• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Not another one?

OneShotKi11 said:
Well atleast he was a man of action. Unlike the rest of you NWO/WTC conspirator witnesses. I wonder why the rest of the movement wasnt behind him?
Click to expand...

By all means go
Edited by Locknar: 
Breach of Rule 0 removed


(ETA: That was facetious, I assume that you aren't stupid enough to be acutally thinking about doing that)


ETA 2: I mean Seriously, OSK, why do you think they rest of the movement wasn't behind him? In spite of their general lunacy, none of them really want to go out and get shot in the head.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
UNLoVedRebel said:
His bizarre wiki rant says he has his Bachelor's in Physics from UC Santa Cruz, just like R.Mackey and they are roughly the same age.
Click to expand...

It's not me, nor anyone I've ever heard of. I graduated in 1993. He was probably a couple of classes after me.

I agree it looks like a "suicide by cop" -- one of total madness.

Very unfortunate that the officers were wounded, and that this nut forced them to kill him. I'm glad to hear they are recovering well.
 
if 9-11 Truther organizations do not condemn this act of political murder, committed by one of their own, they must be seen as condoning it.

in cases like this....silence=acceptance.
 
OneShotKi11 said:
Well atleast he was a man of action.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but rather incompetent action, don't you think? I mean, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Mihn all worked to organize groups and gather members to work on a scale their respective governments would notice, as well as be big enough to where they would have a real effect. But this guy...

Even if we presume for the sake of argument that the delusions inhernet in such a paranoid were justified, why commit this action? It's like ice-age mankind hunting the mastodon: The one guy who thought it was a good idea but acted alone died on the tusks of his prey. It was the others who banded together and thought through their actions that accomplished something.

The fact that he was a "man of action" who resorted to this speaks volumes about his 1. Manifest irrationality, (take on the Pentagon by ones self?) 2. Selfishness, and related egotism (he was going to take action all by himself, not involve anyone) and 3. Ineffectiveness. In his case, it's not a compliment.
 
parky76 said:
if 9-11 Truther organizations do not condemn this act of political murder, committed by one of their own, they must be seen as condoning it.

in cases like this....silence=acceptance.
Click to expand...

You underestimate the power of cognitive dissonance. They are all simultaneously convinced that he was a heroic freedom fighter, a false flag attacker sponsored by the giant conspiracy, is still alive, never existed in the first place, and was shot not by the Pentagon police but by the driver of JFK's limousine.

Dave
 
R.Mackey said:
It's not me, nor anyone I've ever heard of. I graduated in 1993. He was probably a couple of classes after me.

I agree it looks like a "suicide by cop" -- one of total madness.

Very unfortunate that the officers were wounded, and that this nut forced them to kill him. I'm glad to hear they are recovering well.
Click to expand...

At least physically.
 
if I was the FBI I would have an agent infiltrate ever WAC group in the USA.

how do we know WAC is not testing the waters of police response to such actions?
 
"He was very well armed. I will tell you he had two 9 mm semiautomatic weapons and many magazines," Keevill said.

He added that the man's car that he drove from California...
Click to expand...


That'll teach him to come from California. He wouldn't have needed as many magazines if he wasn't hindered by their stupid "10 round maximum" limit.

/16 +1 like a mofo. :cool:
 
OneShotKi11 said:
I dont mind being watched. I have nothing to hide. Do you?
Click to expand...

oneshotki11,

Yours is a quintessentially important observation and I thank you for posting it. To me, your statement is the very best possible illustration of how one surrenders one's freedom, willingly, even joyfully.

The statement "I have nothing to hide" contains within it a tacit willingness to neither say, let alone do, anything that officialdom might be displeased with. The statement "I dont mind being watched" represents your abject, complete and total surrender of your freedom.

You are in effect saying "I don't ever say or do anything the authorities don't want me to say or do, therfore I am 'OK,' acceptable, harmless and clean as a hound's tooth."

Well, the point however, is this: Most people DO have things that they might like to hide, including their PRIVATE THOUGHTS that can range far, wide, encompass the rational, the playful, the sinful, the irrational and so on, ad infinitum. Most people also DO THINGS ON A CONSTANT BASIS THAT THEY MIGHT LIKE TO HIDE such as exceed the speed limit, misrepresent their income, sometimes on the high side, sometimes on the low, depending on who needs to be either impressed or guarded against, have anger, resentment and even hatred for someone at work, or school, or in the same house, or same bed; or have love for someone who is in someone else's bed. Whatever.

Most of us have things that we would like to hide -- not hide -- as that is a perjorative word from the gitgo. Rather, the word is PRIVACY an the other word is FREEDOM. Most of us have things we would like to keep private as doins so is consistent with freedom.

By the way, I thought we was "the land of the free and the home of the brave" which, one might have thought, that we stand up to authority when it becomes intrusive and, instead, demand freedom under any and all circumstances, save only those where we run afoul of legitimate laws and/or hurt others.

It is too bad your post contains no recognition of freedom at all.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
I like it. The 'gunned down' part especially. It kind of sounds like murder or something. Good Old Daily Mail is coming on board too.

'' 9/11 conspiracy theorist' gunned down by security guards in Pentagon shoot-out "....Yes. it really does tell a story between the lines doesn't it ?
Click to expand...

The story is with you spreading lies you are helping idiots like this believe and act out your failed parniod ideas. You spread lies and others die. Good job bill, you are spreading lies which can hurt others, how truthy of you.
 
The truthers can't debate well.
+
The truthers can't destroy well.
=
Fail as any type of political movement, civil or radical.
 
Originally Posted by bill smith
I like it. The 'gunned down' part especially. It kind of sounds like murder or something. Good Old Daily Mail is coming on board too.

you like it that one of your comrades went on a suicide mission? nice. what if he killed a child? or a pregnant woman?

would you still like it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom