The Right thinks of everything in terms of race, and so they honestly can't imagine that we don't.
Wow, are you just kidding or serious?
The Right thinks of everything in terms of race, and so they honestly can't imagine that we don't.
Cain Confident He Can Win Nomination, Says Harassment Claims Are 'Baseless' — PBS Newshour
Herman Cain: My China strategy is quite simply outgrow China. It gets back to economics. China has a $6 trillion economy and they're growing at approximately 10 percent. We have a $14 trillion economy -- much bigger -- but we're growing at an anemic 1.5, 1.6 percent. When we get our economy growing back at the rate of 5 or 6 percent that it has the ability to do, we will outgrow China.
.gif)
I particularly enjoy this part:
It was a joke to the extent in the context of the views of that speech,
Cain said:she ended up leaving with several months severance, which would have been what she would have left with if we had involuntarily dismissed her. I don't know if it was three months, whether it was two months, it might have been six months.
NY Times said:The National Restaurant Association gave $35,000 — a year’s salary — in severance pay to a female staff member ... three people with direct knowledge of the payment said on Tuesday. link
Cain was given 10 days to respond to questions about the matter before it was made public.
And speaking of the Cain sense of humor. . in 2006, he wrote a column suggesting that the GOP begin grooming (pre-scandal) Tiger Woods for a run at the presidency in 2016.
Now he claims that was just a joke too.
I find that so very difficult to swallow since we've had the likes of Trump reported as leading the polls in this race, proving that there is no candidate so absurd that parody is self-evident.
Please, take a moment to read this column and tell me if you think it was meant to be comedy, or if it wasn't straight-up sincere.
http://economicfreedomcoalition.com/news/press-opinion-121306.asp
It would be different if Cain had said simply that he was writing about a person who he thought had the traits he spoke of in the article. Since the sex-scandals have come to light, he respectfully retracts his suggestion.
Tiger's success on the golf course, which will translate to success in the White House, is a product of his character, discipline and leadership by example.

Any chance Cain had at winning the nomination is gone. It's over for him. He wasn't even a good liar on this one. On TV he said he didn't know if the National Restaurant Association settled with the people who claimed harassment even though he he was the freaking CEO of the National Restaurant Association.
I would also be shocked if this harassment news wasn't leaked by the Romney or Perry campaigns. I don't think the democrats have any real incentive to ruin his chances at getting the nomination as he would be a dream candidate for them (because he has no chance).
Just to save you from having to "go back and look up the history" the Washington Post Fact Checker does it for you:
I'm not too sure that he's a goner for the nomination, personally. He is still doing pretty good in many GOP polls, and he remains quite the darling of the Tea Party fringe.
Of course, the GOP political wonks are probably pissing themselves in fear that he might win the nomination, in which case he would simply be crushed in the general election.
I have wondered this myself. Though I have to say that if the Romney campaign leaked the news, then they may have miscalculated on the fanaticism of the Tea Party, anybody-but-Romney crowd within the GOP. My guess is this sort of thing is simply going to make those folks become more supportive of Cain.
Cain's "jokes" are less funny than Coulter's.
They had the Politico guy on Diane Rehm yesterday. They approached the Cain campaign 10 days before confronting him....To no response whatever.
When confronted, Cain flubbed with a textbook "how to flub a controversy" series of denials, deflections, and blame-shifting.
A hilarious show if the man was not a possibility for the Oval Office.
CBS’s “Face the Nation,” October 30, 2011:
Bob Schieffer: OK. I want to ask you, since we're on the subject of abortion, there was, at one point back there when the question of Planned Parenthood came up, and you said that it was not Planned Parenthood, it was really planned genocide because you said Planned Parenthood was trying to put all these centers into the black communities because they wanted to kill black babies --
Herman Cain : Yes.
Scheiffer: -- before they were born. Do you still stand by that?
Cain: I still stand by that.
Schieffer: Do you have any proof that that was the objective of Planned Parenthood?
Cain: If people go back and look at the history and look at Margaret Sanger's own words, that's exactly where that came from. Look up the history. So if you go back and look up the history -- secondly, look at where most of them were built; 75 percent of those facilities were built in the black community -- and Margaret Sanger's own words, she didn't use the word "genocide," but she did talk about preventing the increasing number of poor blacks in this country by preventing black babies from being born.
Just to save you from having to "go back and look up the history" the Washington Post Fact Checker does it for you:
No matter what you think of abortion, it seems pretty clear that Cain is spouting historical fiction. There is no evidence that Sanger ever sought to kill black babies, either through the Negro Project or any other endeavor. Cain’s claim that three-quarters of Planned Parenthood’s facilities are in black neighborhoods also appears wildly exaggerated.
-Bri
Now one of his accusers is considering going public. If she does, Cain is toast.
Cain isn't in a position to release her; it has to come from the organization. Cain has been asked to ask the organization, to which he replied with some Cain-esque mumbo jumbo.She's asking Cain to release her from her gag order. This kind of puts him in a tight spot. If he refuses, it looks like he's hiding something.
This issue is not what happened 20 years ago, it's about how he's reacted in the last week as documented in this thread. Ignorance and lies, or maybe just all lies. Like many issues with politicians, it's more about them covering up then about what they are trying to hide.
We are in agreement on this point. Surely he must have suspected this would
surface and should have known what he was going to say. The fact that he wasn't prepared and waddled around with his answers is certainly troubling.
In an interview Monday, Cain said part of China's threat to the United States stems from its attempts to develop nuclear weapons