OK, so how do thermite demolitions work again?

Chodorov said:
Right. Iron was what the witnesses said. Iron was the constituency of the spheres found. No evidence for aluminium. No possibility of it being aluminium on the basis of the Arabs alone theory.
Click to expand...
Just for giggles.

Why do you think you can't get people to take you seriously?
 
So its really a case of you guys wanting the molten iron and the iron spheres to go away. Do I have that right? But even here you see you've atomised the evidence. None of the official story holds up. Its not just about iron in all three basements. But your theory has to explain the iron in all three basements AND EVERYTHING ELSE or it must be sent to the fires.
 
Chodorov said:
Right. Thermate AND multiple rigged explosions. I know it can be hard for an Arabs alone theorist to read sometimes. There is of course the possibility of black projects weaponry. But black projects weaponry cannot be the whole story since any theory must be able to explain the multiple rigged explosions.
Click to expand...

Have you read any of the replies?
 
Chodorov said:
No I picked that up. Scroll back. You will see I picked that up and edited it. You see we are only interested in 9/11. Not in some sort of party trick distraction that you've concocted.
Click to expand...

You picked it up because I told you.

Its not changing the subject, I am showing you this because people use the word explosion and blast and even bomb to NOT REFER TO BOMBS.

So saying people heard explosions on 911 is meaningless.
 
uke2se said:
Yes, it is. If you want to make another argument, you need to try harder.
Click to expand...


So do you have an explanation for the iron in all three basements. Or are you just going to wish it away like some mega-woo character. Bending spoons in your spare time?
 
Chodorov said:
So its really a case of you guys wanting the molten iron and the iron spheres to go away. Do I have that right? But even here you see you've atomised the evidence. None of the official story holds up. Its not just about iron in all three basements. But your theory has to explain the iron in all three basements AND EVERYTHING ELSE or it must be sent to the fires.
Click to expand...

A graduate of the "LALALALALALAI'MNOTLISTENING" school of debate I see.
 
Chodorov said:
So do you have an explanation for the iron in all three basements.
Click to expand...

Do you have any evidence for the iron in all three basements? Real evidence, that is?

Note, the evidence must show that the iron was there, that it was molten and that it was iron.
 
Edx said:
You picked it up because I told you.

I
Click to expand...

No I picked it up before you told me. But thats not relevant. You haven't made a logical argument. It was just another distraction on your part and therefore an act of faith-based make-believe.
 
uke2se said:
Do you have any evidence for the iron in all three basements? Real evidence, that is?

Note, the evidence must show that the iron was there, that it was molten and that it was iron.
Click to expand...

Witness evidence. Any theory that said it was aluminium, would also have to account for aluminium being there, and in all three basements.
 
Chodorov said:
No I picked it up before you told me. But thats not relevant. You haven't made a logical argument. It was just another distraction on your part and therefore an act of faith-based make-believe.
Click to expand...

Why did you ignore the rest of my post?

I just showed you several cases where people referred to explosions, blasts and bombs but they had nothing to do with explosives.

So saying people heard explosions on 911, is meaningless. You have not responded to this.
 
Chodorov said:
Witness evidence. Any theory that said it was aluminium, would also have to account for aluminium being there, and in all three basements.
Click to expand...

Provide said witness evidence.

Did you know that there is witness evidence for bigfoot, UFOs, ghosts, magic and the abominable snowman?
 
Something curious here. Is this plausible deniability? Don't you people think you ought to review the evidence yourself before presuming to be experts on this matter. I mean if you are wondering about the molten iron ten years on thats being pretty disciplined denialists ten years on isn't it.

If you don't look at it it will go away right? Whereas people who wish to know the truth have vivid memories of molten iron dripping from one of the buildings even before the building collapsed.
 
uke2se said:
Provide said witness evidence.

Did you know that there is witness evidence for bigfoot, UFOs, ghosts, magic and the abominable snowman?
Click to expand...

So its ten years on and you haven't checked the evidence out yourself? Why are you discussing this matter? So for example you have not seen the molten iron dripping from one of the buildings prior to it collapsing? Just for example?
 
So now the Arabs-alone theorists have decided that if they do not look at the evidence ever, they won't have to believe the implications of it.

We all have the same internet. You can all track down the exact same evidence as quickly as I can.
 
Chodorov said:
Don't you people think you ought to review the evidence yourself before presuming to be experts on this matter.
Click to expand...

1. Do you think you are an expert on this matter?
2. Do you think none of us have reviewed the evidence?

Chodorov said:
I mean if you are wondering about the molten iron ten years on thats being pretty disciplined denialists ten years on isn't it.
Click to expand...

Nobody has been able to provide sufficient evidence that it was there or that it was molten iron. Do you want to be the first?

Chodorov said:
If you don't look at it it will go away right?
Click to expand...

Denialism is your strong-point. Not ours.

Chodorov said:
Whereas people who wish to know the truth have vivid memories of molten iron dripping from one of the buildings even before the building collapsed.
Click to expand...

I have vivid memories of sleeping with Jessica Alba. It happened in a dream.
 
Chodorov said:
Something curious here. Is this plausible deniability? Don't you people think you ought to review the evidence yourself before presuming to be experts on this matter. I mean if you are wondering about the molten iron ten years on thats being pretty disciplined denialists ten years on isn't it.

If you don't look at it it will go away right? Whereas people who wish to know the truth have vivid memories of molten iron dripping from one of the buildings even before the building collapsed.
Click to expand...

You keep talking about molten iron, you have yet to provide any evidence of it.

:rolleyes:
 
uke2se said:
Provide said witness evidence.
Click to expand...

Why? You are looking at the same internet as I am. If you will not look at the evidence there is no point in me wasting time finding stuff that you can more easily find yourself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom