This is somewhat of a continuation or just more in depth reply to some of the posts in this thread. Might as well start with the warning.
Pyrrho – (Circa 360 – 270 before con) Greek philosopher, founder of Skepticism. He thought it impossible to arrive at any certain knowledge and held that the wise man should not judge but should aim at a balanced imperturbability.
So he wasn’t certain of his own philosophy?
So by this definition, 1+1=2 is not a certainty. H2O is not the certain chemical or elemental composition of pure water? By this definition then he would think magic exists. This would be along the lines of what I would mean if I used the term “airhead”. And philosophy is not science, it is more religion. Again going by the definition. You warn me of foul language, yet you allow others to jump to conclusions and judge me delusional. You should change your pseudonym. People in real life that dress like your avatar don’t scare me. Just in case you don’t know what imperturbability means, it means not susceptible to alarm or agitation. (Or is that to much of a certainty?) If being tortured doesn’t bother you then it is not torture. Sounds more like he was the founder of the politically correct stuff like ‘as long as it makes you fell good about yourself, then it is alright no matter who else it hurts’. After all they shouldn’t get agitated so it wouldn’t be torture or harassment. Maybe he wanted to start his own little politically correct cult. People that think like the above statement should remember that it applies to them also.
A little more on the rules for posting here and psychology in general. Isn’t it funny (not really) how when someone repeatedly goads or harasses someone else, even after being asked to stop by that person, and then gets their rear end kicked, it is somehow the person doing the rear end kicking that supposedly has the problem? More PC crud. Also usage of the phrase “place where fecal matter is excreted from” kind of changes the fact that the word it replaces means something else. This would also apply to something like “copulation” you (which is not aimed at anyone just an example). Stating it this way implies doing something completely different than if the word it replaced was used.
Another thing I see in some posts is the term illuminati. Do you even know what it means or where it originated? The dictionary I have defines it as; persons claiming to have supernatural knowledge. There is no such thing as the supernatural. Also if you think you have supernatural knowledge, then who is it that is delusional? There is an article in a back issue of the U.S. Skeptic magazine, I believe it was from 1996, by Tim Callahan that shows the illuminati were cult members that broke off from the mainstream cults and formed their own little cults or secret societies, which all still fall into the religion is an atrocity category. No not everything in the article is correct, but he does seem to know the origins of the atrocities known as religions pretty well.
As for saying contact electrodes wouldn’t be considered mind control, you might want to check into some of the atrocities (usually called experiments) that have taken place at mental institutions. Both here and abroad. But to do that you will have to leave the ‘safety’ of this site and the others associated with the ‘people’ here. Said atrocities have included the use of electrodes in something known as electro-convulsive therapy and in what is now term electro-shock therapy along with brain-washing programs. Anyway, along these lines I will try to make a comparison that even you can comprehend. First though, a comparison is just that and it does not imply that I am suggesting what is used to make the comparison is what is being used in the psychotronic attacks. Do you understand how a regular wall phone works? It uses electrical signals. Yet anything that can be done with it using said electrical signals can be done with a cell phone which uses electromagnetic waves (radiation) for it’s signals. In fact even more can be done with the cell phone.
Some more on the comments about the article and it’s authors. I wonder what kind of delusions the people developing the atomic bomb had? After all they named the project Trinity. Unfortunately, the bombs did work. So by your ‘reasoning’ here, the fact that most torture devices were created by or for religions would mean that they didn’t work.
Now for the childish thread comments. Who started the name calling? It wasn’t me. You people started calling me a paranoid schizophrenic, then you try to turn it around and say I am childish for fighting back. What is your web site address? Or are you afraid of getting debunked? So I guess if a group of people or various groups of people or even various people within groups decided to gang up on you it would be more believable because you are sooooo important?
By the way, I don’t know if I was clear on this point but the torture by the psychotronic weaponry has not stopped. It continues even as I write this.
Anyway, I am not new at this and have dealt with the misdiagnosis and name calling stuff before. Even had the religious people that claim to be under attack (which I will give the benefit of the doubt to, until proven otherwise) call me one of the attackers or ‘perps’ as they call them. This for pointing out facts about their religion being an atrocity and the fact that their religion leads to a lot of false beliefs or claims that they attribute to weaponry or the ‘perps’. A couple of them also complained about the length of a few of my e-mails. It was an e-mail group. One of them even went so far as to say that she and whatever group she belongs to would try to discredit me. I have no intention of making that an easy thing to do for anyone. I sent that entire exchange in an attachment to the administrator of this forum, about five to ten minutes before posting this, for verification purposes and because of the aforementioned warning about foul language.
Now for the person posting the electromagnetic wave comment. First of all, electromagnetic waves (radiation) are not made of particles. Here are a few definitions for you that were posted elsewhere.
Phase space; an 'ideal' often multi-dimensional space of which the coordinate dimensions represent the variables required to specify the phase or state of a system or substance. (In other words make up what you need as you need it to prove a theory. Yes I realize the difference between multi-dimensional and extra-dimensional.)
Coordinate space; space in the usual sense of 3 dimensional geometry as distinguished from various symbolic phase spaces. (In other words, REALITY)
Symbolic; 1.of or relating to a symbol, 2.a) using, employing or exhibiting a symbol or expressed in symbols, b) consisting of a symbol, 3. of or relating to a lodge of freemasonry, 4.a) proceeding by means of symbols: SUBSTITUTING ABSTRACT REPRESENTATIONS FOR CONCRETE OBJECTS, b) characterized by or terminating in symbols instead of the things symbolized. (There were other definitions also. Personally I would rather stick with the concrete objects and the words or numbers represented.)
Complex number; a number or expression comprising both real and imaginary parts, of general form a+ib when a and b are both real numbers and i = the square root of negative one.
Momentum; a measure of the quantity of motion, defined as the product of the mass and the velocity of a body, and determining the length of time during which constant force must act on a moving body to bring it to rest. Momentum is a vector quantity parallel to the velocity vector. // (loosely) the force built up by a moving body.
So using the quantity of the mass of a photon (which doesn’t exist, I just wrote to make a point) and multiplying by the number of photons in a specific beam and then multiplying said quantity by the velocity of the beam one would get the momentum of said beam.
Mass; the property of a body that is a measure of its inertia and that is commonly taken as a measure of the amount of material it contains and causes it to have weight in a gravitational field.
So then a photon would need to have weight in a gravitational field to have mass and then a beam of light would also have weight. (These comments added for this post. By the way gravity does not bend light. Light does not have momentum. NASA’s light sail is a joke. Actually it is a cover-up to get a massive electromagnetic weapon system in space bypassing current restrictions against such things.)
Some other common sense facts about particles. To say a particle has no mass is in itself a contradiction. To be a particle, it would have to have boundaries. Said boundaries would have to have mass or all of the particles would blend together into one. Which means that they wouldn’t be particles. All electromagnetic radiation is in a waveform. Said electromagnetic radiation can generate enough heat to cause a disturbance in the atoms surrounding the wave. Said electromagnetic radiation can also sever molecules. Said electromagnetic radiation, when in the light spectrum, can also illuminate atoms or parts of atoms which when coupled with the heat effect may cause the appearance of a particle traveling in the wave. Radiation is a product of particle interaction. Particles are not a product of radiation interaction. Energy and mass are not interchangeable. Energy does not turn into mass and mass does not turn into energy. Before anyone replies, read how fusion and fission work. If something has no mass then it will not gain mass, regardless of what is done to it and if something has mass it will have mass regardless of how small of pieces it is broken into. Something else to consider, if electromagnetic radiation consisted of, or contained, particles then it would not be useable for broadcasting purposes. That means radio, television, cell phones, etc. I just got through explaining this to someone in a different discussion group.
Oh by the way, I was taking algebra (on my own time, in the classroom, with a book from my teacher) and the French language (on computers from the state because of the high scholastic achievement test scores of myself and four others) in the fourth grade. School just got real boring. According to the MENSA sponsored I.Q. test (I.Q. is a measure of how fast you are capable of learning not how much you know) on FOX, I scored a whopping 3 points lower than the highest scoring scientist in their studio. He scored 138, I scored 135. The test only allowed for a score of around 145. That said I think I shall turn my efforts back to the mind control weaponry and other abuses. However as always I will continue to keep an eye and ear open for other bull going on.
For those that would say that the psychotronic weaponry helps in learning, I also scored a 143 on my ASVAB test in February of 1982 when I was still 16 years old. The 143 translated into a 98 percentile. And personally even with the attacks, I thought the Fox show was a joke.
No, I am not stupid. However I would consider being called an intellectual an insult. I am also an atheist, which means that I do not believe in any sort of magic or supernatural powers. It also means that I follow no system of religious worship, nor do I believe in any gods, devils, universal beings, angels, demons, heavens, hells or a soul.
