alfaniner
Penultimate Amazing
Your body and more importantly, treatments, change after 20 years. I suggest another consult to determine your current status.
Merged New telepathy test: which number did I write ?
- Thread starter Michel H
- Start date
-
- Tags
- telepathy telepathy test
- Status
Your body and more importantly, treatments, change after 20 years. I suggest another consult to determine your current status.
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Placing in a mental health unit of the hospital happened (according to you) only after you told the doctors ('they') about the voices in your head.
What was the physical problem you originally visited the hospital for?
It is possible that many of you are affected by a mild and very widespread mental disorder, which might be called "telepaphobia", and defined as a fear to recognize the reality of the "Michel H telepathic phenomenon".
This might perhaps explain some of your strange contradictions, and why you almost refuse now to participate in tests. It is possible that you perceive (wrongly) your own aggressivity as a form of protection.
This is perhaps something you should talk about with your General Practice doctor, or with your psychiatrist (if you have one, and if you feel you can devote a few minutes of your time to this)
This might perhaps explain some of your strange contradictions, and why you almost refuse now to participate in tests. It is possible that you perceive (wrongly) your own aggressivity as a form of protection.
This is perhaps something you should talk about with your General Practice doctor, or with your psychiatrist (if you have one, and if you feel you can devote a few minutes of your time to this)
Daylightstar
Philosopher
There is no 'Michel H telepathic phenomenon'.
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Michel H, what was the physical problem you originally visited the hospital for?
Last edited:
ComfySlippers
Banned
Don't you find it odd that, according to yourself, everyone else in this thread has a mental condition?
Strange that everyone who tells you that your not telepathic, that there is no such thing as telepathy, that you need to seek professional help has a hidden agenda?
Peculiar that you take seriously every single sarcastic/jokey response when everyone else sees these responses for what they are?
Disturbing that you keep returning to start the same "test" over and over even though everyone tells you how and why your "test" is stupid beyond belief?
Weird that you think your Doctor admits you're telepathic when telepathy is a fictional nonsense?
See a proper Doctor Michel H. Many people have been way to patient in your silly "test" threads over the years. You listen to nobody anyway.
For the thousandth time: asking people to guess a number from one to four is not a test of anything. You are not telepathic. No one is. There is no such thing.
One of the most difficult things about mental illness is that the one who suffers from it rarely recognises that they do. That's why you ignore everyone in your silly test threads who doesn't agree with you, (no one agrees with you), or mistake sarcasm for agreement. It's also why you invented your idiotic "credibility rating" system so that only correct answers are counted. Surely you can, by now, see the craziness of that?!
See. A. Doctor.
Last edited:
You too have been behaving in a very inconsistent way, which suggests a mild mental disorder (that I call "telepaphobia").
In April 2015, you replied to my post:
by saying:
This was apparently a very nice and pretty admission of my "telepathy". I would like to see more of those from you.
But now, what do you say? :
The contradiction is obvious, poor telepaphobia sufferer...
According to you, I should consult with millions of physicians, until I finally I find one (that you call "proper") who agrees with your radically skeptical views, and who is willing to give me dangerous and toxic pseudo-medications.
Don't see how absurd this is?
p0lka
Illuminator
Thats a +1 to you just winding (winding in this context means pretending **** for giggles) people up.
Last edited:
Daylightstar
Philosopher
"But surely I'd have received" means "But surely I would have received" with an implied "if", meaning he didn't receive any of your thoughts and doesn't believe he can receive your words and doesn't believe you 'have telepathy'.
There is no contradiction. What ComfySlippers said earlier is in complete accordance with what he said later.
You're trying to shoehorn everything people say into your delusion.
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Michel H, what was the physical problem you originally visited the hospital for, before you were put in the psychiatric ward??
Yes, I agree, but I don't think this alters my conclusion. And highly significant (and not very good for you, I am afraid) is the fact that you probably deliberately quoted Comfy in an incomplete way, the full quote being:
Interesting, how you "forgot" to mention "your thoughts" in his phrase "I'd have received your thoughts".
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Of course your conclusion won't be altered. It never will. Your conclusions needs to take you away from appropriate attention.
I forgot nothing. I used the parts which were needed to illustrate the meaning of "I'd have" being "I would have", in the same sentence though I used "meaning he didn't receive any of your thoughts".
The full quote also appears in the top of my post.
What is your complaint again?
Last edited:
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Michel H, when you went to hospital for a physical problem, why did you start talking about the voices you hear?
Was there a connection between the voices and this physical problem?
Was there a connection between the voices and this physical problem?
