Moderated Obama birth certificate CT / SSN CT / Birther discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Another case that slipped under the radar:

Wolf v Fuddy. Hearing today in Hawaii. Filed Sept 30, 2011

Unfortunately, I can't find the original complaint on the website, but a Soros agent is in Hawaii prepared to provide a summary of the hearing after 3pm PST.
 
A quick synopsis for the uninformed:
In Georgia, a group of birthertards managed to file a timely challenge to the DNC putting the president’s name on the primary ballot. They were granted an Administrative law Hearing of thier challenge. Foolishly, Georgia also granted Orly Taiz Pro Hac Vice status to represent the Plaintiffs in that case.

Georgia has very specific rules of procedures for ALHs. The ALH courts have had a web page with some downloadable forms to assist the attorneys in their cases. One of these forms is a pre-signed, blank subpoena intended for specific uses within the state of Georgia.

So, Orly promptly downloaded the form, filled it out, flew to Hawaii and filed a motion (or something, it gets a little confusing with Orly) in a case that had already been dismissed.

There are a number of rules for serving subpoenas out of state, and more specific rules for serving out of state subpoenas in Georgia ALHs. Needless to say, Orly followed none of the proper rules.

The money quote from the above document linked by KD.
“A few hours of legal research was all it took for the Defendant’s council to discover the applicable Georgia law pertaining to administrative hearings and administrative subpoenas. Either Plaintiff did not take that minimal amount of time before she presented her frivolous and unsubstantiated claims to this court, or worse scenario, she did take that time and actually knew that she had no merit to her claims.”
Click to expand...


ETA: Cheet sheet

http://www.scribd.com/doc/77996135/Crib-Notes-for-13-January-Hearing-in-Taitz-v-Fuddy
 
Last edited:
I love the "Please sanction this ditz who thinks she can mosey in and do what she likes, without taking the time to READ the applicable law...oh and consider her a vexatious litigant while you're at it" part of the Motion.


Lovely. If Hawaii becomes the first state to do so, this will be reported to the California Bar (who has shown a great disinterest in suspending her license to practice considering all the violations she has done to her clients' cases, posted at her website including un-redacted Social Security Numbers (not just Obama's), as well as calls to her cavity creeps to harass judges that are presiding or have presided over her cases).
 
OOhhh Orly has a hissy fit over the order:

Update. Corruption in the state of HI does not know limits
Posted on | January 13, 2012 | 1 Comment
I just arrived in HI and checked my e-mails. Deputy attorney general Nagamine represents a pinnacle of corruption of a governmental official. Not only she refuses to comply with the subpoena, but she claims that my demand for the original birth certificate is frivolous and that the judge should charge me the cost of all the hearings and deem me a vexatious litigant, not allowed to bring any more actions in HI without leave of court.
She completely disregarded the fact, that judge Malihi ordered Obama to stand trial on January 26 and prove his eligibility, that eligibility is the essence of the case and the birth certificate is the most important evidence . The level of corruption in the state of HI is unprecedented in human history. Don’t forget that the husband of this attorney is a family attorney for Obama’s family and he handled Obama’s sister’s divorce from her first husband.
I really hope that the judge will show integrity and will not be a part of this corrupt establishment. This remains to be seen.
All I know, that during Watergate a number of top governmental officials went to prison, among them attorney General of the U.S. and White House counsel. What Nagamine does is criminal, it is a violation of the civil rights of my clients and my civil rights under a color of authority. She is using a color of authority, her position as the deputy attorney general to cover up forgery, elections fraud, obstruct justice and on top of that she is harassing me and attempting to intimidate me under the color of authority.
This woman belongs in prison for what she is doing to me, to my clients and to the whole country.
She belongs in prison together with Obama and Fuddy and a number of others. This regime will not last forever. These people will be prosecuted. It remains to be seen on which side of history the judge will be: will the judge aid and abet this forgery and obstruct justice or will she uphold the law and the constitution and will fight crime in the White House and in the office of Attorney General of Hawaii.
You can see how much stress I have to withstand, you can see the financial threats that are applied towards me by corrupt officials of Obama regime. I was up from 4 am CA time It is 12:30 HI time or 2:30 am Ca time. It is nearly unbearable to withstand all of this stress of this criminal regime.
Comments
One Response to “Update. Corruption in the state of HI does not know limits”

1. Lapane
January 13th, 2012 @ 2:30 am
Yeppppppp!!! Your stupid *** is about to be smacked down for, let’s see—hmmmmm, about the 90th time. Russian attention whore.
Click to expand...

nothing makes me more happy than having this woman spend $1200 on RT to Hawaii and whatever hotel accommodations and rental cars each time she has to get there, only to find out her cases are dismissed right as she lands, or that she only spend 20 minutes in court.

Expect an "appeal" if Judge Nishimura rules in favor of HDOH/Hawaii AG


You may view the comment/post at her site , but I warn you, she's known to pass on infections through her fail of a blog.
 
Of course, the major issue with Taitz v Fuddy (as far as I can tell, anyway) is that it sprung from a case that is even more dead in the water, namely Taitz v Astrue.

Hell, I believe Taitz v Fuddy was originally dismissed because Taitz v Astrue had also been thrown out. Yet, for some reason, Orly is now trying to move the goalposts over to the state of Georgia and the hearing she has lined up there. Is that even possible?
 
KDLarsen said:
Hell, I believe Taitz v Fuddy was originally dismissed because Taitz v Astrue had also been thrown out. Yet, for some reason, Orly is now trying to move the goalposts over to the state of Georgia and the hearing she has lined up there. Is that even possible?
Click to expand...


In Orly Law, it is. the HI AG already pointed it out in the recent motion. Taht the original CASE for which all brought this on was summarily dismissed. That the current hearings had nothing to do with serving subpoenas and arguing Hawaii law. the underlying case has been dismissed, the APPEAL to that case has been dismissed and ORLY hasn't escalated it any further (Seeing that she can't even keep her own case in hawaii straight, i'm not sure she knows what's going and where)

To top it off, she still has her CA State Senator race for which she's begging her cavity creeps to donate money to.




in other news, Alabama has just dismissed another Ballot Challenge (Thompson v Kennedy)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/78162417/Alabama-Thompson-v-Kennedy-Order-of-Dismissal


And more out of Alabama, the original ballot challenge case (for which the Thompson case above was a word for word copy of), where Sorensen filed a Motion for Recusal of the judge (because she's black and a democrat), Ragsdale has filed an Opposition to that motion:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/78095175/Alabama-Sorensen-v-Kennedy-Opposition-to-Motion-for-Recusal
 
Arus808 said:
And more out of Alabama, the original ballot challenge case (for which the Thompson case above was a word for word copy of), where Sorensen filed a Motion for Recusal of the judge (because she's black and a democrat), Ragsdale has filed an Opposition to that motion:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/78095175/Alabama-Sorensen-v-Kennedy-Opposition-to-Motion-for-Recusal
Click to expand...




Footnote 1 should be required reading for anyone who ever has to deal with these idiots in court.....
 
I wonder if Orly has actually sent out all those subpoenas that she made for herself in the Gerogia case?
 
Deleted - read more of this thread.


Unreal. Is this what it would look like if twoofers actually got off their asses and got their little investigation?
 
Last edited:
And Orly has been denined again!


From a Soros agent in Hawaii:
http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=6342&start=3275#p328819

1: Judge Nishimura was more like what we saw in the video of the 30 November hearing, and not as irritated appearing as last time.
2: No real law school for Orly today. Actually, not a lot of reason to.
3: The hearing ran approximately 45 minutes, mostly because Orly was permitted to read her reply directly into the record. This kept her more focused than normal for the main portion of her argument.
4: Orly reading her reply into the record did result in a great deal of ******* insanity being read into the record.
5: We saw the bulk of the Defendant's argument in the opposition memo that was posted last night.
6: Defendant very firm that a separate sanctions memo will be forthcoming, and indicated that while they will ask for fees, they are primarily interested in the vexatious litigant order because financial sanctions have been shown not to deter Orly, and they do want to avoid wasting time in the future.
7: Orly was very agitated. Talking fast (several times too fast for the court reporter), loudly, shrilly. Very upset at being accused of frivolousness and vexatiousness. Both Judge Nishimura and Ms. Nagamine let her make her position very clear on the record without interruption or objection.
8: Judge Nishimura indicated that it was not completely inappropriate for Orly to have filed an additional motion in this case. Judge Nishimura cited "The Jenkins Ruling" (or possibly "Jenkins Case"). If someone wants to look that up, that would be great. I'm probably not going to have the time to in the next few hours.
9: Judge Nishimura dismissed. She based her dismissal on HRCP Rule 45, which Orly had cited in the motion.
10: Orly attempted at various times to call upon the precedents of Susan B Anthony, Korematsu, and Marbury v Madison.
Click to expand...

I really hope that Nagamine gets the vexatious litigant through and the court rules in her favor. Because that would finally be posted to the CA Bar on her profile, and they would have to deal with this failure of a lawyer, finally.
 
*whack*

The expanded summary, courtesy of AG Holders proxy in Hawaii, is a wonder to behold. I really like how Ms. Nagamine, the defense councel, pointed out that they can't submit a judgement in the case, as Orly keeps filing new motions that have to be resolved first.

She also pointed out, that they're seeking sanctions due to the amount of time they have to spend on Orlys filings. And that much of that time is spent, trying to figure out exactly what it is Orly want from them :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
KDLarsen said:
*whack*

The expanded summary, courtesy of AG Holders proxy in Hawaii, is a wonder to behold. I really like how Ms. Nagamine, the defense councel, pointed out that they can't submit a judgement in the case, as Orly keeps filing new motions that have to be resolved first.

She also pointed out, that they're seeking sanctions due to the amount of time they have to spend on Orlys filings. And that much of that time is spent, trying to figure out exactly what it is Orly want from them :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Really? What Orly wants is very easy to figure out: Get that black man out of the White House.
 
orly's swings for the fence

sent to Deputy Attorney General of HI Jill Nagamine

Posted on | January 15, 2012 | No Comments
Subpoena Fuddy GA January 26
Miss Nagamine,
out of abundance of caution I am serving you yet again with a subpoena for your client to appear at trial on January 26 and for pretrial deposition.
Please, be advised, that I will be seeking sanctions against you, if you do not cease and desist your meritless attacks on me and your continuing defamation of my character in that you are seeking for me to pay your costs in defending forgery and elections fraud by your officials and your requests for judge Nishimura to label me a vexatious plaintiff in the state of HI after bringing only 1 legal action in the state of HI, which is not frivolous, but a legitimate action of seeking inspection of an original document in light of an alleged copy, as well as and my service of subpoena for your client to appear at trial and for pretrial depositions. I will be reporting your actions and actions of your clients to the Oversight committee of the House of Representatives of the U.S. Congress, as well as the Inspector General of the Department of Justice for criminal investigation of violation of civil rights under color of authority, harassment of a civil rights attorney, defamation, obstruction of justice and aiding and abetting forgery and elections fraud.
Sincerely,

–
Dr Orly Taitz ESQ
Click to expand...

Of course, it goes without saying that the subpoena she is trying to serve on Hawaii's Deputy Attorney General is not valid outside the state of Georgia.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom