Questions Truthers can't answer

johnny karate said:
I must have missed that (along with the rest of the world). Can you please provide a link to something that supports your claim?
Click to expand...

In 2004, the following books were published:

The 9/11 Commission Report

The 9/11 Commission, Omissions & Distortions by Griffin

The Terror Timeline by Paul Thompson

Crossing the Rubicon by Michael Rupert

All the public evidence needed to prove 9/11 was an inside job was available and organized by the end of 2004.
 
Galileo said:
Since the WTC was severely damaged by airplanes, fire, and debris (WTC 1 hit by debris from WTC 2), fewer explosives were needed than if no plane impacts had occurred.
Click to expand...

The evil doers had know way of knowing if the planes would ever reach their target or for that matter how much damage the plane crashes would do (what if one or both of the planes just clipped the buildings?).

What's the math formula here?
 
Galileo said:
I'm agreeing with you on this, that's called a stipulation in law. We both agree the planes would have set off explosives.



You asked what I think happened on 9/11 and I told you.

Do you have any evidence that I don't think this? I will argue that the fact that I said it is evidence that I think it.
Click to expand...



Your mathematically-impossible conspiracy undertook a hopelessly convoluted operation in order to transfer control of both houses of Congress from the Republicans to the Democrats. How did a Republican President and Vice-President fail to notice that all of this was happening?

Who exactly signed off on the plan to deliver a trillion-dollar hit to the U.S. economy? Why were the airlines so willing to be complicit in a plan that nearly bankrupted them?

Have you ever wondered why police look for a MOTIVE when a crime has been committed? I know, but why not?

All of the thousands of physicists, structural engineers, seismologists, metallurgists, forensic examiners, fire safety specialists, demolition experts, air traffic controllers, avionics techs, pilots, military personnel, police and firefighters who necessarily know da twoof about the most far-reachimng conspiracy in history have--in complete defiance of statistical principles--remained silent for years. What constitutes the coercive muscle to keep all of these people in line? This shadow army must suppress any FBI or CIA agents who know da twoof as well. Who the hell are the these people and how do they do what they do?
 
Galileo said:
In 2004, the following books were published:

The 9/11 Commission Report

The 9/11 Commission, Omissions & Distortions by Griffin

The Terror Timeline by Paul Thompson

Crossing the Rubicon by Michael Rupert

All the public evidence needed to prove 9/11 was an inside job was available and organized by the end of 2004.
Click to expand...
Then why is your impotent movement unable to convince the majority of people in the USA nor are they able to win anything in court. Their record now stands anywhere between 0-7 and 0-407. Now are you gonna answer post #57 because if not I suggest you put me on ignore cause I promise I will just keep asking.
 
Galileo said:
In 2004, the following books were published:

The 9/11 Commission Report

The 9/11 Commission, Omissions & Distortions by Griffin

The Terror Timeline by Paul Thompson

Crossing the Rubicon by Michael Rupert

All the public evidence needed to prove 9/11 was an inside job was available and organized by the end of 2004.
Click to expand...



You were correct in refusing to try to read any of the latter three as they are all worthless rubbish. Your inability to read anything published by serious researchers is unfortunate, but it is too late to remedy the problem.
 
Last edited:
tj15 said:
Didn't demolition expert, Brent Blanchard, say that the explosives would not be set off by the impacts of the airplanes, but rather that they (the explosives) would be destroyed by the impacts? The explosives would have also had to survive the fires in the impact zones. Doesn't fire destroy explosives?
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter if some of the explosives where the planes hit were destoyed or went off early. If they go off, that destroys them anyway.

Brent Blanchard is not an demolitions expert.
 
pomeroo said:
All of the thousands of physicists, structural engineers, seismologists, metallurgists, forensic examiners, fire safety specialists, demolition experts, air traffic controllers, avionics techs, pilots, military personnel, police and firefighters who necessarily know da twoof about the most far-reachimng conspiracy in history have--in complete defiance of statistical principles--remained silent for years. What constitutes the coercive muscle to keep all of these people in line? This shadow army must suppress any FBI or CIA agents who know da twoof as well. Who the hell are the these people and how do they do what they do?
Click to expand...

yet all of these people, in on the conspiracy, and they couldn't manage to plant CORRECT FDR data for the flight 77 crash, and couldn't manage to FABRICATE DNA SAMPLES OR RESULTS TO CONFIRM THE IDENTITIES OF THE FAKE HIJACKERS.

