Read it again if you don´t get it. It´s right in front of
you. So don´t bore me in a serious discussion if you
don´t know. I reply later to open questions. To all
of you who raise them.
Then I'm writing you off.
ALl it would take is a simple, clear statement of what you meant. Instead, you want to further insult me.
If you're talking about Iraq, the same thing applies. Iraq invaded and took over a soveriegn nation (Kuwait) for no reason. Iraq consistently and constantly violated the UN sanctions against it (those that authorized force) after Kuwait was liberated. Iraq conducted chemical weapons trials against it's own people. Iraq (specifically, Saddam) drive what was once a rising power in the Middle East into a third world nation. Saddam used torture amd intimidation against his own people, denied them the benefits of technology, disallowed freedom of speech and action, and forced compliance from the populace through various means.
Even this is an insult.
You are, at best, a moral relativist who does not have the cajones to actually take a stand, and you allow your prejudice against the U.S. to color your perception.
The U.S has done wrong, yes. But certain comparisons are not valid, yours among them.
Besides, even this doesn't apply. The U.S. never labelled the Iraqi citizens as terrorists, or even most of the Iraqi military. Only specific elements of the government and specific factions in the country, those we are still fighting (and those that are still targetting innocents, using children as shields, and attacking non-combatants).
One side is the terrorist, I've seen no justification for applying that label to the other side yet.
