October Stundie Nominations

[TriskettheKid]

Man, talk about arrogance.

DementedOompaLoompa on "faked" footage and what it means:

And I don't know why eyewitnesses mistook it for a plane. For all I know, planes really did hit the buildings, but the government still edited the videos to send conspiracy theorists down the wrong path. The fact is, those videos are edited. You can draw any conclusion from it you want, but if it doesn't involve a corrupt government and media than they've already won.

Source:
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/genmessage.php?board=214&topic=45716737&page=2

I really wonder what triggers these delusions. Some kind of massive superiority complex?

 

[Travis]

Man, talk about arrogance.

DementedOompaLoompa on "faked" footage and what it means:



Source:
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/genmessage.php?board=214&topic=45716737&page=2

I really wonder what triggers these delusions. Some kind of massive superiority complex?

I'm thinking overcompensation for an "inferiority" complex.

 

[Minadin]

I'll nominate this:

Pentagon airspace is not restricted? Wow...good one.

A slow turn in restricted air space. Exposed for more time. Why not hit
the Pentagon directly like shown by PFT? How dumb are these terrorists?
YOu crack me up.

Besides the other problems with his post - TF has apparently not heard of Reagan National Airport. Check out how one of the runways is pointing almost directly at the Pentagon.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

I'll nominate this:



Besides the other problems with his post - TF has apparently not heard of Reagan National Airport. Check out how one of the runways is pointing almost directly at the Pentagon.

Using satellite view shows it better.

 

[Travis]

I'm waiting for someone to say Google Earth is disinfo.

 

[Alareth]

Anybody need some more iron in their diet?

I know it probably won't be a finalist, but I could pass up showing the extreme irony of DementedOompaLoompa's post:



Source:
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/genmessage.php?board=214&topic=45716737&page=3

WOW ...

Head Asplode

 

[Mel Odious]

Maybe not a finalist, but had me laughing just the same:

I wonder how someone could have gotten this shot without being notified ahead of time:

Seems obvious.

ok, got your point. But the plane being so close to the building....you would have to have your camera focused on that 2nd building for several minutes, right after the first building was 'attacked'......and then, take your snapshot just as the plane "hits" the building.

(the photograph in question shows flight 175 about to hit WTC2, with smoke from WTC1 billowing in the background)

(See post #1 and #3 in the linked thread)

 

[applecorped]

But it was just getting good.



Yikes. That boy has some issues.

I'm tempted to nominate you for this as it was nowhere in the vicinity of getting good. It wasn't even getting bad, it was clawing its way to miserable but petered out at the epic fail level.

 

[Travis]

Maybe not a finalist, but had me laughing just the same:



(See post #1 and #3 in the linked thread)

The Icke forums are a treasure trove of idiocy.

 

[Horatius]

The Icke forums are a treasure trove of idiocy.

I question the use of "treasure" in that sentence.

 

[Travis]

I question the use of "treasure" in that sentence.

How about "amply filled depository" of idiocy?

 

[Mel Odious]

The Icke forums are a treasure trove of idiocy.

And of some absolutely reprehensible statements as well. I refuse to cut and paste the comment here, but take a look at post #15 from the same thread I linked to earlier. It's a real jaw-dropper.

 

[Mel Odious]

From 911movement.org

Considering the amount of digital manipulation in all the 911 footage that has been available to us. What are the possibilities of the actual plane impacts on the towers, the actual plane outline, the hole, being an actual fake. A digital fake, a photoshop fake. Do we have photographs of the towers with the plane outline? I think I have seen all the footage of the plane outlines before. That has been available to the public. It is no a that much footage, considering the event. However there is the possibility that people out there still have photographs and video that they have not handed in or camera planet has them stockpiled for later enslavement.

That i think is higly unlikely.

The only other possibility is expolsives that blew up to make the plane outline, that seems extreme to me, but video evidence has suggested this.

(etc.)

 

[Travis]

And of some absolutely reprehensible statements as well. I refuse to cut and paste the comment here, but take a look at post #15 from the same thread I linked to earlier. It's a real jaw-dropper.

Then allow me.

How many millions of dollars did they get for loosing loved ones? I can't remember the figures anymore, but IIRC it was a tidy sum, so much so that one woman even made up a dead realative.

I feel dirty just having read it.

 

[PhantomWolf]

NORADs mission objective apparently aren't all listed in their missions statement, well according to ULTIMA1 anyway:

I mean its NORADs job to shoot down planes off course and do not repsond.

 

[Travis]

NORADs mission objective apparently aren't all listed in their missions statement, well according to ULTIMA1 anyway:

I mean its NORADs job to shoot down planes off course and do not repsond.

I swear, Truthers should never be given responsibility for any task more complicated than watching a pet rock collection.......provided the pet rocks are encapsulated in a soft non-poisonous rubber first.

 

[Dave Rogers]

The ultimate no-claimer claim from Ultima1: there have been no accusations from the truth movement?

Where has anyone accused anyone of "being in on it" ?

Right, we've never seen wild accusations from truthers. Couldn't happen.

Dave

 

[DC]

I swear, Truthers should never be given responsibility for any task more complicated than watching a pet rock collection.......provided the pet rocks are encapsulated in a soft non-poisonous rubber first.

oh then I hope you do not drink Nescafé, just finished a new Machine for them

 

[Horatius]

How about "amply filled depository" of idiocy?

Much better!

 

[Dave Rogers]

Wow, ULTIMA1 is really making a run for the title this month. He's claiming that only the engines were strong enough to penetrate the WTC Towers and the Pentagon. Here's his stunning argument as to why the landing gear wouldn't have done so too:

But the landing gear were up inside the plane at the towers and only 1 witness stated they were lowered at the Pentagon.

There you are, folks; if the landing gear's retracted, it doesn't exist!

Dave