• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ed Pentagon - TruthMakesPeace

Regardless of who funds it, the Commission must have subpoena powers to get to all the evidence it requests.
Everyone, even Bush & Cheney, should testify separately, publicly, and under oath.

This is my favorite part. The "perps" are so evil that they had no trouble pulling off the most vial and despicable crimes yet, they will roll because of a subpoena and the fact they're "under oath".

This is almost on par with "independent" an "subpoena power". Who exactly is going to enforce this?

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
15 cents per Tax Payer for a New 9/11 Commission

independent of tax dollars.
Tax pennies, is more like it.
In 2005 there were about 100,000,000 Americans who paid taxes.

If each Tax Payer paid 15 cents, that would be $15 million,
about as much as the Zelikow-Kean-Hamilton Commission eventually got.

Initially it got $3 million, about 3 cents per tax payer, or

Zero per tax payer, if the money was "printed" by the Federal Reserve.
 
Last edited:
Tax pennies, is more like it.
In 2005 there were about 100,000,000 Americans who paid taxes.

If each Tax Payer paid 15 cents, that would be $15 million,
about as much as the Zelikow-Kean-Hamilton Commission got.
That's OK. I gave to NIST and the FBI.


:rolleyes:
 
Tax pennies, is more like it.
In 2005 there were about 100,000,000 Americans who paid taxes.

If each Tax Payer paid 15 cents, that would be $15 million,
about as much as the Zelikow-Kean-Hamilton Commission eventually got.

Initially it got $3 million, about 3 cents per tax payer.

Please refer to post #132 and give me your thoughts.

Please.
 
Would the truthers accept another investigation anyway? I seriously doubt it. Not a government one, or an independent one agreeing with the official account.
 
Would the truthers accept another investigation anyway? I seriously doubt it. Not a government one, or an independent one agreeing with the official account.

There's no way they would.

Remember - the magic is in them getting subpoena power to get the government documents and evidence.

When the (tee hee hee) "independent" investigation is complete and once again proves them wrong, they'll have an out because the evidence was collected from Government Sources. It'll be no good.

This is why the truth movement has been proven to be for anything BUT truth.
 
Would the truthers accept another investigation anyway? I seriously doubt it. Not a government one, or an independent one agreeing with the official account.
The "independent investigation" is their out. They can always fall back on the fact they can't get it and ignore it if they do (like they have already).

Perfect if you're trying to keep a belief alive. You don't need to provide evidence because you need an investigation to get it (naturally you ignore the ones that have been done).
 
Tax pennies, is more like it.
In 2005 there were about 100,000,000 Americans who paid taxes.

If each Tax Payer paid 15 cents, that would be $15 million,
about as much as the Zelikow-Kean-Hamilton Commission eventually got.

Initially it got $3 million, about 3 cents per tax payer, or

Zero per tax payer, if the money was "printed" by the Federal Reserve.
Richard Gage started a petition to get one started. Any idea why he has not submitted it?
 
The "independent investigation" is their out. They can always fall back on the fact they can't get it and ignore it if they do (like they have already).

Perfect if you're trying to keep a belief alive. You don't need to provide evidence because you need an investigation to get it (naturally you ignore the ones that have been done).

Exactly, they can't pull the plug on their life support machine. They simply have to keep it alive so they'll just keep picking and picking like a scab you can't leave alone.


Anneliese
 
Have faith. I enjoy posting on JREF, with its freedom of speech and quick responses, without the message that http://911Blogger.com gives:

"The post has been submitted for moderation and won't be listed publicly until it has been approved."

:rolleyes:

Translation: We refuse to admit we might be wrong about something, we're too narrow minded to listen to something we don't agree with and we have a complete double standard when it comes to free speech.
 
Have faith. I enjoy posting on JREF, with its freedom of speech and quick responses, without the message that http://911Blogger.com gives:
"The post has been submitted for moderation and won't be listed publicly until it has been approved."
Some blog. :rolleyes:
Posting false information is allowed, 911 truth does it freely without hesitation, no critical thinking needed to post lies, hearsay, and misinformation. Figured out RADAR yet?
 
You begin with an Unwarranted Assumption. I am very willing to start a new thread, and am glad you did it first. I am not trying to derail anything, and just answer posts much as time permits, where they come in. I'm not Aldo. Do you take back your Unwarranted Assumptions and Accusations?

My assumptions were based on the fact that several people had , over several posts, told you to start new threads and yet you did not. If your continued inaction on that was for any other reason than being 'unwilling' then I aplogize.

My quip about you being Aldo a wild guess I admit but Gee you seem to have done a lot of the things that the CiT have already said they did. So if you are not Aldo or Craig you sure wanna be em' or meet em' it would appear.
 
You folks sure are dedicated to getting to the truth. I made a few posts, came back after dinner, and there is a new thread named after me, with 2 pages already. Plus I'm accused of not showing up.

yep things move fast here.
For instance I started the thread that was requested and have been away for a few days(BTW I'll be away for a few more after today) and looky here,,,, 4 pages.

The Pentagon is the biggest mystery to me, and the closest 9/11 site to home. I see strong evidence for several theories, but am not taking sides yet. There may be a theory no one has thought of yet, that explains everything. That's why I'm at JREF, to get more information and discuss ideas.

Well you may have not chosen sides yet but you sure are falling for some rather obvious fantasies that the Pentagon no-planer cadre promotes.

Yes, CE, Craig, Aldo et al, the CiT contention is a no-planer since they contend that no plane hit the building. This is just as fallacious as Judy Wood and Morgan reynolds with their faked planes at the WTC.
 

Back
Top Bottom