Is there a brief summary of this thread someplace in the 51 pages?
If not could somebody summarize killtown's theory and what the opposing view is?
From what I can tell somebody allegedly took a picture of smoke emanating from the flight 93 crash.
The center of the smoke column (derived by taking into account the white and red barns) isn't exactly on top of the hole caused by the flight 93 crash.
In addition there has been a claim that the look of the smoke is not right for an airplane crash.
So Killtown believes the photo was faked? For what purpose does Killtown believe the photo was faked?
No doubt I am confused, please feel free to mock me for that or my laziness in not going through the preceding 51 pages to develop a better understanding of this thread. And, as always, please feel free to mock me for any spelling or grammatical errors.
Davefoc, if you haven't followed this from the beginning, believe me, it's not worth your while getting into it now. I'm honestly not sure why I'm still persisting. I think it's that weird frustration you have when you're dealing with a malfunctioning computer or something. You know it is supposed to do X when you push that button, but it just won't. You keep pushing the button anyway, stupidly assuming that eventually it will do what it is supposed to do.
Similarly, I keep thinking "even Killtown can't be that obtuse, even he must eventually realize that he has made not one single substantive argument in this entire thread"--but he just keeps on coming back with his blue-screen-of-death-ultra-stupidity: "I pwned you, you can't deal with my B-52 Kung-Fu! Now I'll show you my photoshopped version, Crane Style! Hi-ya!"
I guess it's the weird fascination that someone can be intelligent enough to write in (mostly) complete sentences, but so monumentally incapable of following even the most simple precepts of argumentative logic.