Pilots For 9/11 Truth Present Their Math

[Baylor]

That's because you were tied to the OFFICIAL CIT STORY. Your flight path had to adhere to the CIT FLIGHT 77 FLIGHT PATH and fly over the Navy Annex, North of the gas station and over the pentagon. You would have had hundreds of eyewitnesses saying they saw the plane fly over the pentagon. Come on and try to be honest about it. Your flight path was impossible and nothing like what the hundreds of witnesses testified to and nothing like the flight path the FAA has now admitted to. Your flight path was no better than TheLoneBedroom's nonsense setting up some flyover flight path based on his disjointed imagination.

 

[BCR]

nothing like the flight path the FAA has now admitted to

What kind of nonsense is this? I have just about everything the FAA has released thus far and I assure you that you cannot source this claim. Are you referring to the animation released by the FAA that I posted at YouTube? If you are, you might want to back off since that is a NORAD created animation. More will be forthcoming regarding the back-ground on this animation, but suffice to say it is based on 84 RADES radar data which lacked coverage of the Pentagon area beyond the Sheraton below 300 feet. It is impossible for any flight path segment to be based on that data for the final 6-8 seconds of flight of AAL77.

Try again!

 

[KDLarsen]

<snip>

Congratulations, you've cracked the case of 9/11. Now go and see someone who can do something about it, like an attorney, police officer or politician.

Don't worry, we'll be waiting here until you get back

 

[applecorped]

 

[Foolmewunz]

Oh, I get it.... the OP was being sarcastic.

I looked through the whole thread expecting numbers, and all we get is Yukon King's dumber half posting contradictory interviewees again.

Oh, well, Ultima1 should be back sometime tomorrow, right? Maybe he'll have some num- .....

I can't do it! I almost got that line out without laughing, but even for a PFT-CIT thread, it's too improbable to type with a straight face.

 

[WildCat]

And just like that, the thread linked to in the OP has been disappeared by Cap'n Bob.

So SPreston, why does your hero hide from the hard questions? Does it ever occur to you you're being taken for a chump and a fool by Cap'n Bob and his ilk?

 

[twinstead]

I think SPreston just needs a hug

 

[jhunter1163]

Fascism ROCKS!

 

[Jonnyclueless]

"Oh, well, Ultima1 should be back sometime tomorrow, right? Maybe he'll have some num- ..... "

Well, at least some good quotes for signatures.

 

[SPreston]

And just like that, the thread linked to in the OP has been disappeared by Cap'n Bob.

It is? Disappeared? Then why am I looking at it right now? It is still open and still getting posted to. Oh yeah there was one of your guys there knocking a video that he admitted he had never seen. Same old same old.

 

[DGM]

It is? Disappeared? Then why am I looking at it right now? It is still open and still getting posted to. Oh yeah there was one of your guys there knocking a video that he admitted he had never seen. Same old same old.

Your right I can still access the thread.

Now post the math that proves your flight path and smear egg in our faces. GO FOR IT TWOOFER!!!!!

 

[WildCat]

It is? Disappeared? Then why am I looking at it right now? It is still open and still getting posted to. Oh yeah there was one of your guys there knocking a video that he admitted he had never seen. Same old same old.

Looks like Cap'n Bob brought it back.

Has Turbofraud posted his math yet?

No?

I'm shocked!

 

[Hokulele]

<snipping irrelevancy>

A picture may be worth 1,000 words, but equations are priceless.

 

[Bobert]

I mean really why provide secondary stuff like math and physical evidence when you have a bunch of cherry picked witness statements?
AND THOSE CRAZY NWO BACKED JUDGES!
Ya like they want PHYSICAL EVIDENCE?
What is wrong with them?
WAKE UP BUSH LOYALIST (GL's) SHEEPLE!!!!!!!11

******All contents copyright C 2002-2005 by Pilotes For Da Truth. All rights reserved. No part of this document or the related files may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by any means (electronic, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the publisher.*****

 

[apathoid]

Since its obvious that Balsawood Bob has no intentions(or ability) to do the math that will prove/disprove the stupidest hypothesis ever conceived for any purpose, why don't we Government Loyalists(of all corners of the political spectrum and nationalities) do it for him?

Yes, in retaliation there will be many stupid smilies which are supposed to convey extreme incredulity, and of course some lame attempts at a debunking which ultimately make them look like even bigger fools, and we'll be back at square one - but it'll be fun!

 

[BCR]

Math solved ----

[latex]$$ P_{cit} = \frac{W^{n}_p}{i} $$[/latex]

Where,

[latex]$$ P_{cit} $$[/latex] = CIT flight path,

[latex]$$ W^{n}_p $$[/latex] = witnesses who saw the plane hit the Pentagon to the n^th (number of witnesses) power,

and [latex]$$ i $$[/latex] = insanity (an imaginary number per TjW).

 

[beachnut]

Ed Paik, he said 77 was near the tower, on the read path! Oops!

See the tower behind Paik as he shows the flight path behind him and to the Pentagon impact point, making your, p4t, or CIT presentation total junk. As in wrong. Yep, Paik said 77 almost, or did hit the top of the tower behind him. As a trained aircraft accident investigator, I judge your ideas on 9/11 wrong; and your Paik blue line is junk.

Who drew the blue line? It has impossible turn.
This blue path instantly changes 5 degrees of heading. That is infinite G force, no wings for your flight path. So I will give you some radius of turn to complete your instant turn! I can pick almost any small radius less than 410 feet and fudge your infinite G turn down to 88.7 degrees of bank and 44 Gs. Funny, you should study the dirt dumb paths you post before you post them and prove there are no rational pilots at p4t to check anything. If you prefer we can stick with your 90 degree bank turn, and infinite Gs. Which is it?


Terry Morin said parallel to the outer edge of the Annex, this means not over the Annex, but next to the annex on a path that hits the lampposts. Reading Morin's statement proves the "official flight path" is true due to the fact the FDR confirms the heading, and true course. But who uses real data at p4t? Not terrorist loyalist Balsamo who can't figure out how many feet are in a NM; or dMole who has to apologize for Balsamo.

 

[beachnut]

Nobody?

...

The CIT witnesses point to the "official path". Watch the truther supplied gif above as the witnesses point to the south path. They point to where 77 was really flying as it hit lamppost and hit the Pentagon.

Debunking CIT with their own stuff; good job SPreston. Where is your math?

 

[chillzero]

Couple of things for you all to bear in mind here.

1 - Keep it civil and don't keep getting personal with each other.

2 - Keep it on topic, and that means on topic to the forum and forum section, as well as the thread topic.

3 - Don't repeatedly spam large format photos that hve previously been posted. Please use links instead.

4 - Most importantly - be aware of the very fine line about posting on behalf of banned members. Do not replicate posts and discussion sections from other boards, and do not use this forum to hold one half of a conversation with other boards.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero

 

[WildCat]

Couple of things for you all to bear in mind here.

1 - Keep it civil and don't keep getting personal with each other.

2 - Keep it on topic, and that means on topic to the forum and forum section, as well as the thread topic.

3 - Don't repeatedly spam large format photos that hve previously been posted. Please use links instead.

4 - Most importantly - be aware of the very fine line about posting on behalf of banned members. Do not replicate posts and discussion sections from other boards, and do not use this forum to hold one half of a conversation with other boards.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero

It used to be when you quoted from a post that had a pic only the link to the pic would show up, not the pic. Has this changed, or is my memory off?