NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is it here yet? Still nothing in the mail from the NSA about your FOIA request? Back to waiting...
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Those document are my documents,

Of course they're your documents. That's not in dispute.

Who YOU are is. I say that Roger is your family member. Prove me wrong. My evidence of this is, as you admitted, you made your FOIA request from home, rather from work. That's because YOU are NOT Roger, and do not work at the NSA. Further evidence of this is the fact that your story on EBaum regarding your security clearance/codes changed from post to post. This is because you are not intelligent enough to keep your lies straight. Further evidence is how you've stated publicly that you work for the NSA, which as Sabrina pointed out, is not kosher.

So please grow up and admit that you do not work at the NSA.

Also, please be mature enough to admit that you were lying when you said that an F-4 Phantom is mostly made of steel.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
I believe on Ebaums, he posted his "work number' once. A forum users tried to call it, and a woman answered...and didnt know anything about the NSA. We're assuming it was just his mom.
Also, the IP addresses used on that forum all came from a home address, even at times when he was supposed to be at work.
The mods there saw thru his lies and banned him from posting there.
 
Gavron said:
I believe on Ebaums, he posted his "work number' once. A forum users tried to call it, and a woman answered...and didnt know anything about the NSA. We're assuming it was just his mom.
Also, the IP addresses used on that forum all came from a home address, even at times when he was supposed to be at work.
The mods there saw thru his lies and banned him from posting there.
Click to expand...


Why doesn't this surprise me? Lol...
 
I would like to announce that the previous announcement was not the announcement that was intended. The intended announcement will be unattended.
 
I'll submit an FOIA request for your announced announcement information....
 
T.A.M. said:
As for the rest of this "bluster", Let me know when CNN broadcasts,

"NSA Analyst blows lid off government version of the 9/11 attacks"

Until then, this particularly ridiculous truther is going in the ignore column.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Good decision.
 
Ultima,
You dont by any chance happen to have that 4 hour researchers edition that the CIT seems to have misplaced?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
FOIA request‏
From:
Sent: Sat 8/16/08 11:08 PM
To: foianet@nsa.gov

PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT: Authority for collecting information requested is contained in 5 U.S.C. § 552a and 5 U.S.C. § 552. NSA's Blanket Routine Uses found at 58 Fed. Reg. 10,531 (1993) as well as the specific uses found in GNSA02, GNSA03, and GNSA10 apply to this information. Authority for requesting your Social Security Number (SSN) is Executive Order 9397. The requested information will be used to assist the Agency in locating and disseminating the applicable records to the requestor. The disclosure of the requested information, to include your SSN, is voluntary. However, failure to provide the requested information may delay the processing of your request.


Full name:

Company/Organization: NSA

Address

Home Phone:

Work Phone:

Description of the records you seek: I would like to get a declassified copy of the CRITIC messages and any follow up reports from September 11, 2001 of the interception of Flight 93.
Click to expand...


Uh huh. So, did you make this request via the NSA FOIA website form or did you send in an e-mail request?
 
Seymour Butz said:
ULTIMA1 said:
you made your FOIA request from home, rather from work.
Click to expand...

I made the FOIA request from home so i could show it to you online. Wasn't to hard to figure that out huh?

Also, please be mature enough to admit that you were lying when you said that an F-4 Phantom is mostly made of steel.
Click to expand...

I have proven through facts and evidence (that you cannot debate) that the F-4 with engines is made mostly of steel.

I only hope one day you will grow up, stop living in a fantasy world and face reallity.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Gavron said:
Also, the IP addresses used on that forum all came from a home address, even at times when he was supposed to be at work.
.
Click to expand...

Please be adult enough to stop the lies.

I had other members figure out and state where i worked, I had shown what hours i worked and when i was online. i had shown members and mods who i was and where i worked.

Please stop the lies.
 
LashL said:
Uh huh. So, did you make this request via the NSA FOIA website form or did you send in an e-mail request?
Click to expand...

I sent it via e-mail so i could show it online, like i did.

I have shown a letter from the NSA FOIA office verifing the request.

What else do you need me to show to verify the request was made and the document has been verified?

Would you like the phone number to the FOIA office?
 
"The Announcement will not be televised."

Oh, sorry - we've moved past that bit, I guess.

Ultima1 - dude, stop it. You've got nothing. Post back here when you get the FOIA response and post that response in full. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and predict you will not be man enough to do even that.

Please, by all that is holy (or better yet - all that's not), prove me wrong.
 
In all the fuss, ULTIMA1 seems to have missed my earlier post.

ULTIMA1, please ignore the sniping. We were making some good progress earlier, please let us continue with this.


Horatius said:
Okay, we're making progress. Let's just focus on this one document you claim to have seen, and are expecting to arrive, okay?

Now, please try to answer a few specific questions about the contents of this document:

Does it clearly identify the type of aircraft that intercepted Flight 93? That is, does it say "F-16", "F-15", or some such clear designation? If so, what type of plane was it?

Does it clearly state that the intercepting plane fired at flight 93?

Does it clearly state what was fired at Flight 93? That is, was it a missile or gun fire that brought Flight 93 down? If it was a missile, does the document specify the type of missile used, such as a Sidewinder?

Does it clearly state the time of this intercept?

Does it clearly state the location of this intercept?

Does it detail what orders were given to the pilot of the intercepting aircraft?

Does it detail any radio communications between the pilot of this aircraft and anyone else, either on the ground or in the air?
Click to expand...
 
Horatius said:
ULTIMA1, please ignore the sniping. We were making some good progress earlier, please let us continue with this.
Click to expand...


Let me post what i can post for now, untill i get the document and see what was taken out.

The main Critic states that flight 93 was intercepted. As far as type of aircraft i have to wait and see if the declassifed copy gives types.

Their are reports that follow up reports to the main Critic state that a plane came back with a missile missing.

It does state times, but they are in Zulu time, if you understand what that is?
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
Let me post what i can post for now, untill i get the document and see what was taken out.

The main Critic states that flight 93 was intercepted. As far as type of aircraft i have to wait and see if the declassifed copy gives types.

Their are reports that follow up reports to the main Critic state that a plane came back with a missile missing.

It does state times, but they are in Zulu time, if you understand what that is?
Click to expand...



Yes, I understand Zulu time.

However, part of the purpose of answering the above questions is to allow us to determine if the document that shows up is in any way the same document you claim to have already seen. If you don't answer them until after you have the forthcoming document, most of the people here simply won't believe you ever saw the earlier document, particularly if the forthcoming version lacks any details to support the conclusion that Flight 93 was shot down.

I can understand if you do not want to post the specific information as requested above, but can we at least get yes/no answers to some of the questions?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom