psychotronic weaponry

[SteveGrenard]

Yahweh wote: There are no such things as "mind control" devices (Note: Things such as electrodes which stimulate neural tissue probably wouldnt be defined as "mind control", and certainly wouldnt be "psychotronic weaponry").

Alright, now dont think about such things and have a good day.

The mind has no firewall……..
The following article which you must have missed appeared in Parameters, a publication of the U.S. Army War College. The URL is :
http://carlisle-www.army.mil/USAWC/...ring/thomas.htm
This is a U.S. government website. Permission to reprint articles from Parameters is specifically permitted for non-commercial purposes and with proper attribution as given above and below.

The Mind Has No Firewall
TIMOTHY L. THOMAS

From Parameters, Spring 1998, pp. 84-92.

"It is completely clear that the state which is first to create such weapons will achieve incomparable superiority." -- Major I. Chernishev, Russian army[1]

The human body, much like a computer, contains myriad data processors. They include, but are not limited to, the chemical-electrical activity of the brain, heart, and peripheral nervous system, the signals sent from the cortex region of the brain to other parts of our body, the tiny hair cells in the inner ear that process auditory signals, and the light-sensitive retina and cornea of the eye that process visual activity.[2] We are on the threshold of an era in which these data processors of the human body may be manipulated or debilitated. Examples of unplanned attacks on the body's data-processing capability are well-documented. Strobe lights have been known to cause epileptic seizures. Not long ago in Japan, children watching television cartoons were subjected to pulsating lights that caused seizures in some and made others very sick.

Defending friendly and targeting adversary data-processing capabilities of the body appears to be an area of weakness in the US approach to information warfare theory, a theory oriented heavily toward systems data-processing and designed to attain information dominance on the battlefield. Or so it would appear from information in the open, unclassified press. This US shortcoming may be a serious one, since the capabilities to alter the data- processing systems of the body already exist. A recent edition of U.S. News and World Report highlighted several of these "wonder weapons" (acoustics, microwaves, lasers) and noted that scientists are "searching the electromagnetic and sonic spectrums for wavelengths that can affect human behavior."[3] A recent Russian military article offered a slightly different slant to the problem, declaring that "humanity stands on the brink of a psychotronic war" with the mind and body as the focus. That article discussed Russian and international attempts to control the psycho-physical condition of man and his decisionmaking processes by the use of VHF-generators, "noiseless cassettes," and other technologies.
An entirely new arsenal of weapons, based on devices designed to introduce subliminal messages or to alter the body's psychological and data-processing capabilities, might be used to incapacitate individuals. These weapons aim to control or alter the psyche, or to attack the various sensory and data-processing systems of the human organism. In both cases, the goal is to confuse or destroy the signals that normally keep the body in equilibrium.

This article examines energy-based weapons, psychotronic weapons, and other developments designed to alter the ability of the human body to process stimuli. One consequence of this assessment is that the way we commonly use the term "information warfare" falls short when the individual soldier, not his equipment, becomes the target of attack.
Information Warfare Theory and the Data-Processing Element of Humans

In the United States the common conception of information warfare focuses primarily on the capabilities of hardware systems such as computers, satellites, and military equipment which process data in its various forms. According to Department of Defense Directive S-3600.1 of 9 December 1996, information warfare is defined as "an information operation conducted during time of crisis or conflict to achieve or promote specific objectives over a specific adversary or adversaries." An information operation is defined in the same directive as "actions taken to affect adversary information and information systems while defending one's own information and information systems." These "information systems" lie at the heart of the modernization effort of the US armed forces and other countries, and manifest themselves as hardware, software, communications capabilities, and highly trained individuals. Recently, the US Army conducted a mock battle that tested these systems under simulated combat conditions.

US Army Field Manual 101-5-1, Operational Terms and Graphics (released 30 September 1997), defines information warfare as "actions taken to achieve information superiority by affecting a hostile's information, information based-processes, and information systems, while defending one's own information, information processes, and information systems." The same manual defines information operations as a "continuous military operation within the military information environment that enables, enhances, and protects friendly forces' ability to collect, process, and act on information to achieve an advantage across the full range of military operations. [Information operations include] interacting with the Global Information Environment . . . and exploiting or denying an adversary's information and decision capabilities."[4]

This "systems" approach to the study of information warfare emphasizes the use of data, referred to as information, to penetrate an adversary's physical defenses that protect data (information) in order to obtain operational or strategic advantage. It has tended to ignore the role of the human body as an information- or data-processor in this quest for dominance except in those cases where an individual's logic or rational thought may be upset via disinformation or deception. As a consequence little attention is directed toward protecting the mind and body with a firewall as we have done with hardware systems. Nor have any techniques for doing so been prescribed. Yet the body is capable not only of being deceived, manipulated, or misinformed but also shut down or destroyed--just as any other data-processing system. The "data" the body receives from external sources--such as electromagnetic, vortex, or acoustic energy waves--or creates through its own electrical or chemical stimuli can be manipulated or changed just as the data (information) in any hardware system can be altered.
The only body-related information warfare element considered by the United States is psychological operations (PSYOP). In Joint Publication 3-13.1, for example, PSYOP is listed as one of the elements of command and control warfare. The publication notes that "the ultimate target of [information warfare] is the information dependent process, whether human or automated . . . . Command and control warfare (C2W) is an application of information warfare in military operations. . . . C2W is the integrated use of PSYOP, military deception, operations security, electronic warfare and physical destruction."[5]
One source defines information as a "nonaccidental signal used as an input to a computer or communications system."[6] The human body is a complex communication system constantly receiving nonaccidental and accidental signal inputs, both external and internal. If the ultimate target of information warfare is the information-dependent process, "whether human or automated," then the definition in the joint publication implies that human data-processing of internal and external signals can clearly be considered an aspect of information warfare. Foreign researchers have noted the link between humans as data processors and the conduct of information warfare. While some study only the PSYOP link, others go beyond it. As an example of the former, one recent Russian article described offensive information warfare as designed to "use the Internet channels for the purpose of organizing PSYOP as well as for `early political warning' of threats to American interests."[7] The author's assertion was based on the fact that "all mass media are used for PSYOP . . . [and] today this must include the Internet." The author asserted that the Pentagon wanted to use the Internet to "reinforce psychological influences" during special operations conducted outside of US borders to enlist sympathizers, who would accomplish many of the tasks previously entrusted to special units of the US armed forces.

Others, however, look beyond simple PSYOP ties to consider other aspects of the body's data-processing capability. One of the principal open source researchers on the relationship of information warfare to the body's data-processing capability is Russian Dr. Victor Solntsev of the Baumann Technical Institute in Moscow. Solntsev is a young, well-intentioned researcher striving to point out to the world the potential dangers of the computer operator interface. Supported by a network of institutes and academies, Solntsev has produced some interesting concepts.[8] He insists that man must be viewed as an open system instead of simply as an organism or closed system. As an open system, man communicates with his environment through information flows and communications media. One's physical environment, whether through electromagnetic, gravitational, acoustic, or other effects, can cause a change in the psycho-physiological condition of an organism, in Solntsev's opinion. Change of this sort could directly affect the mental state and consciousness of a computer operator. This would not be electronic war or information warfare in the traditional sense, but rather in a nontraditional and non-US sense. It might encompass, for example, a computer modified to become a weapon by using its energy output to emit acoustics that debilitate the operator. It also might encompass, as indicated below, futuristic weapons aimed against man's "open system."

Solntsev also examined the problem of "information noise," which creates a dense shield between a person and external reality. This noise may manifest itself in the form of signals, messages, images, or other items of information. The main target of this noise would be the consciousness of a person or a group of people. Behavior modification could be one objective of information noise; another could be to upset an individual's mental capacity to such an extent as to prevent reaction to any stimulus. Solntsev concludes that all levels of a person's psyche (subconscious, conscious, and "superconscious") are potential targets for destabilization.

According to Solntsev, one computer virus capable of affecting a person's psyche is Russian Virus 666. It manifests itself in every 25th frame of a visual display, where it produces a combination of colors that allegedly put computer operators into a trance. The subconscious perception of the new pattern eventually results in arrhythmia of the heart. Other Russian computer specialists, not just Solntsev, talk openly about this "25th frame effect" and its ability to subtly manage a computer user's perceptions. The purpose of this technique is to inject a thought into the viewer's subconscious. It may remind some of the subliminal advertising controversy in the United States in the late 1950s.
US Views on "Wonder Weapons": Altering the Data-Processing Ability of the Body

What technologies have been examined by the United States that possess the potential to disrupt the data-processing capabilities of the human organism? The 7 July 1997 issue of U.S. News and World Report described several of them designed, among other things, to vibrate the insides of humans, stun or nauseate them, put them to sleep, heat them up, or knock them down with a shock wave.[9] The technologies include dazzling lasers that can force the pupils to close; acoustic or sonic frequencies that cause the hair cells in the inner ear to vibrate and cause motion sickness, vertigo, and nausea, or frequencies that resonate the internal organs causing pain and spasms; and shock waves with the potential to knock down humans or airplanes and which can be mixed with pepper spray or chemicals.[10]

With modification, these technological applications can have many uses. Acoustic weapons, for example, could be adapted for use as acoustic rifles or as acoustic fields that, once established, might protect facilities, assist in hostage rescues, control riots, or clear paths for convoys. These waves, which can penetrate buildings, offer a host of opportunities for military and law enforcement officials. Microwave weapons, by stimulating the peripheral nervous system, can heat up the body, induce epileptic-like seizures, or cause cardiac arrest. Low-frequency radiation affects the electrical activity of the brain and can cause flu-like symptoms and nausea. Other projects sought to induce or prevent sleep, or to affect the signal from the motor cortex portion of the brain, overriding voluntary muscle movements. The latter are referred to as pulse wave weapons, and the Russian government has reportedly bought over 100,000 copies of the "Black Widow" version of them.[11]

However, this view of "wonder weapons" was contested by someone who should understand them. Brigadier General Larry Dodgen, Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Policy and Missions, wrote a letter to the editor about the "numerous inaccuracies" in the U.S. News and World Report article that "misrepresent the Department of Defense's views."[12] Dodgen's primary complaint seemed to have been that the magazine misrepresented the use of these technologies and their value to the armed forces. He also underscored the US intent to work within the scope of any international treaty concerning their application, as well as plans to abandon (or at least redesign) any weapon for which countermeasures are known. One is left with the feeling, however, that research in this area is intense. A concern not mentioned by Dodgen is that other countries or non-state actors may not be bound by the same constraints. It is hard to imagine someone with a greater desire than terrorists to get their hands on these technologies. "Psycho-terrorism" could be the next buzzword.
Russian Views on "Psychotronic War"

The term "psycho-terrorism" was coined by Russian writer N. Anisimov of the Moscow Anti-Psychotronic Center. According to Anisimov, psychotronic weapons are those that act to "take away a part of the information which is stored in a man's brain. It is sent to a computer, which reworks it to the level needed for those who need to control the man, and the modified information is then reinserted into the brain." These weapons are used against the mind to induce hallucinations, sickness, mutations in human cells, "zombification," or even death. Included in the arsenal are VHF generators, X-rays, ultrasound, and radio waves. Russian army Major I. Chernishev, writing in the military journal Orienteer in February 1997, asserted that "psy" weapons are under development all over the globe. Specific types of weapons noted by Chernishev (not all of which have prototypes) were:
·
A psychotronic generator, which produces a powerful electromagnetic emanation capable of being sent through telephone lines, TV, radio networks, supply pipes, and incandescent lamps.
·
An autonomous generator, a device that operates in the 10-150 Hertz band, which at the 10-20 Hertz band forms an infrasonic oscillation that is destructive to all living creatures.
·
A nervous system generator, designed to paralyze the central nervous systems of insects, which could have the same applicability to humans.
·
Ultrasound emanations, which one institute claims to have developed. Devices using ultrasound emanations are supposedly capable of carrying out bloodless internal operations without leaving a mark on the skin. They can also, according to Chernishev, be used to kill.
·
Noiseless cassettes. Chernishev claims that the Japanese have developed the ability to place infra-low frequency voice patterns over music, patterns that are detected by the subconscious. Russians claim to be using similar "bombardments" with computer programming to treat alcoholism or smoking.
·
The 25th-frame effect, alluded to above, a technique wherein each 25th frame of a movie reel or film footage contains a message that is picked up by the subconscious. This technique, if it works, could possibly be used to curb smoking and alcoholism, but it has wider, more sinister applications if used on a TV audience or a computer operator.
·
Psychotropics, defined as medical preparations used to induce a trance, euphoria, or depression. Referred to as "slow-acting mines," they could be slipped into the food of a politician or into the water supply of an entire city. Symptoms include headaches, noises, voices or commands in the brain, dizziness, pain in the abdominal cavities, cardiac arrhythmia, or even the destruction of the cardiovascular system.

There is confirmation from US researchers that this type of study is going on. Dr. Janet Morris, coauthor of The Warrior's Edge, reportedly went to the Moscow Institute of Psychocorrelations in 1991. There she was shown a technique pioneered by the Russian Department of Psycho-Correction at Moscow Medical Academy in which researchers electronically analyze the human mind in order to influence it. They input subliminal command messages, using key words transmitted in "white noise" or music. Using an infra-sound, very low frequency transmission, the acoustic psycho-correction message is transmitted via bone conduction.[13]

In summary, Chernishev noted that some of the militarily significant aspects of the "psy" weaponry deserve closer research, including the following nontraditional methods for disrupting the psyche of an individual:
·
ESP research: determining the properties and condition of objects without ever making contact with them and "reading" peoples' thoughts
·
Clairvoyance research: observing objects that are located just beyond the world of the visible--used for intelligence purposes
·
Telepathy research: transmitting thoughts over a distance--used for covert operations
·
Telekinesis research: actions involving the manipulation of physical objects using thought power, causing them to move or break apart--used against command and control systems, or to disrupt the functioning of weapons of mass destruction
·
Psychokinesis research: interfering with the thoughts of individuals, on either the strategic or tactical level
While many US scientists undoubtedly question this research, it receives strong support in Moscow. The point to underscore is that individuals in Russia (and other countries as well) believe these means can be used to attack or steal from the data-processing unit of the human body.

Solntsev's research, mentioned above, differs slightly from that of Chernishev. For example, Solntsev is more interested in hardware capabilities, specifically the study of the information-energy source associated with the computer-operator interface. He stresses that if these energy sources can be captured and integrated into the modern computer, the result will be a network worth more than "a simple sum of its components." Other researchers are studying high-frequency generators (those designed to stun the psyche with high frequency waves such as electromagnetic, acoustic, and gravitational); the manipulation or reconstruction of someone's thinking through planned measures such as reflexive control processes; the use of psychotronics, parapsychology, bioenergy, bio fields, and psychoenergy;[14] and unspecified "special operations" or anti-ESP training.
The last item is of particular interest. According to a Russian TV broadcast, the strategic rocket forces have begun anti-ESP training to ensure that no outside force can take over command and control functions of the force. That is, they are trying to construct a firewall around the heads of the operators.
Conclusions

At the end of July 1997, planners for Joint Warrior Interoperability Demonstration '97 "focused on technologies that enhance real-time collaborative planning in a multinational task force of the type used in Bosnia and in Operation Desert Storm. The JWID '97 network, called the Coalition Wide-Area Network (CWAN), is the first military network that allows allied nations to participate as full and equal partners."[15] The demonstration in effect was a trade fair for private companies to demonstrate their goods; defense ministries got to decide where and how to spend their money wiser, in many cases without incurring the cost of prototypes. It is a good example of doing business better with less. Technologies demonstrated included:[16]
·
Soldiers using laptop computers to drag cross-hairs over maps to call in airstrikes
·
Soldiers carrying beepers and mobile phones rather than guns
·
Generals tracking movements of every unit, counting the precise number of shells fired around the globe, and inspecting real-time damage inflicted on an enemy, all with multicolored graphics[17]
Every account of this exercise emphasized the ability of systems to process data and provide information feedback via the power invested in their microprocessors. The ability to affect or defend the data-processing capability of the human operators of these systems was never mentioned during the exercise; it has received only slight attention during countless exercises over the past several years. The time has come to ask why we appear to be ignoring the operators of our systems. Clearly the information operator, exposed before a vast array of potentially immobilizing weapons, is the weak spot in any nation's military assets. There are few international agreements protecting the individual soldier, and these rely on the good will of the combatants. Some nations, and terrorists of every stripe, don't care about such agreements.

This article has used the term data-processing to demonstrate its importance to ascertaining what so-called information warfare and information operations are all about. Data-processing is the action this nation and others need to protect. Information is nothing more than the output of this activity. As a result, the emphasis on information-related warfare terminology ("information dominance," "information carousel") that has proliferated for a decade does not seem to fit the situation before us. In some cases the battle to affect or protect data-processing elements pits one mechanical system against another. In other cases, mechanical systems may be confronted by the human organism, or vice versa, since humans can usually shut down any mechanical system with the flip of a switch. In reality, the game is about protecting or affecting signals, waves, and impulses that can influence the data-processing elements of systems, computers, or people. We are potentially the biggest victims of information warfare, because we have neglected to protect ourselves.

Our obsession with a "system of systems," "information dominance," and other such terminology is most likely a leading cause of our neglect of the human factor in our theories of information warfare. It is time to change our terminology and our conceptual paradigm. Our terminology is confusing us and sending us in directions that deal primarily with the hardware, software, and communications components of the data-processing spectrum. We need to spend more time researching how to protect the humans in our data management structures. Nothing in those structures can be sustained if our operators have been debilitated by potential adversaries or terrorists who--right now--may be designing the means to disrupt the human component of our carefully constructed notion of a system of systems.

