Again, you've changed it from 'which one's Bob?'. 'Oh, he's the tall one'.
Bob is on the left. Bob is talking to Kathy. Bob is by the fax machine. (Is that last on ageist?)
Ways that are going to resonate with someone that's never met Dave?
"Oh, he's the dilligent one"?
Dave is the tax expert who was just telling us about his boring plan to save the company millions of dollars over the next decade.
Dave sits next to Nancy in finance.
Dave, oh you'll know when you've met Dave!
I just don't know how I'd do that consistently. "Who's this person who's signed this email? Which one's he?" is something I can normally only anwer with a physical description. I'd find it weird and difficult to do otherwise.
And yet, here I am saying that you can do something that you have never done before. You can think of me as a crank or you can take it as a fun game. It is a bit weird at first, but I've been doing it so long it is a bit jarring when other don't.
The worst is my mother. She can't tell a story about anyone without commenting on their heritage. In fact, if their heritage is complex she never even gets to the story.
Again, I'm not talking about defining someone, I'm not talking about it becoming their moniker, just the whole 'which one's x' thing.
Yep, I know. And I'm not talking about what you say to your friends or at the bar or in your family. I'm just talking about a professional setting. It seems unprofessional to me to refer to another professional by their physical characteristics in a professional setting.
As I say, what people look like is how we know who they are. Hell, you've probably worked with a Mr Little, or a Miss Short. Names derived direclty from the physical appearance of whoever their ancestor was when surnames became required.
The funny thing is that how people look has little to do with who they are and how we know who they are. Especially in a professional setting.
I worked with a guy who had a somewhat common name. I was at a function and someone asked me if I knew someone of that name and I answered that I did and he was very good at topic X. The person agreed that they were expert at topic X and then clarified that the guy they were talking about was morbidly obese. Oh, no, the guy I work with is a huge health nut. Different guy.
Later I found out we were talking about the same person. He was once morbidly obese and he was now a health nut. If we had stayed away form the physical description we would have known we were talking about the same person, because his field of expertise was pretty niche. But, because we relied too much on the physical description we ended up wrong.