ComfySlippers
Banned
There is NO contradiction whatsoever!
I have never given a very nice and pretty admission of your "telepathy" because you are not telepathic.
Noone is. There is no such thing as telepathy.
Yet again you demonstrate your inability to recognise sarcasm.
Please don't invent, and assign to me, mental disorders. You're not really the person to be doing that.
In the real world you won't need to consult with millions of physicians to find one who agrees with the posters here.
A reputable one will tell you there's no such thing as telepathy.
He won't give you the dangerous and toxic "pseudo-medications" you refuse to take.
He'll probably refer you to a psychiatrist who can help you with your paranoia and schizophrenia.
Last edited:
You don't seem to be able to understand your own English, but you want to tell me how to manage my health.
Sigmund Freud (https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigmund_Freud) for example was a physician of great reputation, who corresponded with Einstein, and who wrote :"Psycho-Analysis and Telepathy", and "Dreams and Telepathy". This webpage https://books.google.be/books?id=rX2w6QELtKgC&pg=PA396&lpg=PA396&dq=freud+telepathy&source=bl&ots=t9yb2NmIZ8&sig=X5xiRCQM2FkFyNlYxiavx1XeiXY&hl=fr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjs4Y3j2rDKAhVHtBoKHX75B9AQ6AEIMjAC#v=onepage&q=freud%20telepathy&f=false ("The Freud Encyclopedia") says: "Freud expressed greater conviction about telepathy privately than he did publicly." Freud: not reputable enough for his excellency ComfySlippers perhaps?
And, by the way, if you see sarcasm where there is no such thing (together with some of your fellows on this forum), you are "seeing" things that aren't there. Isn't that a symptom of schizophrenia? Show some of the posts I have repeated in this thread because I found them good to a psychiatrist! You might be surprised by what he/she tells you.
Last edited:
Donn
Philosopher
Truly there is no way to cleave the implacably sincere from the pathological prankster, with mental illness shading the boundaries.
This thread is the culmination of despair.
This thread is the culmination of despair.
jmontecillo01
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2006
- Messages
- 262
Hi Michel,
I don't know if this would help but I'll give it a try anyway.
I suffer from schizophrenia-affective. I come to this forum everyday but I try not to join the conversation. I haven't had a relapse from 2001, but had one two years (I think) ago. The reason, I joined the conversation (here JREF), and it started to make me think (again) that I am super special. It is good that after two days, I realized that something was wrong with my thoughts.
Like you, I also suffer from what is called thought broadcasting. There are other things too like delusions that I am special and reports directly to God. Of course, as with thought broadcasting, I also suffer from thought insertion. Also visual and auditory hallucinations.
My first episode was way back 1988. It wasn't until 2000 that the doctors found a medication that works. Also, this forum (jref) made me realize that I have to question everything. Being an agnostic now, helps me realize that my belief of being Gods servant is an obvious delusion.
I do hope that you question what you are experiencing. There is nothing anyone can do unless you help yourself.
I don't know if this would help but I'll give it a try anyway.
I suffer from schizophrenia-affective. I come to this forum everyday but I try not to join the conversation. I haven't had a relapse from 2001, but had one two years (I think) ago. The reason, I joined the conversation (here JREF), and it started to make me think (again) that I am super special. It is good that after two days, I realized that something was wrong with my thoughts.
Like you, I also suffer from what is called thought broadcasting. There are other things too like delusions that I am special and reports directly to God. Of course, as with thought broadcasting, I also suffer from thought insertion. Also visual and auditory hallucinations.
My first episode was way back 1988. It wasn't until 2000 that the doctors found a medication that works. Also, this forum (jref) made me realize that I have to question everything. Being an agnostic now, helps me realize that my belief of being Gods servant is an obvious delusion.
I do hope that you question what you are experiencing. There is nothing anyone can do unless you help yourself.
Indeed not. Freud's views on almost everything are now considered wrong, dated, hackneyed, irrelevant, pseudoscience.
There are repeated examples throughout this thread of you missing sarcasm, and refusing to accept that a post was sarcastic, even after the person who wrote the post confirmed that every word they wrote was sarcastic. This is a symptom of your condition, not any condition you may assign to us.
It has indeed happened several times on this forum that a person seemed to support my "thought broadcasting theory", but later retracted and adopted a very aggressive and contemptuous attitude in line with "the crowd" (so to speak). I have observed such behavior with my mother too. I am inclined to believe that such erratic and contradictory behaviors are a sign of mild mental derangement on your side, rather than mine, even though I fully realize that this is not what you like to hear.
- Status