I think two conflicting maxims are in play here:
“The past is prologue.” and “Past performance is no guarantee of future results."
If the past is prologue, Musk has a track record of home runs. Some investors are betting that there’s some “special sauce” that will allow for his venturing into robotics, A.I. and Robotaxi’s to also be home runs. And they may be proven right.
But I sold my TSLA shares on the basis of the latter maxim. I think the competition in each of these fields is formidable, and that Musk may be overreaching. I think relying on “vision only” for autonomous driving and disparaging the need for LIDAR and/or RADAR will potentially cripple reaching true autonomous driving. And there’s a LOT of thrashing around and lack of focus on Tesla’s core business, making and selling cars*. But I still hold that markets are efficient, if not always rational, and that all of these factors result in today’s stock price. In short, it’s where it “should be”, all things considered, and its future value is unknowable.
*An example: The CyberTruck was originally planned to have up to 500 miles of range. It barely has 300 miles, rendering it a poor choice for towing, where range is roughly cut in half. As a band-aid, they took deposits on a $16,000 “Range Extender”, which had to be permanently installed and would eat up about 1/3 of the bed while cutting down on useful load and still didn’t get to the promised 500 mile range. An obviously horrible compromise. And just last week Tesla axed the whole idea. I expect a class action suit from folks who only bought their CyberTrucks based on this expected future product. Buyers of the truck also had “Autopilot” included, but now they’ve been told it will not be forthcoming and they’ll need to purchase “Full Self Driving” just to get auto-steer capability. What a fiasco.