• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Obama has pushed the "white man" too far

What do you consider an "anti-white feeling"? Where has the Democrat party considered or thought of introducing some kind of anti-white legislation? What does that even mean? (Repeal the Civil Rights Act for whites?) What counts as "anti-white" to you? Especially considering the Democrat party is mostly white too.

It seems that what most who complain about "anti-white X" are really complaining about things designed to give disadvantaged groups of Color a helping hand, not things intended to create disadvantage for whites.

It sounds like this argument is the Dems aren't anti-white, they are just pro-everyone else. That sounds very much like discrimination to me. Also, this "white privilege" nonsense isn't coming from Republicans, and I think it is a very anti-white, racist undertaking indeed.
 
They killed Jesus.

Of course, there weren't really very many Christians around at that time, mostly Romans and/or Jews in the neighborhood. And you know how God is if you don't do what he wants. So someone had to...

As pointed out already, it is interesting that the idea that the Jews killed Jesus was used to drive much of anti-Semitism historically, but its proponents somehow ignored the fact the Jesus was Jewish. Not to mention the fact I am not my ancestors, who were nowhere near Jerusalem at the time. And that he didn't stay dead.
 
It sounds like this argument is the Dems aren't anti-white, they are just pro-everyone else. That sounds very much like discrimination to me. Also, this "white privilege" nonsense isn't coming from Republicans, and I think it is a very anti-white, racist undertaking indeed.

I am not exactly certain what your point is here.

But I believe that the argument isn't that the Democrats are pro-everyone else; just pro-everyone (including "whites"). So isn't that the opposite of racism? Could you name a policy by the Dems which is expressly anti-white?


And of course the Republicans would not officially state that they are the "white privilege" party. It just happens to coincide with many of their policies.
 
It sounds like this argument is the Dems aren't anti-white, they are just pro-everyone else. That sounds very much like discrimination to me. Also, this "white privilege" nonsense isn't coming from Republicans, and I think it is a very anti-white, racist undertaking indeed.

No. Progressives are pro-equality. Also, white privilege is a real thing that is starting to lose power and that scares Conservatives.
 
A question: being a white 49 year old male, am I squandering my white privilege by working two jobs, six days a week?

Michael
 
A question: being a white 49 year old male, am I squandering my white privilege by working two jobs, six days a week?

Michael

Mr. Bigot would say, "the government steals your earnings to pay for those people. If we just cut all those entitlement programs, then your taxes would be low enough that you could work less."

If you have never encountered Mr. Bigot face to face, then consider yourself lucky.
 
Last edited:
only on his mother's side.


[i am just keeping with the spirit of the thread]

Good point! But that should have been enough to make Jesus Jewish, as almost all rabbis see it.

The real question is: what religion was his father? He must have believed in God, although there is evidence in the 10 Commandments that He may have believed in more than one. A poly-Theist? A Pan-Theist? An Auto-Theist? This is a puzzlement.
 
Again, where is your evidence


Let's start with the POTUS and Al Sharpton, who has made a name for himself trying to railroad innocent white people into criminal convictions, and has done so without criticism from any prominent Dems. He has visited the White House over 60 times in the last six years, and often does photo-ops with Eric Holder and Obama. When white people see Al Sharpton welcomed with open arms in Washington, they know where they stand with the Democrats.
 
Let's start with the POTUS and Al Sharpton, who has made a name for himself trying to railroad innocent white people into criminal convictions, and has done so without criticism from any prominent Dems. He has visited the White House over 60 times in the last six years, and often does photo-ops with Eric Holder and Obama. When white people see Al Sharpton welcomed with open arms in Washington, they know where they stand with the Democrats.
What you just stated is not evidence of your claim. But it's now become clear where you are coming from. Thanks.
 
It's not like he stayed dead. :D
And that's the thing that has never squared in my regimented gray glob. The whole idea is that he had to die, as well as knew he was going to. Whoever (or whatever general group) did the deed was enabling destiny and, if I've got this straight, assisting in the salvation of mankind.

So, I would think it'd be: Yay, Jews!
 
Last December the Washington Post fact-checked Rudy Giuliani's claim that Al Sharpton had visited the White House 80 or 85 times. The number they arrived at was 72, but many of those were for various events attended by large numbers of people. There were 25 meetings with senior advisers and staff. Five of those were one-on-one-meetings, and one of those one-on-one meeting was with the prez.
 
Mr. Bigot would say, "the government steals your earnings to pay for those people. If we just cut all those entitlement programs, then your taxes would be low enough that you could work less."

If you have never encountered Mr. Bigot face to face, then consider yourself lucky.

I've encountered Mr. (and Mrs.) Bigot many, many times before, mainly in my own family. It's never pretty, no matter who's spewing the bigotry.

Michael
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom