• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Phelps Organizing Protest of Obama's Grandmother's FUNERAL

Phelps' funeral will be the biggest party ever. I hope he dies soon.

Just watch, there'll be protesters at his funeral, and his family will be all "WAAAHH!!! What are they DOING?! Don't they know this is PRIVATE?! WAAAHH!!"

How sweet that will be....
 
Only a really bad person--like me--could hope that Phelps might be present, and reach for, say, a microphone that the Secret Service could mistake for a weapon...

I am always fascinated, watching the video of the Reagan shooting, at the way that f-in' machine guns materialize out of all these guys' suits. (Nice folding stocks, too.)

So, I know I'm really politically ignorant, but isn't Phelps into Yahweh being homophobic? And if so, why is he protesting an old lady's funeral?

Color me confused, MK
I just wanted to say two things. First, those weren't machine guns. They were assault rifles. The day you see a machine gun, you will know you've seen a machine gun. You will not confuse it with an assault rifle. You will not question if you've seen a machine gun. You will not ask what the difference is. You will say "wow. That's a gun." Then you will understand two things - one, why I said this. And two, why those things are NOT machine guns.

Second folding stock bullpups are still large, and it's a shock the Secret Service can draw them as fast as they do. They're very impressive people. And as much as me might like it, they wouldn't shoot Phelps by accident. Even if they wanted to, and even if he had a microphone. They're far too professional for that.
 
I like the thought of someone slipping a bag of apples and a salami into his luggage.

He'd be held up at Hawaiian customs for hours.....
 
:D

Actually, I think the old evil duffer was making a wordplay off the White House.

No he was refering to Malcolm X's speech about the House Negro and the Field Negro where the House Negro is in the system and still slave to the Whiteman.
 
No he was refering to Malcolm X's speech about the House Negro and the Field Negro where the House Negro is in the system and still slave to the Whiteman.

Amazingly enough, I knew that. Perhaps you could explain how al-Zawahiri could not possibly have been doing both.

ETA: Library Lady, of course you were. I'm sorry if I seemed to imply anything else.
 
Last edited:
Amazingly enough, I knew that.

Amazingly enough I don't read Democratic Underground.

Perhaps you could explain how al-Zawahiri could not possibly have been doing both.

I'm sure I could disprove the invisible elf in my backyard while I'm at it too, but the burden of proof isn't on me to show that he wasn't doing it, the burden is on those that claim he was.
 
Amazingly enough I don't read Democratic Underground.

Thank you for considering me an idiot and expressing that here on these pages. What would I ever do with my lately self-appointed Humility Squad to keep my radical raging leftist ego in check? :rolleyes:

I'm sure I could disprove the invisible elf in my backyard while I'm at it too, but the burden of proof isn't on me to show that he wasn't doing it, the burden is on those that claim he was.

It is of no concern to me if you believe it or not. I'm astounded you're arguing the point. Please believe what you want about the matter.
 
I agree. I don't know why people get so outraged at them? There are mainstream religious sects spreading real prejudice and bigotry all over the world. Sects that even run schools and have a significant political influence. They are the one's to be outraged at.

The Westboro' Baptist church is just a cartoon outfit and best ignored IMO.

Really? So, if your family is killed and a bunch of people are oustide the funeral telling everyone how great and deserved it is, you'll be more outraged at the sect down the street?
 
Phantom,

I could be wrong, but it looks like you think bolo was stating the same opinions on "house negro" were coming from the White House, like people living there at the moment felt this way. Bolo was refering to the "house" in "white house" being a wordplay by al-Zawahri. Kind of a light-hearted joke. If you are arguing over whether he was actually making the wordplay on purpose, check your humor chip.

Bolo,

Democratic Underground? C'moooooon.:D
 
Thank you for considering me an idiot and expressing that here on these pages. What would I ever do with my lately self-appointed Humility Squad to keep my radical raging leftist ego in check? :rolleyes:

Wow talk about reading things that aren't there. You posted that you already knew it and referenced to a site off JREF as if I should have read it before posting. I was pointing out I don't read that board so how was I supposed to know... sheeze... paranoid much?

It is of no concern to me if you believe it or not. I'm astounded you're arguing the point. Please believe what you want about the matter.

It's not about what I believe or not, it's about your claims and you not backing them up. If you were making a joke, fine, but you seem to be insisting that your believe is correct and that you know what al-Zawahri was meaning when he used the term. So far I have seen no evidence to back up that claim, and obviously you don't plan to back it up either.
 
Phantom,

I could be wrong, but it looks like you think bolo was stating the same opinions on "house negro" were coming from the White House, like people living there at the moment felt this way. Bolo was refering to the "house" in "white house" being a wordplay by al-Zawahri. Kind of a light-hearted joke. If you are arguing over whether he was actually making the wordplay on purpose, check your humor chip.

No, I'm saying that there is no evidence that al-Zawahri was using the term "house negro" in a double manner, both "Whiteman's slave" and "Whitehouse Negro". Boloboffin seems to be claiming that he did, but refuses to produce evidence. If it was a joke, then fine, but I'd have to ask why he responded as he did demanding I explain why al-Zawahri couldn't have been doing both. That indicates to me that that he was serious.
 
No, I'm saying that there is no evidence that al-Zawahri was using the term "house negro" in a double manner, both "Whiteman's slave" and "Whitehouse Negro". Boloboffin seems to be claiming that he did, but refuses to produce evidence. If it was a joke, then fine, but I'd have to ask why he responded as he did demanding I explain why al-Zawahri couldn't have been doing both. That indicates to me that that he was serious.

All that you require is at this link:

http://www.match.com

You're welcome.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom