This thread has been illuminating.
It seems bizarre to me that these speculations are somehow considered off-limits, or non-skeptical. I haven't seen anyone saying they "believe" or are "convinced" or "know" that the shooter had any given motivations. I have seen people say things like: I "think", I "wonder", I "would be surprised", etc.
I am speculating (gasp) that this was a deeply troubled person acting out against authority in general. It had little to do with red/blue, etc.
It is very reasonable in my mind to explore the possibility that there is a link to the over-the-top violent language being tossed about by the TP crowd. It would be moronic not to make the connection. I just don't think that is the case here.
I fear that if this were a political assassination of the TP persuasion, there would have been a number of differences.
Notably:
1) Far less likely to have shot by standers.
2) We would already have the "goodbye letter" illustrating why the country was going to hell, Obama is a socialist, blah blah blah.
It seems bizarre to me that these speculations are somehow considered off-limits, or non-skeptical. I haven't seen anyone saying they "believe" or are "convinced" or "know" that the shooter had any given motivations. I have seen people say things like: I "think", I "wonder", I "would be surprised", etc.
I am speculating (gasp) that this was a deeply troubled person acting out against authority in general. It had little to do with red/blue, etc.
It is very reasonable in my mind to explore the possibility that there is a link to the over-the-top violent language being tossed about by the TP crowd. It would be moronic not to make the connection. I just don't think that is the case here.
I fear that if this were a political assassination of the TP persuasion, there would have been a number of differences.
Notably:
1) Far less likely to have shot by standers.
2) We would already have the "goodbye letter" illustrating why the country was going to hell, Obama is a socialist, blah blah blah.