A very large pile of ultimately dumb people I guess.

TAM:rolleyes:
 
~enigma~ said:
Care to go through that list one by one and show how each is indicitave of an inside job and if you succeed in that then explain how each answer could only be the US government or an agency of....go ahead, this will be extremely interesting.
Click to expand...

I don't feel like it right now.
 
~enigma~ said:
Then why is your impotent movement unable to convince the majority of people in the USA nor are they able to win anything in court. Their record now stands anywhere between 0-7 and 0-407. Now are you gonna answer post #57 because if not I suggest you put me on ignore cause I promise I will just keep asking.
Click to expand...


Question for you...As Tucker Carlson WOULDNT show 7 when interviewing Griffin, and said he would before the interview...let me ask you this


If CNN showed WTC 7 coming down in primetime, and had Griffin pointing out his thoughts on it as it ran, and then conducted a poll of its viewers asking them if it looked like fire brought it down or if it was a CD, WHAT WOULD THE POLL RESULTS BE??


Frankly, MOST people i have brought up 7 to, have never heard of it or are unaware of its demise or both.


Heck, lots of people think Obama is Muslim, and he is all over the news.
 
Galileo said:
Appoint honest people to head the CIA, FBI, and U.S. military, then order the heads of these departments to produce the documents that prove 9/11 was an inside job.
Click to expand...


Why should sane people assume that your neo-Nazi lynch mob would prove to be honest?

Why has your evil movement failed to produce a single shred of actual evidence in six years of deranged shrieking?

Wouldn't it be terrific if those damned jihadists would stop bragging about their victory?
 
roundhead said:
Question for you...As Tucker Carlson WOULDNT show 7 when interviewing Griffin, and said he would before the interview...let me ask you this


If CNN showed WTC 7 coming down in primetime, and had Griffin pointing out his thoughts on it as it ran, and then conducted a poll of its viewers asking them if it looked like fire brought it down or if it was a CD, WHAT WOULD THE POLL RESULTS BE??


Frankly, MOST people i have brought up 7 to, have never heard of it or are unaware of its demise or both.


Heck, lots of people think Obama is Muslim, and he is all over the news.
Click to expand...


A poll of demolition experts would show a unanimous rejection of the fantasy movement's baseless myths. What do you conspiracy liars know that professionals in their respective fields do not?
 
roundhead said:
If CNN showed WTC 7 coming down in primetime, and had Griffin pointing out his thoughts on it as it ran, and then conducted a poll of its viewers asking them if it looked like fire brought it down or if it was a CD, WHAT WOULD THE POLL RESULTS BE??
Click to expand...

The poll results would probably be that WTC7 was taken down by controlled demolition. This in no way makes it true though, and is a weak appeal to popularity.
 
Galileo said:
Aha! But the answers were incorrect. I will give them an E for Effort.
Click to expand...



You spelled "inconvenient" incorrectly. Yes, the answers are extremely inconvenient to your evil movement, but your side has lost. The good guys won. Isn't it time you considered getting a life?
 
RKOwens4 said:
6.) When looking for evidence that the government is willing to kill Americans, why do you keep referring to Operation Northwoods, which did not involve the killing of Americans and was rejected by the government?
Click to expand...

You are guilty of conspiracy if you commit an overt act to further the conspiracy. Writing the conspiracy plan down on paper and giving it to the president is an overt act.
 
Galileo said:
It doesn't matter if some of the explosives where the planes hit were destoyed or went off early. If they go off, that destroys them anyway.

Brent Blanchard is not an demolitions expert.
Click to expand...


An agenda-driven ignoramus doesn't think he is, but the demolition industry disagrees. As usual, the conspiracy liar is wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom