October Stundie Nominations

Fair enough, I hang here because I find it entertaining. Unlike Prison Planet though, here I occasionally learn something useful. Read some of Dave Roger's posts, for example.

Hokulele, my Official Nemesis, I mean you no disrespect. I just get frustrated when people act as though my claims are completely made-up, even though I have offered a supporting argument with cited sources. Then, I get mocked for supporting my argument.

I think JREF is great. It has helped me dispel quite a few of my of misconceptions, and really forced me to reconsider the "evidence" I use to make judgments. I just find a very different culture here. The crazies welcome me with open arms; I find most JREFers a bit hostile and rude.

A little sugar helps the medicine go down. Sorry to interrupt the nominations.
 
This reads like sarcasm. I wonder if you realize why that quote was nominated in the first place?

It's this bit: "...building could be designed to prevent airplane impact..."


How does one design a building to prevent airplane impact?

Personally, I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you meant to say "prevent collapse from airplane impact".
That's what the rest of your posts seems to imply was your point.

In which case, it's a typo (or missed word), and as such I don't think it qualifies for the Stundies. But then, I don't make the decisions on such things.


Had you read through to #127, you'd see you were exactly right. Still, the fact that you were able to see that it was a simple ambiguous use of pronoun, does not mean it would not generate the "well crafted" jokes that followed it and are sure to follow its nomination and hopefully, the taking home of the grand prize.

Let's keep our fingers crossed, it's truly a stundoozy.
 
I'd like to nominate the various bolded portions of this exchange by MChapmann:

Who searched wtc7 debris for bombs?

Who searched wtc7 for pink elephant crap?

Your mind works in very sad ways. There were no bombs found. You seem to think there were...prove it.

No. I know no bombs were found. They couldnt have been found because you just admitted they werent searched for. Thanks for making my case.

Well hell, Chapman, if someone had heard the unfreakingmistakeable sound of CD, I can pretty god damn gar-an-tee that they would have searched the god damn debris for demolition charges, but given the fact that only nitwit Troothers believe in hush-a-boom brand silent explosives, there did not seem to be a whole hell of a lot of reason to look for it, now did there?

You don't believe in silent explosives, do ya Chapman? Of course not.

So you admit no searches were made for explosives.

Why is markyx claiming that lack of explosive residue is evidence that there was no cd ? You admit yourself no searches were done.

So you admit that there were no sounds of CD. Oh look at me, I am ducking the question.

I mean, you are not telling the people here that there are hush-a-boom brand farking explosives, now are ya, Chapman?

C'mon Chapman, stay on topic here.

Yes or No, should they have been looking for silent explosives? C'mon Chapman, I'll flat farking admit that no one ever searched for silent explosives, Chapman, you saying they should have?

Yes or No? Hush-a-boom there Chapman??

You are claiming the collapse of 7 was silent?

Several people heard booms. One described it as a clap of thunder.

Yeah it made sounds as is was collapsing. That is a no-brainer. For it to be a CD, there would be charges going off before it started collapsing. They would be very loud and unmistakable.

There would be loud noises before it started collapsing if there werent bombs. I'm sure NIST arent going to claim that column 79's failure was a quiet affair.

I thought debunkers said that all kinds of things could be mistaken for explosives ie elevators falling, generators blowing etc, yet you claim explosives would be unmistakable.

First, he seems to be claiming that it's impossible to see or find anything unless you're looking specifically for that thing. It does make one wonder, though, how we come up with these eyewitnesses to unprecedented events like 9/11. (I'm giving him a pass on the "because you just admitted" part, in the hopes that it's just poor grammar, and he doesn't actually believe that things written on the internet in 2008 have any effect on actual events in the past)

Later on, in consecutive posts, he's trying to rebut a question as to the lack of sound produced by explosive charges by saying that people did hear loud noises . . . and then asserting that there would still be loud noises even if there weren't any explosives.

ETA: He's still on that first kick this morning:

So you can provide proof that explosive residue was searched for in wtc7 debris?

If not, then your point makes no sense. It cant be found if it isnt looked for, so you cannot claim there was no explosive residue there.
 
Last edited:
A bit of sugar helps the medicine come up again?
that could be true, when i was 8 i had to take these pills that were supposed to be chocolate flavored but they were the grossest things ever, and a fair amount of them did come back, lol
 
that could be true, when i was 8 i had to take these pills that were supposed to be chocolate flavored but they were the grossest things ever, and a fair amount of them did come back, lol

Ahh, yes, to a child Bakers Chocolate should taste better than regular chocolate. How wrong the child always is.
 
ULTIMA1 stretches lunacy just a bit further.

You really should do some research, the planes did not do that much damage to the building. According to a few engineers.


ETA: I should clarify something, although the thread this post is linked from concerns WTC7, the topic had drifted to the North Tower, and that is the context in which this post should be read.
 
Last edited:
This was made by a poster on another forum I visit. vamp_guy_666, the most original name ever, gives us a cold hard dose of the truth but can't inform us of just how true it is.


okay for one yes that may be true i have a hidden video which no one can see and technically really shouldn't kno about but it's the truth the truth about evrything the government you name it's their it was made by hackers we rent this land from England that's where are taxes go to also in 2010 that is when we are supposedly going to try to take over this whole county and get our troops back and in the year 2010 well guess who might be president Obama Trauma as i call him **** voting i don't vote even though i can legally vote i'm choosing not 2 for personally reasons.. you can basically say i live my life in total Anarchy because of the truth i live like as seen in my eyes ABOVE ALL i hate the government the authority i hate them all. but anyways i fear the truth will soon be happening if Obama is elected President just because he's a ******* ****** yeah i said it. i have nothing wrong with the black community only OBAMA. with that established i think ALL HOPE IS GONE and i wish you guys the best of luck and sorry dude but i think your family is just a bit ****** up in the head sorry for talking about your family in a negative way i just always speak my mind. thanx everyone for listening to me rant and rave about this topic

I can't link to the post, because the forum owner doesn't want anyone linking to the forums. It's private and requires approved membership anyways so you couldn't see the comment if I did link it. Instead I got a screenshot, if that's not ok then I will gladly withdraw my submission.

Also, keep in mind the screenshot features the post uncensored so it's NSFW due to language.

Screenshot
 
"you can basically say i live my life in total Anarchy because of the truth i live like as seen in my eyes ABOVE ALL i hate the government the authority i hate them all."

Wow. There's a well adjusted totally sane person.
 
It should have bounced I tell ya!

If a solid rubber ball bounces on solid ground (not preposterous), why would not a solid, rigid upper block/section do the same when contacting/impacting a solid, rigid lower structure? Don't the same laws of physics that you describe apply in both cases?

Thanks for not calling me a lier.

BTW - what about NIST forgetting to analyze all possible developments after an alleged impact! Professional? Incompetent?
 
And a very worthy effort from Henry Makow. In a rant full of amusing hysteria, this bit stood out as special.

Barrack Obama is pictured above giving the Illuminati sign of Baphomet. Yes, technically the thumb should be folded in, and his excuse is that it is the American Sign Language “I Love You.” Just like Bush who pretended this was the Texas Longhorn sign, these Satanists need a cover story. Have you ever wondered why the ASL signal is so similar to the sign of Satan? ASL was financed by the Rockefellers and devised by Helen Keller, a theosophist i.e. Mason.​
 
And a very worthy effort from Henry Makow. In a rant full of amusing hysteria, this bit stood out as special.

Barrack Obama is pictured above giving the Illuminati sign of Baphomet. Yes, technically the thumb should be folded in, and his excuse is that it is the American Sign Language “I Love You.” Just like Bush who pretended this was the Texas Longhorn sign, these Satanists need a cover story. Have you ever wondered why the ASL signal is so similar to the sign of Satan? ASL was financed by the Rockefellers and devised by Helen Keller, a theosophist i.e. Mason.​

I live just 70 miles from Austin, Texas, and can tell you that people from the University of Texas truly are the spawn of Satan. :p
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom