no serial numbers were identified from flight 77

[Baylor]

I will venture right now, without any conflicting proof, that the only bodies found inside the Pentagon were those that worked there.

Nuclear DNA testing (along with dental records and
fingerprints) of the remains from the victims aboard
American Airline (AA) Flight 77 and within the Pentagon
was useful for identifying 178 of the 183 victims. Five
missing individuals (four within the Pentagon and one
aboard the airplane) could not be identified due to lack of
biological material from the crash. Five remaining nuclear
STR profiles were obtained from the crash site that did not
match any references for the victims. These profiles were
thought to represent the terrorists aboard the flight. The 40
victims aboard the United Airline (UA) Flight 93 that
crashed near Shanksville, PA, were also identified by
nuclear DNA testing, dental records, and fingerprinting.
Four nonmatching nuclear DNA profiles were also obtained
from the crash site and again tentatively ascribed to the
terrorists.
The DNA results strengthened the hypothesis that two
of the terrorists were brothers, as indicated by other
evidence. Two of the terrorist STR profiles aboard the AA
Flight 77 gave a sibling index greater than 500. To further
test the hypothesis of maternal relatedness, AFDIL
sequenced the HVI and HVII regions of mtDNA for these
individuals. The sequences generated did match in HVI
and HVII, which is consistent with a maternal relationship
between the two men.

http://911myths.com/images/f/f1/Edson2004.pdf

 

[KreeL]

Wrong. It is my hypothesis and it hasn't been proven wrong yet.

Go get the facts, pray about it, and get back to me.

 

[beachnut]

Wrong. It is my hypothesis and it hasn't been proven wrong yet.

Go get the facts, pray about it, and get back to me.

Do you know why serial numbers are needed?

Your hypothesis is what?

 

[Arus808]

Wrong. It is my hypothesis and it hasn't been proven wrong yet.

which proves you have no clue what you are talking about and again are a liar

Go get the facts, pray about it, and get back to me.

its called a SEARCH function. your claims have been debunked years ago.

 

[jhunter1163]

Why am I reminded of the Black Knight from "Monty Python and the Holy Grail"?

 

[Dave Rogers]

I will venture right now, without any conflicting proof, that the only bodies found inside the Pentagon were those that worked there.

Ah, the classic truther fallacy: if you ignore all the evidence that indicates that 9/11 was not an inside job, then there is no other evidence that indicates that 9/11 was not an inside job, therefore 9/11 was an inside job.

Dave

 

[Obviousman]

You could have just answered NO.

Why is it so hard? Why do you feel the need to try and explain it all away?

You have no serial numbers. No one asked if you think it is significant or not.

The planes on 9/11 were not identified.

If they were then present the evidence that positivly identifies the PLANES.

The PLANES.

The question is about the PLANES.

*sigh*

How about you answer a question, yes or no: do you still beat your wife?

 

[T.A.M.]

If the FBI released the serial numbers, then twoofers would simply say that the list of serial numbers associated with AA77 was faked by the FBI (or other NWO outfit).

Bingo!

TAM

 

[JimBenArm]

Good luck finding any evidence there was anything else that happened. The military is way better than you are, we hid the evidence where you can't find it, morons like you could never figure out how we did it, so go ahead. Waste your time.

I may come back and give you some details on it. Just to keep your nose twitching.

Ta-ta, losers!

 

[doobiedoright]

Wrong. It is my hypothesis and it hasn't been proven wrong yet.

Go get the facts, pray about it, and get back to me.

So pictures of charred remains still strapped into the planes seat worked there?
Those pictures are heart wrenching.you should be very ashamed!
By the way those tragic pictures do PROVE YOU WRONG!

 

[240-185]

Total fail. No bodies of the plane victims were identified inside the Pentagon.

Ohhhhhhhhh. What are these?

I will fix that for you:

I'm bringing my total fail: no bodies of the plane victims were identified inside the Pentagon.

