psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
Why single me out?Jesus Christ, just drop it, will ya?
Why single me out?Jesus Christ, just drop it, will ya?
How wonderful for you!
I'm sure there are many examples of teachers being joy makers etc, etc.
I would in fact hope that ALL teachers were like that, but the sad fact of life is that they are not. There are many examples of the sorts of things I posted happening, and THEY SHOULD NOT BE HAPPENING AT ALL!
Can we agree on that at least, that they should NOT be happening at all!!
Why single me out?
You mentioned John Walker referring to 'how sport is run in schools'
Not that occasionally something might happen of which you disapprove, but 'how sport is run in schools'.
I showed you were wrong
There is nothing wrong with giving others a turn, so long as it is not in a competitive situation. Pulling the team's star player just to "give someone else a turn" lets down the other members of the team who have worked hard to get where they are.ETA I think it quite possible that your anecdotes are partial anecdotes, that the boy pumping his fist may well also have been showing unacceptable behaviour towards others and the boy throwing up his hands in celebration may also have shown an unsporting attitude. And I also wonder what is wrong with giving others a turn.
Did you? Where?
Also, these three anecdotes (as you call them) were directly from my own personal experience as a teacher; I was there, watching when they happened. Are are now seriously telling me that I didn't understand fully what I saw?
I apologise for calling them anecdotes: what are they?
I am seriously telling you that you may well have filtered the events through your own prejudices, and that you did not necessarily have all the relevant facts.
All the boys at School House, Shrewsbury, knew of this abuse. The identities of Trench’s special victims were also well known. Peel quotes the then headmaster of Shrewsbury, Jack Peterson, describing the reaction when, in 1952, he disclosed the name of the new housemaster to the boys at School House. ‘There was first an audible intake of breath, then the widest grins on all faces and finally when I got out of the room a pandemonium of excited and happy chattering.’ Peterson, whose lack of contact with schoolboys was legendary, took this to be a sign of delight at Trench’s appointment. In fact, as I clearly recall, the laughter was mainly in mockery, the chattering in amazement, distress and even fear. Only two years previously Trench had been ‘house tutor’ (with extensive powers to beat boys) and his passion for bare bums was the subject of much gossip. Older boys with broken voices and hairs on their legs had nothing to worry about. Treble-voiced, smooth-legged classics students should try to keep out of his way. Most of the older boys who remembered Trench were inclined to excuse his strange behaviour on the grounds that he had had ‘a bad war’ – at least six months building the Burma railway as a prisoner of the Japanese. I could never quite understand why ill-treatment by the Japanese should drive a man to child abuse, so I am delighted to find the Burma excuse put to flight by Francis King, a school contemporary of Trench’s. He remembers Trench the schoolboy as ‘supercilious, capricious and cruel’ long before the Japanese ever laid a finger on him.
Mark Peel describes the floggings at Shrewsbury as ‘a real outlet for Trench’s unabated enthusiasm and carefree simplicity’. His line is backed up by other, older boys of the time who insist that Trench’s beatings didn’t do them any harm. My own often expressed hostility is explained away by Peel with reference to my supposed political antagonism to Trench. I am ashamed to admit that when I was 14 or 15 at Shrewsbury I had no political views at all. Nor is the case for or against Trench a rerun, as Peel pretends throughout, of the old argument for or against corporal punishment. Enthusiasm throughout the public schools for corporal punishment obviously provided a cover for Trench’s consistent abuse. But Trench was assaulting boys in his charge for one reason only: his own sexual gratification.
So it's not about 3 posters having a disagreement?I know. These days everyone should be treated completely equally regardless of what they may or may not have done.
In the spirit of political correctness I hereby declare that everyone hang their head in shame.
Here's a good example of the type of schooling that went on before the dreaded spectacle of PC:
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v18/n17/paul-foot/diary
I guess you can't knock political correctness when it gives you such wonderful new stuff....
Kids Schoolyard Games
Visually Impared Person's bluff
Personhunt
Postperson's knock
Caucasianhorse
etc...
And if they aren't interested because there is no competition,
no pay-off at the end,
no feel-good, then what?
When I see local schools that, in my time both as a student and as a teacher, used to be able to field three Rugby XVs (I played for the Third XV as a 13 year old and progresses to play First XV as a sixth former), three Cricket XIs, four Soccer XIs, and a whole load of Track & Field athletes, and now they can only field one (and in cricket, they even struggle to do that) then I know there is something wrong systemically.
I think Sir John Walker is exactly right about how sport is run in schools. I have seen some of this first hand...
► an eight year old boy who threw his hands in the air in celebration when he won a sprint race on Wednesday afternoon sports, only to be told off by a teacher for being inconsiderate towards the kids who didn't win;
► standing down the rugby team's best player to "give another boy a turn" (that player's father eventually pulled him from our school team end he ended up playing for a club junior grade team instead);
► a kid who "fist pumped" when he scored a winning point playing tennis (imitating Rafa?) gets a telling off for being arrogant.
In all these cases, the teachers are being killjoys, and are, whether they understand it or not, discouraging excellence, and encouraging the idea that you must keep your head down and and not be overtly proud of your achievements. Its Political Correctness and Tall Poppy Syndrome of the worst kind.
Why single me out?
Nonsense! All I have ever said is that if you are going to "call BS" then you need evidence. Every time I restated that point the other two posters responded by misrepresenting me and my posts.Because you're the one who started the derail and can't drop it.
Nonsense! All I have ever said is that if you are going to "call BS" then you need evidence.
Every time I restated that point the other two posters responded by misrepresenting me and my posts.
It is clear why you want me to let them do that without comment - you're on their side.
Nonsense! All I have ever said is that if you are going to "call BS" then you need evidence. Every time I restated that point the other two posters responded by misrepresenting me and my posts.
It is clear why you want me to let them do that without comment - you're on their side.
I don't believe you.
The right thing to do with children's sports.
I don't believe you.
Nope.
... (whoosh!) ...
And I can't drop it?... (whoosh!) ...
And I can't drop it?![]()