Resolved: Trump Era Republicans Are Uniquely Bad in American Political History

[Cabbage]

I've presented this challenge in a couple of other threads; no one chose to take me up on it. I claim what the title says. For starters, I've never seen an American political party that so brazenly lies about such easily checked facts (and without a hint of evidence to support their position) regarding such matters as: Birtherism, Clinton Murder Spree, Climate Change, and Millions of Illegal Voters, to name but a few.

If you disagree, I challenge you to find me a comparable example of such blatant disregard for the Truth.

 

[JoeMorgue]

"Plenty of Presidents have declared war... but never on reality. You got to admit that's kind of new." - Bill Maher.

But yes I agree, for all the good it's going to make to the Trumpers.

In completely neutral terms, the first President elected with zero prior elected or very high military office experience. We kid about Reagan being an actor or Jimmy Carter being a peanut farmer but at least they did stuff in between that and the highest office of a global superpower. Trump went right from getting Stone Cold Stunnered at Wrestlemania and hosting the Apprentice to POTUS.

 

[LSSBB]

Counter examples: (note, I am a Libertarian, so I don't give a **** about which party)

• Cook County democrats
• Boss Tweed machine
• Pro-slavery Democrats pre-civil war
• Know-Nothing Party

 

[JoeMorgue]

Counter examples: (note, I am a Libertarian, so I don't give a **** about which party)

• Cook County democrats
• Boss Tweed machine
• Pro-slavery Democrats pre-civil war
• Know-Nothing Party

I can't help but feel when all your examples either existed or were only relevant (since yes I know the Cook County Democrats technically still exist) before the Moon Landings this is, at best, a "technically correct" counter.

 

[Cavemonster]

I can't help but feel when all your examples either existed or were only relevant (since yes I know the Cook County Democrats technically still exist) before the Moon Landings this is, at best, a "technically correct" counter.

I mean, if we're asking the question about "uniquely bad in American Political History" then surely we're comparing to all of American Political History, not just the last 50 years.

 

[TragicMonkey]

I can't help but feel when all your examples either existed or were only relevant (since yes I know the Cook County Democrats technically still exist) before the Moon Landings this is, at best, a "technically correct" counter.

Did not Solomon send his minister Hephaz unto the Gilabites and Lamtakelites? That's a precedent so none of this is new so let's lay off Trump and let him continue his perfect phone calls.

 

[TragicMonkey]

I mean, if we're asking the question about "uniquely bad in American Political History" then surely we're comparing to all of American Political History, not just the last 50 years.

Yeah, but post WW2 America is radically different from the 75% farmer, semi-literate, fourth-grade educated America of prior centuries.

 

[Cavemonster]

Yeah, but post WW2 America is radically different from the 75% farmer, semi-literate, fourth-grade educated America of prior centuries.

I don't disagree, but OP specifically set the period of comparison as the total of American Political History. Being uniquely bad for the last 50 or 70 years is pretty bad and is a much easier argument to make.

You can't say "I'm the most X in the world!" and then when challeneged that someone in another country is more X than you say "But that country is really different!". The scope of the claim is what it is.

 

[Belz...]

Yeah, but post WW2 America is radically different from the 75% farmer, semi-literate, fourth-grade educated America of prior centuries.

Is it, though?

 

[JoeMorgue]

I mean, if we're asking the question about "uniquely bad in American Political History" then surely we're comparing to all of American Political History, not just the last 50 years.

Again, "technically correct."

 

[LSSBB]

Again, "technically correct."

I'm not seeing "last 50 years" or "moon landings" in the OP.

 

[The Great Zaganza]

There is a major flaw in the idea of grading anyone contemporary by the standards of the last 200 years.

It is perfectly correct to judge the behavior of Republicans by the standards of Today.
Which makes them perfect scum.

 

[LSSBB]

There is a major flaw in the idea of grading anyone contemporary by the standards of the last 200 years.

It is perfectly correct to judge the behavior of Republicans by the standards of Today.
Which makes them perfect scum.

I don't disagree with you. And that's not the OP.

 

[TragicMonkey]

Is it, though?

Yes. We're past the days where a large portion of the poulation had to sign things by making an X. I realize that it's human nature to exaggerate the negative but since this thread does touch upon actual history let's keep some perspective. My FOX News watching, uncritical thinker mom may not be a brilliantly sagacious intellectual but she's light years ahead of eighteenth century dirt farmers who died of old age in their forties convinced the world was flat.

 

[JoeMorgue]

I'm not seeing "last 50 years" or "moon landings" in the OP.

Okay. I've already awarded the "Technically correct" trophy for this thread and we only get one made for each thread. I can certainly get you a "Technically correct" certificate printed up though, if you don't mind buying the frame yourself.

 

[JoeMorgue]

The idea that just because it wasn't literally spelled out that the comparison being made has to take place in roughly similar social/political environments means it wasn't implied is just nitpicking, hairsplitting, stalling nonsense.

 

[varwoche]

There has never been a POTUS who was a rank conspiracy theorist, churning them out on the daily.

There has never been a POTUS who was such a brazen racist/bigot (applying the norms of the times)

There has never been a POTUS who constantly lies about matters big and small, to such an extent that they have declared a war on reality.

There has never been a POTUS who was such a brazen narcissist, to such an extreme that may as well be a surreal comedy.

There has never been a POTUS who buddied up with dictator thugs, predicated on dismissing the facts provided be his own team.

There has never been a POTUS who buddied up with dictator thugs while at the same time alienating long-standing allies.

There has never been a POTUS who encouraged his followers to commit violence against fellow citizens behaving lawfully.

There has never been a POTUS who presents themselves to the world as an infant -- constantly.

There has never been a POTUS so woefully uninformed on the wide array of topics that POTUSes deal wth.

There has never been a POTUS who received the depth and breadth of the blowback from their own party. (Glibly hand-waved away as "never Trumpers")

This is for sure...! Never has one individual embodied so many obnoxious, unhinged, anti-democratic characteristics. Claiming that this freak show is business as usual is flat out delusional.

(Every time I crank out a different version of this list, I leave off a few goodies.)

 

[The Great Zaganza]

there are many ways in which the Trump Presidency is unique in US history.
The way in which Republicans have abdicated their Constitutional obligations of oversight is one of them.

 

[xjx388]

You could make a case that Trump is a uniquely bad President and I won’t even argue with you. The OP is saying that the modern GOP as a whole is uniquely bad in American History and that simply isn’t true.

 

[LSSBB]

Okay. I've already awarded the "Technically correct" trophy for this thread and we only get one made for each thread. I can certainly get you a "Technically correct" certificate printed up though, if you don't mind buying the frame yourself.

Have a glorious day.