NOTES

1. I. Chernishev, "Can Rulers Make `Zombies' and Control the World?" Orienteer, February 1997, pp. 58-62.
2. Douglas Pasternak, "Wonder Weapons," U.S. News and World Report, 7 July 1997, pp. 38-46.
3. Ibid., p. 38.
4. FM 101-5-1, Operational Terms and Graphics, 30 September 1997, p. 1-82.
5. Joint Pub 3-13.1, Joint Doctrine for Command and Control Warfare (C2W), 7 February 1996, p. v.
6. The American Heritage Dictionary (2d College Ed.; Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1982), p. 660, definition 4.
7. Denis Snezhnyy, "Cybernetic Battlefield & National Security," Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, No. 10, 15-21 March 1997, p. 2.
8. Victor I. Solntsev, "Information War and Some Aspects of a Computer Operator's Defense," talk given at an Infowar Conference in Washington, D.C., September 1996, sponsored by the National Computer Security Association. Information in this section is based on notes from Dr. Solntsev's talk.
9. Pasternak, p. 40.
10. Ibid., pp. 40-46.
11. Ibid.
12. Larry Dodgen, "Nonlethal Weapons," U.S. News and World Report, 4 August 1997, p. 5.
13. "Background on the Aviary," Nexus Magazine, downloaded from the Internet on 13 July 1997 from www.execpc.com/vjentpr/nexusavi.html, p.7.
14. Aleksandr Cherkasov, "The Front Where Shots Aren't Fired," Orienteer, May 1995, p. 45. This article was based on information in the foreign and Russian press, according to the author, making it impossible to pinpoint what his source was for this reference.
15. Bob Brewin, "DOD looks for IT `golden nuggets,'" Federal Computer Week, 28 July 1997, p. 31, as taken from the Earlybird Supplement, 4 August 1997, p. B 17.
16. Oliver August, "Zap! Hard day at the office for NATO's laptop warriors," The Times, 28 July 1997, as taken from the Earlybird Supplement, 4 August 1997, p. B 16.
17. Ibid.

Lieutenant Colonel Timothy L. Thomas (USA Ret.) is an analyst at the Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. Recently he has written extensively on the Russian view of information operations and on current Russian military-political issues. During his military career he served in the 82d Airborne Division and was the Department Head of Soviet Military-Political Affairs at the US Army's Russian Institute in Garmisch, Germany.

Go to Spring issue Table of Contents.
Go to Cumulative Article Index
Go to Parameters home page.
Reviewed 25 February 1998. Please send comments or corrections to [email protected]

 

[Eos of the Eons]

It's neither. Eos has yet again omitted the space between the words "no" and "one". I think she does this to torment me.

http://www.xoup.net/peeves/noone.php

I do it to torment Rolfe too (see Banachek thread in paranormal)

Dont put yourself through the unnecessary burden of worrying about psychotronic weaponry, its science fiction. Its never going to be anything but fiction.

James will forever worry about it. Noone will ever be able to convince him otherwise.

 

[Eos of the Eons]

This has to be a way to alter the forum softwear to deal with this. If not i think we need different forum softwear

Softwear

Geni's spelling drives me crazy. Never mind my noone bloopers

 

[Eos of the Eons]

Someone tell steve to stop it!!!

How come someone is a word and noone isn't? Eh?

Or is it some one...

hmmm

 

[Rolfe]

If you want to use a single word, Eos, why not try "nobody"? I'm sure no one will have the slightest problem with that.

Geni's spelling is creative, for sure. It's also hightly fluid - I saw "mercury" spelled wrong two different ways in one sentence. This adds significantly to the gaiety of nations. Besides, I can't see much point in trying to discipline someone who seems mildly dyslectic but nevertheless highly intelligent and a good arguer.

A single, repeated, annoying error, though.... Go get 'er, Steve.

Rolfe.

 

[james m. vierling jr]

First off, I would like to point out that there is a big difference between being a skeptic and what some of you people do. Those people just want to be an a**hole for the sake of being an a**hole, which has nothing to do with skepticism. It would however fall under a religious or cult mentality. Obviously some of you have never heard of things like someone being 'railroaded' or being 'blacklisted'. Maybe that doesn't happen either in your little fantasy world. In reality though, unfortunately it does, for know anyway. As for being paranoid, I don't seem to be the one hiding behind fake names or stupid little graphics (There are probably some grade-schoolers that would be impressed by them.). What's the matter scared someone might see how much of an a**hole you really are? Afraid your mommies might find out what you say about them? Afraid that someone will kick your sorry ass? Are you the type of people that either go to work and hurry home so you can sit at your computer all night or just sit there all day and night? Even some of the highly delusional conspiracy theorists put their real name and face on what they write. Oh and by the way, it is not that uncommon for someone to be right about one thing and wrong about a lot of other things. Scaredy cat? Now there is a term I haven't heard since grade school. Actually for you it would be more correct to say frightened little sheep. Now for another twit. It is quite legal to post patents anywhere as long as it is not done to profit off of what is in the patent. The first thing you need to do is go to www.uspto.gov, which is the U.S. patent and trademark office official site and read it. Anyone else going there to find the patents you go to where the page says patent search. From there it will take you to another page that has search options, if you click on patent number search you will go to another page. This page will have a little box for you to type in the patent numbers provided. If the patent number is after about 3880000 (to be exact it would be any patent issued before or after January 1, 1976 as to whether or not you will need the viewer) the site will then display the patent. If you want to see the pretty pictures, diagrams and schematics for those with a brain, then click on the box at the top that says images. If the patent number is smaller, again if the patent was issued before for those with a brain, then the site will take you to a page to download a free viewer to be able to read them. And again if you had read the foreword (that means the part before the main body) in the post you would have known that that is the title of the patent unless otherwise specified. Pertaining to the dips**t that made the left the material world comments. So you don't think that electromagnetic waves exist? Or were you referring to the inane concept of anything for money, the delusional thinking that you are somehow better than someone else just because you have more belongings or the childish "he/she that has the most toys wins"? Sounds pretty pathetic to me. Hey did your neighbor just get a more expensive car than you? How dare they! You better go put them in their place. See I actually liked my little four room efficiency apartment,(the one I had before the destruction of my life) and as I have always said "If it isn't good enough for you, then stay the fu*k out of it. Because that won't bother me a bit."

Now for the post containing the link to the site describing Soviet weaponry. First off if it gives valid details on the weaponry (I have not had the time to check and verify as of the time of posting this) then it may well be worth reading. However as I have pointed out to others before there are several people out there that try to make it look like this country is some squeaky clean goody two-shoes. It is not even close. There are also sites out there that read like they were written by the PR (public relations) person at the pentagon's or other agency's weapons fund drive office. This by the way, creating fear in people to prey upon it, is a form of psychological warfare. Wonder where they got that idea from? I'll give you a clue RELIGION. As to why read the patents, because they show what this country is up to also. And if they read dry to you, they are not usually meant to be entertaining. Granted some of them contain questionable statements, however when there are literally hundreds of them dealing with mind control, 'behavior modification', brain programming and the like people might want to start paying attention. REALITY CHECK.

Here is something that I have written before and sent out. I will fight to the death before I become a mind control slave to any technology or system of religious beliefs (cult). And had the morons with the weaponry checked they would have found out that I have been that way for as long as it was possible for me to be that way. I despise a**-kissers.



.

 

[james m. vierling jr]

The references to looking in industrial catalogues pertain to comments in a different discussion group. And there will be some things in this post that have already been stated in posts here before. This post also contains comments on various post topics to a different group. I will however leave it in it's entirety as was posted elsewhere.

First off, I am 38 years old. Anyway, as for looking in industrial catalogues, anything in them would more than likely have a patent or at least fall under the other embodiments and/or modifications as the author/s of the patent/s states can be made. Again, if people read the patents in the list that I posted/e-mailed then they would see that some of them are worded so as to apply in an industrial setting. I am not the only person that has accumulated a patent list either. For example,
www.ou-research.com/ewpatents/nsaPR.html has a few patents as well as an article on Project Stargate. When reading the article one should keep in mind the blatant falsities claimed in order to prey upon the delusions created in people by various religious (cult) programming. If peoples' thoughts "unintentionally emanated" from their bodies or parts of their bodies (brain), then why would they need to irradiate (attack) someone's brain to pick them up (Evoked potentials from EEG patterns)? They don't and they wouldn't. Another site with a patent list would be www.web.wannadoo.be/reveil/somepatents.html which has about 140 patents listed on it, about 30 or 40 of which are on the list that I posted/e-mailed. This site contains abstracts from some of the patents. There are also more patents on this site about 'implantable medical devices'. Yes, I went through all of them also. This site however does not contain anything after the early to mid 1990s. There is also a site that I don't have the exact address with me at home. It was montana something and it is entirely about department of defense patents. It seemed more about chemical and biological research, but there were a few that I wrote down to check into when I get the chance.

Anyone wanting to read more about Project Stargate, there is a website for the Cognitive Sciences Laboratory. Basically, it was/is a government funded project for supposedly investigating paranormal or parapsychology. There are articles there from both people that wanted to continue the experiments, which allegedly stopped around 1995 or 1996 (started 1972), and ones from people to get the experimental funding stopped. Basically the fuss was a form of psychological warfare playing both sides, or allowing one side to play itself as a misdirection tactic so they wouldn't see what was really going on, along the lines of the UFO stuff. It was/is also another example of preying on peoples' fears, delusions or just plain ignorance in some cases to obtain guinea pigs and still be able to keep their official deniability cover. In reality the 'project' was nothing more than a way to perform neurological experiments on people and a way to further the development of weaponry based on said findings. Also a way to find out how easily different things could be planted in someone's mind. A little time frame for you, the aforementioned project started 1972 - the remote monitoring patent filed 1974, granted 1976 - MKUltra 'exposed' 1977 - the aforementioned project continues until 1995-6 officially anyway.


By the way, the pieces of garbage that took part in or are still taking part in any of the mind control atrocities (the experimenter end) should have been or should be tried for crimes against humanity and executed. Throw in those that cover-up for them and those that aid in their atrocities also. If anyone is interested in finding out who a lot of the people that were in on the attacks on me are, some of them are mentioned in an account of the attacks before about November 2002 posted at www.mindcontrolforums.com/vierling.html . I should point out that other than that posting, I do not have any affiliation with that site. I would also like to point out that everything there was given to the Mishawaka police department along with what it states was sent to other agencies. It is 81 or 82 pages when saved as a word document. It may also be hard to read or follow as it is a series of different sets of faxes that either fill in or extrapolate on the first set.

Anyway, those that say the government doesn't experiment on people then why is the FDA using the mass media, it was on CNN Headline News this past week, to recruit volunteers for an experimental drug? Who do you think funds and gathers the data from various experiments like sleep study for example? The military has and still does experiment on its own members and others.

Those that use entrainment devices or methods on themselves, ask yourself this; would a bullet do any less damage if you shot yourself?

To reiterate a point, religions have been using various forms of hypnosis and entrainment (self induced included) to aid in their brainwashing for thousands of years.

A brief history lesson for those that would say this country was founded on religious principles. Late 1400s to early 1500s 'explorers' came to the Americas and brought with them disease which they spread. These explorers came took (stole) whatever they found that was valuable to them and would kill the peoples already there if they opposed them in this. The explorers also kidnapped people to take back and put on display for their rulers and religious leaders. These explorers were usually highly religious and would not leave without the blessing of their religious leaders. Next, 1500s brought more settlers to the Americas (a lot of whom were convicted criminals in the countries they came from) to do the same as the explorers. Late 1500s to mid 1600s; The oh so wonderful witch trials. A religious excuse for torture. The mid 1600s to late 1700s - More settlers often bringing with them slaves. These slaves were often sold to them by other tribes of differing religious beliefs. Not all of the slaves were black either. These settlers also would take whatever land they wanted and often killed to do so. After all they didn't consider the 'heathens' that weren't members of their cult to be equal as humans. That applied to the slaves also. Late 1700s the constitution when written called blacks less than human, and said only white males could vote. Said slaves were often beaten into submission to change their beliefs to that of the cult of their owner. Those would be an example of some of the religious principles. This type of s*** is pretty common in all religions.

Again, what religion would say that it was alright to say it was false (freedom of speech). The only way that separation of church and state would be a religious principle would be if religion tried to say that it meant they could do whatever they wanted because of their religious (cult) beliefs and the state couldn't say or do anything about it. In other words laws wouldn't apply to them. Freedom of religion should have been written freedom from religion.

Also, I would like to point out that the experiments by the nazis, the night squads of the Soviet Union, experiments and atrocities by various countries all over the world have been done under the guise of so-called national security. And replace a religious entity with a flag, or add a flag, and what do you have - patriotism. In other words this type of s*** is NOT alright no matter where it is done or who is doing it.

The usage of the various entrainment devices (electromagnetic or other) and the subliminal devices on someone else is an attack. Since they are often advertised as a way to get someone to have sex with you without them knowing it is being used, they should carry the same sentence as if the person using them had drugged someone and had sex with them. The above just shows how much of a pathetic a**hole the person using them in that way is.

The Shomer-tec Super Sonic Nausea device should also be banned.

I do not know if the above links have been posted here before or not.

Death to psychotronic weaponry. Religion is fraud. James M. Vierling Jr.

P.S. The entire signature is Death to psychotronic weaponry any and everyone that uses it, produces it, funds it or covers-up for it. All religions are terroristic, brainwashing, mind control, fraudulent, bulls*** cults.

Have a nice day.

 

[james m. vierling jr]

Three varieties of electromagnetic pulses are the on/off type, the power surge type and the modulation pulse. The on/off type can be described as flipping a light switch on and off or having a computer controlled time between the on and off phases of the transmission, which in turn can also be time-varying. Time-varying simply means that the amount of time in either the on or the off mode can be variable. Examples: 1 second on followed by one second off then one-half second on followed by one-half second off, or one-half second on followed by one and one-half second off, etc. Any amounts of time can be used as long as not continuously repetitive. (Frequency varying would be the same except substituting frequency for time, and both can be used at once.) A laser turned on then off again, regardless of time left on, would/could be an example of this type of pulse weapon. This also applies to visual entrainment devices and visual sub/supraliminal devices. (Which should all be classified as weapons and banned in my opinion.)

The power surge pulse is actually a combination of a continuous wave transmission and intermittent pulses or power surges along the same frequency. Said power surges may also be time-varying. Note the frequency of a transmission is not dependent upon the power level of the transmission. The power surge would follow the directionality of the original continuous wave transmission. An example would be, a doctor using a medical laser (which is defined as an optical maser). The doctor first turning the laser on at a low power setting to locate the spot where he/she wants to begin cutting, then when said spot located turning the power setting up to where cutting will begin. The size of the laser 'beam' and frequency remaining constant due to the ability of the apparatus used to focus the 'beam' at both the lower and higher power settings. This would apply regardless if the frequency used were within the visible spectrum range or not. Another example being a radio or television broadcast, increasing or decreasing the power level of the transmissions will not change either the frequency or the 'information' modulated onto said transmission. This type of pulse can also be applied to entrainment.

The modulation pulse simply being the broadcast of an electromagnetic wave on one frequency with no modulation, then at intervals broadcasting the same frequency and same power level just with 'information' modulated onto it.

A couple of quick definitions before I go into how the various pulses could be applied to the psychotronic weaponry.

1. Standing wave - This is actually a contradiction in terms. A wave transmission will not stop until it dissipates, loses energy or is acted upon by an external force. In other words, if someone broadcast 1 wavelength of any frequency then stopped the transmission, the wave or wavelength would not remain stationary. A continuous broadcast on the same frequency with nothing acting upon it will follow the same wave shape, thus producing what may appear as a standing wave form. However, the energy is moving in the wave shape in the direction of the broadcast. The wave shape or form is simply being re-supplied with energy.

2. Standing field - This occurs when a field is created between two or more objects and said field does not extend beyond said objects. The intensity of this field may or may not change, however the waves (energy along the wave forms) in said field are in motion. This field also occurs around a single object that has been supplied with energy and emits continuous waves from it. This standing field occupies the space around the object that the waves extend to before dissipation.

3. Scalar wave - This is again a contradiction in terms. Wave implies motion. While certain parts or descriptions of them may be scalar quantities, the wave itself is not unless used to describe the number of waves. The intensity or power level of the wave can be described as a scalar quantity, (1 watt). The frequency of the wave (10 Hz) could again be described as a scalar quantity. All waves however, have direction. This would also apply to the description of a pulse.

The electromagnetic pulses as would/could apply to the psychotronic weaponry. Note the frequencies mentioned are examples. The specific evoked potential modulation applies both the on/of and the power surge type pulses and also to the continuous broadcast used in the power surge type pulse. Entrainment with the on/off pulse can occur due to the frequency of the pulse, provided it is within the frequencies that human brainwaves are, or can occur due to the pulse frequency (repetition rate). For example, pulses with a 10 Hz frequency pulsed at a repetition rate that someone's brain interprets as an 8Hz stimulation would result in entrainment to the 8Hz frequency. *(This is along the same lines as visual or auditory entrainment, as neither entrains someone's brain to the frequency of the stimulus, light or sound, but to the frequency or repetition rate of the stimulus application.) The above mentioned entrainment could also occur due to the 10Hz pulses being modulated with specific evoked potentials patterns which the persons' under attack brains would then interpret as an 8Hz repetition rate stimulus or stimuli. Use of the evoked potentials modulated onto broadcasts also leads to the use of sub/supraliminal placement of specific evoked potentials within the aforementioned evoked potentials. For example if images (evoked potentials corresponding to) were used in attacking someone, then by placing an image every so many 'frames' (modulation patterns) like sub/supraliminals in a television broadcast. Which also can be used as a method of entrainment. This also leads to a fourth type of pulse. A power surge within a pulse type of attack. Or if you prefer, turning on at one power level then increasing/decreasing the power level then returning to original power level then turning off. Which could be done on a microsecond level within a millisecond pulse.

The power surge on a continuos wave pulse would be much the same as above. For example a 25Hz continuous wave could have power surge pulses that would entrain someone's brain to the repetition rate of the pulses. Or if you prefer, even though entrainment would occur with the continuous wave 25Hz broadcast (to 25Hz), the repetition rate of the power surge pulses would override that entrainment and cause entrainment to the repetition rate of the pulses. This would be especially true when the pulses were modulated with specific evoked potentials which would act like a localized stimulus effect on the person under attack with the evoked potentials.

