot 1 for himself)
 
The poster is not regarded as a troll, so Rob won't go for insults. My money is on him ignoring the post completely, unfortunately.

My money is on a "Hello JB" accusation to alert the mods to ban him.
 
I wonder if Menard has actualy costed the dividing up and fencing of 110 acres?
If he gets someone to do it for no payment then thats surely plot 2 taken.
Only 9 left (Menard will surely have plot 1 for himself)



But, if you put up fences, how will a Freeman exercise his Right to Travel? There shall be no fences in Freeman Valley!


What this implies about walls is left as an exercise for the student.
 
But, if you put up fences, how will a Freeman exercise his Right to Travel? There shall be no fences in Freeman Valley!


What this implies about walls is left as an exercise for the student.

Well, Rob can and that is all that matter to him. Some are more equal than others and all that.

As I mentioned at 795, in fairness to Rob he's quite transparent about the fact that him and his cronies will get preferential treatment.

A few days ago I was optimistic that the silence on the Icke thread meant that the dribblers had finally woken up to Rob's antics. However, some of the usual suspects have started falling into line. They still haven't managed to get those neurons firing after all.

This could turn into a terrific allegory.
 
Plagarist on the land?

Yesterday I make this post on the FMOTL / England thread:-

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6830897&postcount=4857

look what Rob posted soon after:

See ben, they play the man, and not the ball, and they think pissing on me scores them points, when in fact the points are scored when you get someone to think for themselves. And anyone who knows how the game is scored, knows I am blowing them away.

I know it's not a big deal n'stuff but it shows that Rob is monitoring this forum pretty much on a daily basis & doesn't have an original bone in his body :jaw-dropp
 
Yesterday I make this post on the FMOTL / England thread:-

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6830897&postcount=4857

look what Rob posted soon after:

See ben, they play the man, and not the ball, and they think pissing on me scores them points, when in fact the points are scored when you get someone to think for themselves. And anyone who knows how the game is scored, knows I am blowing them away.

I know it's not a big deal n'stuff but it shows that Rob is monitoring this forum pretty much on a daily basis & doesn't have an original bone in his body :jaw-dropp

Very well said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom