RKOwens4
Thinker
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2007
- Messages
- 212
1.) How would a controlled demolition (or even thermite/thermate use) account for pools of molten steel remaining molten for weeks and weeks in the first place?
2.) The FDNY says the collapse of WTC7 was fully expected and unpreventable. Based on looking at internet videos, you say there was no reason for WTC7 to collapse. Are you smarter than the FDNY?
3.) Why would Larry Silverstein admit to demolishing WTC7, if that's what he really meant?
4.) Why didn't any cameras pick up the sounds of explosions prior to the collapse of any of the buildings or even during it?
5.) Why do you try to substitute for this glaring inconsistency by saying that some people heard explosions long before and even after the collapses, which is entirely consistent with transformers and vehicles and the like exploding randomly but entirely inconsistent with a specially timed sequence of controlled demolition explosions?
6.) When looking for evidence that the government is willing to kill Americans, why do you keep referring to Operation Northwoods, which did not involve the killing of Americans and was rejected by the government?
7.) How does Flight 93 tie into the 9/11 conspiracy in any way, shape, or form? The leading truther theory seems to be that it was shot down. But this would mean that the plane was indeed under the control of hijackers and not under the control of the government, otherwise why shoot down one of their own four planes which they had put up in the first place. If you believe the reality that the storming of the cockpit caused the hijackers to ground the plane, then this means the plane was hijacked. Finally, the third option is by far the silliest: Flight 93 landed in Cleveland. For what reason? What would the government gain by... uh, landing a passenger plane at an airport?
2.) The FDNY says the collapse of WTC7 was fully expected and unpreventable. Based on looking at internet videos, you say there was no reason for WTC7 to collapse. Are you smarter than the FDNY?
3.) Why would Larry Silverstein admit to demolishing WTC7, if that's what he really meant?
4.) Why didn't any cameras pick up the sounds of explosions prior to the collapse of any of the buildings or even during it?
5.) Why do you try to substitute for this glaring inconsistency by saying that some people heard explosions long before and even after the collapses, which is entirely consistent with transformers and vehicles and the like exploding randomly but entirely inconsistent with a specially timed sequence of controlled demolition explosions?
6.) When looking for evidence that the government is willing to kill Americans, why do you keep referring to Operation Northwoods, which did not involve the killing of Americans and was rejected by the government?
7.) How does Flight 93 tie into the 9/11 conspiracy in any way, shape, or form? The leading truther theory seems to be that it was shot down. But this would mean that the plane was indeed under the control of hijackers and not under the control of the government, otherwise why shoot down one of their own four planes which they had put up in the first place. If you believe the reality that the storming of the cockpit caused the hijackers to ground the plane, then this means the plane was hijacked. Finally, the third option is by far the silliest: Flight 93 landed in Cleveland. For what reason? What would the government gain by... uh, landing a passenger plane at an airport?
, or those of his time.