The modulation pulse could also be used similar to the other pulse types. This could also be used to attack more than one person at a time on the same frequency, as each person's brain will only decipher the specific evoked potentials attributed to it. A rough comparison would be like the antenna for wireless internet usage. The same antenna can be used to both receive and transmit a thousand or more signals at once which will only be interpreted by a specific computer. Many of the computers will use the same frequency but will have their own specific signals. (*NOTE by receive I mean receive the remote neural monitoring signal/s)


Those are some things to consider for detecting the broadcasts. For said detection purposes, seeing the images or displaying the words or turning back into sound from a speaker is not needed, though can be done. What is needed is a way to correlate the broadcasts to what occurs in the brain of the person under attack. So starting with the device in patent number 6377833 (or similar) or an EEG machine with electrode placement to monitor all or, at least, most parts of the brain at once and a computer program similar to the one in the patent above. Also a program to display the mapping of the EEG signals in the brain. This should at least give a starting or reference point for detection of the broadcasts. This would also be of use in detecting the remote neural monitoring frequency that occurs and goes back to the attackers, which again would also aid in determining the frequency or frequencies of the attacks. Use of various forms of electromagnetic shielding would also narrow down the possibilities and could be used in a 1 layer at a time approach to monitor any changes or just all at once. There were several devices and modifications to them mentioned in the patent list and follow-ups to it, and there are probably hundreds of others, to aid in the detection of the incoming and outgoing frequencies and their intensity levels. The above patent states that it can register different intensities for correlation to the broadcasts. The computer should also be able to overlay any modulated signals from the detected broadcasts to then correlate with the signals from monitoring the brain. Any broadcasts meant to interfere with the process could also be detected and filtered out in the computer. The correlation process does not have to be done in real-time at first, (meaning correlating as it happens, as the signals would have to be time matched). As a sampling of the brain signals can be stored in the computer along with all of the signals detected and then the computer can be used to analyze and compare. This will then lead to frequency detection and then real-time comparison. This would also aid in detecting any frequency hopping. Again once the signal frequencies have been detected triangulation is a pretty simple process, and could be done with the help of someone located a distance from the first place given the proper frequency, intensity and phase detectors.

 

[james m. vierling jr]

Pressure waves and electromagnetic waves are not the same thing, nor do the properties of one necessarily apply to the other.

From the McGraw Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical terms.
Hertz - Unit of frequency: a periodic oscillation has a frequency of n hertz if in 1 second it goes through n cycles. Also known as cycles per second.

From Encyclopedia of Electronics, Stan Gibilisco editor.
Hertz - the standard unit of frequency. Abbreviated Hz. A frequency of 1 complete cycle per second is a frequency of 1 Hz. The term hertz became widespread in the late 1960s, and is now used instead of cycles per second.

From The New Lexicon Webster's Dictionary of the English Language.
Hertzian wave - an electromagnetic radiation produced by electrical oscillation in a conductor, of wavelengths ranging from the order of millimeters to kilometers [after Heinrich Hertz]
Sound wave - a periodic progression of alternations between high and low pressure through an elastic medium.

So by definition a sound 'wave' is a pressure wave and is not representable by the Hertzian wave designation (Hz). This in turn means that any usage of supersonic, hypersonic or ultrasonic followed by the Hz representation is either a misrepresentation (misuse of the term), or is referring to electromagnetic radiation without calling it electromagnetic radiation. If tapping a finger once on a table created a series of sound waves then it should be heard more than once, or every time the next sound wave came into contact with the ear and started the hearing process. Hearing once would by definition mean that it has a frequency of one. Saying a guitar string has a frequency? Certainly not a stable one. Thus the 'twang' effect. The first pluck (strum) causes the string to vibrate yes, however this vibration becomes smaller (the distance above and below stationary that the string travels) and smaller every time a cycle (down, up and return to where it was stationary) elapses. This in turn causes a continuous changing 'sound' perception in a human. Such continuous sound then would still have a 'frequency' of ½ or 1 (maybe less depending on the taughtness of the string) as the twang lasts for one or more seconds. If this were in waves it would sound like T - W - A - N - G. In other words a frequency designation of some sort may be assigned in reference to the amount of time said guitar string will complete the down up and return to middle cycle, but it would be merely a repetition rate which would not be determinate of the pressure or sound 'wave' as all the strings can be made to travel said cycle distance yet all would produce a different pressure wave. And since sound 'waves' emanate in a spherical pattern the term wave doesn't actually apply. It would be more of a sound front which is why the still vibrating string keeps the sound going after the initial front as it is still adding vibrational energy in lessening amounts. It is like a kinetic energy effect between the atoms or molecules of the elastic medium traveling through or solid object running into and transferring the energy to cause vibrations which in turn pass the energy on to the atoms or molecules on the other side of solid object. Even when representing the vibrations passed on this way they would lessen from atom to atom or molecule to molecule so the frequency would constantly change.

Also using the terminology that any kind of pressure wave is modulated onto an electromagnetic wave is false. What is modulated is the electromagnetic wave. This modulation is simply a predetermined pattern corresponding to the pressure waves (sounds) that are input to a device and that a receiver tuned to the frequency of the electromagnetic broadcast picks up, reads and causes the speaker to vibrate causing a pressure wave or series of pressure waves in a predetermined manner to represent what was input to the system. This modulation is not dependent upon the frequency of the electromagnetic wave. Different radio stations with different broadcast frequencies can play the same song. This is also true of computer speech programs, in that the computer is preprogrammed with a modulation pattern, or a program to read electrical impulses, to send to a speaker output that produces the corresponding vibrations.

That is also one way the psychotronic weaponry works. The predetermined modulation pattern being the evoked potential pattern, obtained through the remote neural monitoring, which is different for everyone. This is one reason that they can attack one person in a group and only that person's brain will 'receive' the modulated pattern. This is the same for the words, phrases or images.

 

[Zombified]

Wee, where to start.

The "hertz" as a unit of measurement is simply a unit of frequency equal to 1/second. It can apply to any periodic phenomenon, and applies equally to electromagnetic and acoustical signals.

"Hertzian" used to be used as a description of electromagnetic waves, but that term is rather archaic now. That the name of a unit of measurement is derived from the same name is of no consequence whatsoever, except perhaps as an homage to the man himself.

All wave-like phenomena have similar characteristics, and generally have a similar form to their mathematical descriptions. The differences are in choice of physical variables. In an acoustical wave, the variable of interest is air pressure. In an EM wave, the variables of interest are the electrical and magnetic field strengths.

There is one significant difference between EM and acoustical waves: EM waves can be polarized, because the direction of wave propagation is orthogonal to the actual vibration, whereas the changes in pressure in an acoustical wave go in the same direction as the wave.

Guitars do, in fact, have definite frequencies when plucked. The twang you are hearing is a change of timbre over time. Musical instruments do not produce sinusoidal signals, they produce complex signals with many harmonics (additional components at multiples of the fundamental frequency). Generally in a physical system higher frequencies decay faster than lower ones, so the higher frequency harmonics die out faster, which changes the waveform of the note. This is modelled in synthesizers which often use a swept low-pass filter (as in a Moog or TB303) to attenuate the harmonics of some basic signal. Physical modelling synthesizers generally include lowpass filters in their feedback loops for the same effect (for example, the Karplus-Strong algorithm, which simulates strings).

For reference, the musical note A4 has a frequency of 440Hz.

 

[Pyrrho]

Mr. Vierling, I am officially warning you to follow Forum rules regarding language. The Rules can be found here:

http://www.randi.org/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=50

Another such incident will result in a 3-day suspension, meaning that you will be denied the ability to post for 72 hours.

 

[BillHoyt]

First off, I would like to point out that there is a big difference between being a skeptic and what some of you people do. Those people just want to be an a**hole for the sake of being an a**hole, which has nothing to do with skepticism. It would however fall under a religious or cult mentality. Obviously some of you have never heard of things like someone being 'railroaded' or being 'blacklisted'.

Obviously you've never heard of the fallacy of the subject/motive shift.

 

[Eos of the Eons]

I looove all the name calling. Precisely why I use juvenile terms like scaredy cat, it fits with this thread perfectly.

Answer my questions james.

1. Why aren't you working.

2. What is your source of income. Mine is work.


My only conclusion is that james will not answer these questions because it would prove my point.

I do not "hide" behind anything. My site has my picture and name on it. I like my avatar and my handle. I did put some effort into both. Must come up with a February theme on my avatar soon enough.

Let's see. My attempts to seek out james' personality have been successful thus far. My posts have illicited anger and name calling. Rather typical.

Since james is rooted in denial and paranoia, there's not much point to my posts, but to try to get him to think of why he thinks someone would want to drive him insane with mind control.

Why would anyone bother with you james? What would be the point on using the psychotronics on you?

You are obviously smart james. Too bad those smarts aren't being put to good use. Instead they are wasted on this obsession of yours.

Anyway, those that say the government doesn't experiment on people then why is the FDA using the mass media, it was on CNN Headline News this past week, to recruit volunteers for an experimental drug? Who do you think funds and gathers the data from various experiments like sleep study for example? The military has and still does experiment on its own members and others.

Recruit volunteers.


Are you a volunteer james?

Why would they bother with someone not volunteering?

You say you are a victim. Volunteers are not victims.

Your above point is moot.

Control with religion is very observable. People gather and read and sing and etc. etc. You are told to follow the herd of sheep or suffer the imagined consequences. In some cases there are drugs involved. This does change the brain physically/chemically.

Mind control via a machine that is not even attached to an individual is not possible. You are not a victim.

Here is something that I have written before and sent out. I will fight to the death before I become a mind control slave to any technology or system of religious beliefs (cult). And had the morons with the weaponry checked they would have found out that I have been that way for as long as it was possible for me to be that way. I despise a**-kissers.

Fight to the death? What death?

 

[Zep]

I like how James quotes LONG articles written by Tart and Eldon Byrd, both noted long-time crackpots and fervent believers in Uri Geller and clairvoyents and such fairy-like stuff.

If you are so convinced you are being watched and listened to, James, it seems fairly obvious that you can tell EXACTLY WHEN this is being done to you by ONE PARTICULAR person, and also when it stops. If you think that is correct, you could be in the running for the JREF $1,000,000 prize. Care to try for it?

 

[El Greco]

This could have made a great X-Files episode. How unfortunate that I don't see anything resembling Dana Scully around.

 

[Zep]

Hi James!

Have you decided to put your ability to the JREF Challenge yet?

 

[shemp]

Why does anyone bother baiting this poor guy? He's clearly schizophrenic, and those who taunt him are only feeding his paranoia.

I worked with a guy like this, though not quite as far gone. He was one of the "tin helmet crowd." He was sure that he was being watched, followed, harassed, etc. However, he did have his lucid moments when he knew he was loopy, and would even make fun of it himself. He was a former Scientologist who got kicked out for being too loopy (and for not having any money).

Drop it guys. Leave him alone, and he'll find another place to play.

 

[Eos of the Eons]

I'd like to see a lucid moment where james will realize that we won't play into delusions, and that is doing him a favor. It would be more mean to go along and not say anything, and just let him think we agree with his "findings".

I don't agree with taunting. I do feel james needs to look at why we don't just ignore him.

If that makes him angry and tell us that we have our heads in the sand, then it just shows even more how ill he is. I've gotten this all my life from my mom. If I just let her rant on, then she thinks I agree with her. Then when I finally counteract some of her points, then she flies off the handle and says I won't face "it" all of a sudden. That now I'm being brainwashed to not believe her. Then she tries to save me in a variety of crazy ways (telling off my in-laws or threatening to shoot her dad-whomever she thinks is turning me against her).

It's better if the ill person knows up front how you feel about what they are saying.

Just my experience.

 

[Luke T.]

I'd like to see a lucid moment where james will realize that we won't play into delusions...

Unfortunately, Steve Grenard does play into people's delusions. And as long as there is one person who does, people like james will get sicker and sicker, fed by the likes of SG.

 

[BillHoyt]

Unfortunately, Steve Grenard does play into people's delusions.

I had never stepped back far enough to see it this way.