Ed Pentagon - TruthMakesPeace

How much debris would you expect?
  • Volume (cubic meters or cubic feet)
  • Pile height (above foundations; remember the twin towers not only had 110 stories above ground, but also 5 basement levels below, that they collapsed into)

How much debris did you observe?
  • Volume (cubic meters or cubic feet)
  • Pile height (above foundations; remember the twin towers not only had 110 stories above ground, but also 5 basement levels below, that they collapsed into)

(I predict that CM has not the slightest idea of both expected and actual debris amounts)
I like your prediction, do you have a brochure? or perhaps a newsletter?
 
Are you suggesting basements cannot ever collapse or what?

Actually, it appears "The basement collapsed? ahahahhahahahahha" was the only thing he could come up with when he realized he had absolutely no answer to Oystein's post. I guess it's better than "duh" but still pretty lame.
 
.
No need to see it, we know it didn't.

BECAUSE CYANIDE DOESN'T KNOCK YOU OUT, IT KILLS YOU DEAD.

But do keep running from this teeny tiny flaw in your fantasy...
.
And given that hydrogen cyanide requires significant concentrations to kill, acts quite slowly and leaves distinctive traces, his claim is even more ludicrous than most twoofer nonsense............:boggled:
 
It's pretty fun training, I dominated the math questions but didn't do too well on the maze :(
Lt Dan claimed he didn't need oxygen. Put your mask on, Lt Dan... I'm a jock, I don't need oxygen.



The basement collapsed? ahahahhahahahahha
Do you try to be wrong, or are you a troll?
111subway911basementcollapsed.jpg

Oops, the basement collapsed, right into the Subway. Try some physics next time you will find the gravity collapse of the WTC towers released more energy than 250 2,000 pound bombs. Got physics?
 
The basement collapsed? ahahahhahahahahha

Do you have any evidence they did not?
Oh, and by the way, you forgot to answer the questions:

How much debris would you expect?
  • Volume (cubic meters or cubic feet)
  • Pile height (above foundations; remember the twin towers not only had 110 stories above ground, but also 5 basement levels below, that they collapsed into)

How much debris did you observe?
  • Volume (cubic meters or cubic feet)
  • Pile height (above foundations; remember the twin towers not only had 110 stories above ground, but also 5 basement levels below, that they collapsed into)

(I predict that CM has not the slightest idea of both expected and actual debris amounts)
 
And given that hydrogen cyanide requires significant concentrations to kill, acts quite slowly and leaves distinctive traces, his claim is even more ludicrous than most twoofer nonsense............:boggled:
.
Actually, 3200 mg/m3 is lethal to humans in roughly a minute, far too low a concentration and duration on a one-time application to leave much in the way of traces.
.
 
How much debris would you expect?
  • Volume (cubic meters or cubic feet)
  • Pile height (above foundations; remember the twin towers not only had 110 stories above ground, but also 5 basement levels below, that they collapsed into)

How much debris did you observe?
  • Volume (cubic meters or cubic feet)
  • Pile height (above foundations; remember the twin towers not only had 110 stories above ground, but also 5 basement levels below, that they collapsed into)

(I predict that CM has not the slightest idea of both expected and actual debris amounts)

Let's see, 110 story building 90%* air then 110 * .1 = 11 stories left after collapse. Since there were 5 stories of underground we would expect approx six stories of debris above ground and that's what we see.

*by memory
 
Last edited:
Does that look like 110 stories of debris?
Goal shifting. You said "pulvierized to dust". The statement clearly implied that you were implying everything was turned to dust, not just some of it. If you were unclear, that is your problem, not mine.
 
Actually, it appears "The basement collapsed? ahahahhahahahahha" was the only thing he could come up with when he realized he had absolutely no answer to Oystein's post. I guess it's better than "duh" but still pretty lame.
This is Clayton. Whenever there's something he can't address, he mocks it. I suspect that, psychologically, something he can't answer instantly becomes mockworthy. Because if he can't understand it, it must be silly.
 
bumpie bump for Cicorp... You ran away...

Ah yes... here is the technical analysis.

Cicorp... I believe you will need to admit that you are wrong (again), then then you can admit that you slandered the SEC investigators, the FBI and others in your baseless claims.

http://www.911myths.com/images/5/5b/Remote_Takeover.pdf

Can you do even basic research? Start at about page 20... hell read the whole *********** thing. Then try to put it into your tiny head that you are WRONG again.

When will you examine the technical report which destroys your bs claims?
Just like your inability with the PUT orders or the SEC.
Tsk tsk tsk.
 
AOIRCPCEHBCE theory hypothesizes asphyxiation, removal of air

And given that hydrogen cyanide requires significant concentrations to kill, acts quite slowly and leaves distinctive traces,
That is a good point. The AOIRCPCEHBCE theory proposes, not gas, but Depressurization as the primary hypothesis. Gassing is only an "alternate hypothesis (too complicated)". Air was removed from the fuselage, rendering everyone unconscious.
www.Pentagon.org
Asphyxiated (Depressurized or Gassed)
Occupants (Crew, Passengers and duped Hijackers)
In Remote Controlled Planes Containing Explosives
Hitting Buildings Containing Explosives (AOIRCPCEHBCE)
 
That is a good point. The AOIRCPCEHBCE theory proposes, not gas, but Depressurization as the primary hypothesis. Gassing is only an "alternate hypothesis (too complicated)". Air was removed from the fuselage, rendering everyone unconscious.
www.Pentagon.org
Asphyxiated (Depressurized or Gassed)
Occupants (Crew, Passengers and duped Hijackers)
In Remote Controlled Planes Containing Explosives
Hitting Buildings Containing Explosives (AOIRCPCEHBCE)

Woo hoo.

Ah yes... here is the technical analysis.

Cicorp... I believe you will need to admit that you are wrong (again), then then you can admit that you slandered the SEC investigators, the FBI and others in your baseless claims.

http://www.911myths.com/images/5/5b/Remote_Takeover.pdf

Can you do even basic research? Start at about page 20... hell read the whole *********** thing. Then try to put it into your tiny head that you are WRONG again.
 
AOIRCPCEHBCE theory?

:rolleyes:

Note: Acronyms are mostly used to make things easier to remember. You guy's can't get anything right.
 

Back
Top Bottom