Questions Truthers can't answer

If by "Truth" you mean "Trash spewed by fantasists" then yes we do have a few posters such as yourself here.

That's not what I mean, either.

The JREF forum is the only site with decent debunkers who actually have some intelligence and detailed knowledge of 9/11. To find the truth, you must study both side of the argument. If it weren't for the JREF forum, it would be almost impossible to know the truth.
 
Oh, I know what you were incorrectly implying. I was just helping to show that your statement wasn't completely false.

But since we're in the "Questions Truthers can't answer" thread... here's mine (I apologize if has come up already). Feel free to answer it Galileo.

Is KSM guilty of the murder of 3,000+ U.S. Citizens?

No. But he did admit to killing the Pope and Jimmy Carter.
 
That's not what I mean, either.

The JREF forum is the only site with decent debunkers who actually have some intelligence and detailed knowledge of 9/11. To find the truth, you must study both side of the argument. If it weren't for the JREF forum, it would be almost impossible to know the truth.

So you are saying that it is a good thing that debunkers exist, because without them people might actually believe the stuff that the "Truth" Movement is saying? Well said.
 
So you are saying that it is a good thing that debunkers exist, because without them people might actually believe the stuff that the "Truth" Movement is saying? Well said.

Agreed. The JREF forums help boil down lots of 9/11 material into the stuff that is really true.
 
No. But he did admit to killing the Pope and Jimmy Carter.

So, have you done anything to free this innocent man? Here is the Truth Movement's chance to save an innocent life and bring the "truth" about 9/11 to the national media.

What is being done to save this innocent man's life?
 
No, the FBI is an investigative body. Scotland Yard is an investigative body. These, and organizations like them, are institutions that existed long before the events of 9/11 for the sole purpose of investigating.

You rattled off the names of websites that are merely a collection of impotent kooks who share your unsubstantiated delusions. These organizations are hardly investigative bodies. They're hardly even organizations. Next you'll be claiming Prison Planet is a MSM outlet.

Please try again:

Why has not a single law enforcement agency, investigative body, or MSM outlet on the planet discerned and/or revealed The Truth behind the events of 9/11?

Bump for Galileo.
 
The Pilots for 9/11 Truth don't think that FL77 flew over the Pentagon. Som of teir members so as individuals, but not the organiztion itself.

Since you asked, here's my frank opinion of these 4 groups:

Pilots >>> good at raising awareness of 9/11 Truth among pilots.

Scholars (Fetzer) >>> a disaster waiting to happen

Scholars Truth & Justice >>> solid work, but poor PR

AE911truth.org >>> Gage is a one-man wrecking crew

The only site that knows the truth is www.911research.com

I must say you are quite the eccentric fellow.

Anyhoo, do you have an answer to #215?
 
Blanchard is not a controlled demolition expert, he only works there. He has no license or training in the area of contolled demolition. Basically, he's the manager of people who do contolled demolitions.


This is incorrect.
 
This is incorrect.

Here's something that is correct:

Blanchard is not a demolitions expert. He helps prove it by his pathetic piece of archie debunking trash. No wonder Jim Hoffman eats him alive.
 
No, the FBI is an investigative body. Scotland Yard is an investigative body. These, and organizations like them, are institutions that existed long before the events of 9/11 for the sole purpose of investigating.

You rattled off the names of websites that are merely a collection of impotent kooks who share your unsubstantiated delusions. These organizations are hardly investigative bodies. They're hardly even organizations. Next you'll be claiming Prison Planet is a MSM outlet.

Please try again:

Why has not a single law enforcement agency, investigative body, or MSM outlet on the planet discerned and/or revealed the Truth behind the events of 9/11?

Bump #2 for Galileo.
 
Here's something that is correct:

Blanchard is not a demolitions expert. He helps prove it by his pathetic piece of archie debunking trash. No wonder Jim Hoffman eats him alive.


You've been caught lying again.
 
Show me a peer reviewed paper written by Blanchard.



I can show you the paper he wrote refuting the dishonest claims of conspiracy liars. None of you frauds have found anything wrong with it, least of all the inept software engineer Jim Hoffman..
 
I can show you the paper he wrote refuting the dishonest claims of conspiracy liars. None of you frauds have found anything wrong with it, least of all the inept software engineer Jim Hoffman..

Hoffman's paper is far superior than that of Blanchard's and you know it.
 
argument from authority = invalid.

Nope, that's a valid form of argument from authority, because the people do have authority in the matter.

The argument from authority fallacy is when you put trust in someone's authority but that person doesn't have authority in the appropriate field.

Like truthers who think Griffin is right about the collapse, but he's not a structural engineer, he's a theologian.
 
Last edited:
Here's something that is correct:

Blanchard is not a demolitions expert. He helps prove it by his pathetic piece of archie debunking trash. No wonder Jim Hoffman eats him alive.

Incidentally, I refuted Hoffman line for line in the thread about seismic signatures. Curiously, you have not responded.

Hoffman is full of it.
 

Back
Top Bottom