Wait and see
You don't have any memory of what you learned at school then ?
Do you understand the difference between rote memorization and your recollection of an anecdote related to you from a traumatized individual?
Wait and see
You don't have any memory of what you learned at school then ?
Do you understand the difference between rote memorization and your recollection of an anecdote related to you from a traumatized individual?
Memory absorbs and files information whether it be anecdote or fact
4. Memory is personal
Human memory does not exist so that an observer may accurately report previously seen events. The actual, physical events are merely grist for the mill of interpretation. Each witness extracts an interpretation that is meaningful in terms of his own beliefs, experiences and needs. Once the interpretation occurs, the events themselves become relatively unimportant. Moreover, since each person interprets the events in terms of his own world view, different eyewitnesses observing the same event may have different interpretations and different memories. To put it succinctly:
"We do not see what we sense. We see what we think we sense. Our consciousness is presented with an interpretation, not the raw data. Long after presentation, an unconscious information processing has discarded information, so that we see a simulation, a hypothesis, an interpretation; and we are not free to choose" (Norretranders, 1999).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_memory_biasesWhile in education most people have to use their memories intensively - simply to remember facts and pass exams. When people leave full time education, they tend to cease to use their memory as actively, and so it starts to get flaccid.
http://www.visualexpert.com/Resources/eyewitnessmemory.html
http://www.academictips.org/memory/fallacy.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_memory_biases
Have a read.[/
Yes I can absorb, file all that info and repeat it in a decade or two
I knew a man and his wife that had OBE when faced with a head on car crash. They told me they watched the actual impact from above and couldn't understand that at all. They watched as ambulances took them. They then couldn't recall anything until they woke up in hospital. Again this was in the seventies and unheard of.
It maybe that when OBE occurs, the concentration is on looking at your own body and not what is placed on top of a cupboard
=mstricky;10222592]http://www.visualexpert.com/Resources/eyewitnessmemory.html
http://www.academictips.org/memory/fallacy.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_memory_biases
Have a read.[/
Yes I can absorb, file all that info and repeat it in a decade or two
I can certainly remember back 15 minutes or so, when your original reply to Resume here was "you believe all that rubbish?" Why the change? Did you spot the obvious problem with it? (Not that this one's any better)
I don't think you've absorbed much of anything discussed in this thread. Other than your posts.Yes I can absorb, file all that info and repeat it in a decade or two
I don't think you've absorbed much of anything discussed in this thread. Other than your posts.
I think you must be a psychic then
As I just coincidentally mentioned in another thread, there is a difference between episodic (autobiographical) memory and semantic (facts, knowledge, etc.) memory. The former has been shown to be unexpectedly unreliable (to the extent that the value of eyewitness testimony in the legal system is under serious question).Yes I can absorb, file all that info and repeat it in a decade or two
No. Not all resuscitation patients, all groups that have similar experiences. Limiting to resuscitation patients artificially restricts the test sample to a group that could have had a near death experience. That is confirmation bias. You need a control group for similar experiences to confirm that there are differences. In other words, he is claiming that the two groups are different but he has no evidence for it because he didn't bother doing a control test. With what is in his study, he has nothing.
As I just coincidentally mentioned in another thread, there is a difference between episodic (autobiographical) memory and semantic (facts, knowledge, etc.) memory. The former has been shown to be unexpectedly unreliable (to the extent that the value of eyewitness testimony in the legal system is under serious question).
In this instance, I wasn't an eye witness. I asked the couple had they fully recovered from their injuries then, said a head on collision must be terrifying. They then told me about their experience which was only a couple of sentences as in my first post about it.
What they said was mind boggling and puzzling to me; as I have said, no one knew about ODE in those days, me included.
It was also a bit scary. They are two very intelligent people but ordinary; not dramatic or attention seekers. Nothing about the incident has been mentioned since.
Who are the experts that do these studies and do they test every individual in the world?
Scientists and experts are becoming more laughable these days than cold readers. For years we were told that best butter is not good for us and that it causes high cholesterol levels. Recently they have announced that it is good for us, doesn't cause high cholesterol and that, that type of fat is vital to our bodies. One report was about coffee not being good for us but now it is.
When these latest reports come out in the newspapers, the comments below tell me that most people now take them with a pinch of salt...... oh that's now good for us apparently and does not cause high blood pressure.
Regarding religion being founded on OBEs, yes I can see that now but I have only recently come to that conclusion after reading the bible cover to cover a couple of times. But what you have said about that, must tell you that OBEs exist and have done for thousands of years.
Could they all have been lying?
They can also all be honestly mistaken.Yes.
They can also all be honestly mistaken.
I had never heard of sleep paralysis when I first experienced it, it was terrifying and I can understand why many of those who experience it reach for a paranormal explanation. But the fact remains that it is a well understood phenomenon, with a purely physiological cause. As are NDE/OBE experiences.
But what you have said about that, must tell you that OBEs exist and have done for thousands of years.