 

[BenBurch]

Sure we have a serial number or two. Off the FDR and CVR. And off a serving cart (somebody posted the picture of the scrap with the number.)

Now, do you so-stupid-you-have-to-read-the-directions-on-bathroom-tissue "truthers" think that serial numbers are faithfully recorded in any other crashes? It is simply not the case that there was ANY doubt at all which aircraft this was, and there was also zero doubt as to how it got to where it was.

Only people who are much too stupid to tie shoes have any trouble with that fact.

 

[MG1962]

I have scanned the thread but could not see this point. What makes people think parts on aircraft have serial numbers to begin with. Under International Standards Association guidelines, parts have to have a batch number that will identify when the product was produced, but not a unique serial number.

If a batch had 500 components in the maufacturing run, there is no way to tell what aircraft each particular peice went into. Simply the piece manufactured on x date at y factory was used in either the building or repair of an aircraft.

 

[WildCat]

Total fail. No bodies of the plane victims were identified inside the Pentagon.

Technically true. The remains were collected inside the Pentagon and identified in a proper laboratory.

 

[BenBurch]

I have scanned the thread but could not see this point. What makes people think parts on aircraft have serial numbers to begin with. Under International Standards Association guidelines, parts have to have a batch number that will identify when the product was produced, but not a unique serial number.

If a batch had 500 components in the maufacturing run, there is no way to tell what aircraft each particular peice went into. Simply the piece manufactured on x date at y factory was used in either the building or repair of an aircraft.

Well, the airframe has a number (and a little aluminum builder's plate) and I understand that certain parts that need to be tracked for maintenance have serial numbers, but the majority of bits from an aircraft will not have a serial number.

 

[nicepants]

So to sum up:

There's DNA evidence of 90% of the people on the plane, recovered inside the pentagon.

There are plane parts from a Boeing 757 recovered inside the pentagon.

There are 100+ people who saw the plane fly into the pentagon.

AA was missing that plane on 9/12/2001.

There is no evidence that he plane continued to operate after 9/11/2001.

.....and a few idiots think that because every serial number of every part of that plane wasn't listed for them that all of the above is invalid?

 

[BenBurch]

So to sum up:

There's DNA evidence of 90% of the people on the plane, recovered inside the pentagon.

There are plane parts from a Boeing 757 recovered inside the pentagon.

There are 100+ people who saw the plane fly into the pentagon.

AA was missing that plane on 9/12/2001.

There is no evidence that he plane continued to operate after 9/11/2001.

.....and a few idiots think that because every serial number of every part of that plane wasn't listed for them that all of the above is invalid?

You got it.

 

[jhunter1163]

Those airliners run about $100 million a copy. Not like having a ball-peen hammer falling down a manhole; even if the Pentagon bought the hammer, it's still only $600.

 

[Reheat]

So to sum up:

There's one more important FACT to add to your summary. There is a CONTINUOUS radar track with NO MISSING RETURNS from shortly after take-off at Dulles until it's about 3-4 minutes from impacting the Pentagon, where it was too low to be picked up by radar.

 

[MG1962]

Well, the airframe has a number (and a little aluminum builder's plate) and I understand that certain parts that need to be tracked for maintenance have serial numbers, but the majority of bits from an aircraft will not have a serial number.

But thats my point. That serial numbers on the part is not unique to that aircraft, only to the manufacturing run that created it. A part with the number 12345/A could be found in a 100 aircraft.

The reason for this. Say in normal operation the part fails. The relative authorities can put out a notice asking for inspections of all aircraft that have that number. If a unique number was created, no one can back track to see if it was a manufacturing error that caused the failure.

Today with the evolution of inventory programs like SAP it may be possible to create a unique serial/batch number that can be tracked. But in the mid 80's when these planes were assembled no one had that ability. And as off 2005 - The last time I was involved in such things, it was not even a requirement.

The logic, aside from cost, is obvious. No one building a plane ever thought the parts would need to be used to forensically prove the particular plane crashed.